Cargando…
The credibility of subgroup analyses reported in stroke trials is low: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Subgroup analyses are widely used to evaluate the heterogeneity of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. However, there is a limited investigation of the quality of prespecified and reported subgroup analyses in stroke trials. This study evaluated the credibility of subgroup a...
Autores principales: | Ademola, Ayoola, Thabane, Lehana, Adekanye, Joel, Okikiolu, Ayooluwanimi, Babatunde, Samuel, Almekhlafi, Mohammed A, Menon, Bijoy K, Hill, Michael D, Hildebrand, Kevin A, Sajobi, Tolulope T |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36988330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17474930231168517 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A comparison of meta-analytic methods for synthesizing evidence from explanatory and pragmatic trials
por: Sajobi, Tolulope T., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Three simple rules to ensure reasonably credible subgroup analyses
por: Burke, James F, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Functional Outcome Prediction in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms and Regression Models
por: Alaka, Shakiru A., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Credibility of subgroup analyses by socioeconomic status in public health intervention evaluations: An underappreciated problem?
por: Inglis, Greig, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Systematic review of economic evaluations investigating education, exercise, and dietary weight management to manage hip and knee osteoarthritis: protocol
por: Mazzei, Darren R., et al.
Publicado: (2020)