Cargando…

882. Gender Disparities in Faculty Rank and Mentorship opportunities Within a Sample of US Academic Infectious Disease Divisions

BACKGROUND: Gender inequities in promotion within academic medicine, including academic infectious diseases (ID), are well-documented. Effective mentorship is a key component of career advancement and data show that same-gender mentorship can be valuable for women junior faculty learning to navigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hollenberg, Benjamin, Cawcutt, Kelly, Marcelin, Jasmine R, Zimmer, Andrea J, Cortes-Penfield, Nicolas W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678286/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.927
_version_ 1785150326715711488
author Hollenberg, Benjamin
Cawcutt, Kelly
Marcelin, Jasmine R
Zimmer, Andrea J
Cortes-Penfield, Nicolas W
author_facet Hollenberg, Benjamin
Cawcutt, Kelly
Marcelin, Jasmine R
Zimmer, Andrea J
Cortes-Penfield, Nicolas W
author_sort Hollenberg, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gender inequities in promotion within academic medicine, including academic infectious diseases (ID), are well-documented. Effective mentorship is a key component of career advancement and data show that same-gender mentorship can be valuable for women junior faculty learning to navigate academia. We compared the gender, bibliometrics, and mentorship opportunity distributions of ID faculty at each academic rank (instructor vs assistant, associate, or full professor) across several US medical centers. METHODS: We randomly selected five academic medical centers from the US World News & Reports top 100 medical school rankings that had ID division websites including a faculty listing with ranks and years since graduation. We recorded each physician faculty’s rank and gender based on the written biography, using a validated tool (genderize.io) to determine gender if not given, and collected each faculty’s traditional bibliometric data via Google Scholar. RESULTS: We included 221 faculty (107 women) from five ID divisions (mean 44 faculty). Women accounted for 5/12 (42%) of instructors, 62/109 (57%) of assistant professors, 19/44 (43%) of associate professors, and 21/56 (38%) of full professors. Junior faculty women (instructor or assistant) had a median 0.6 potential same-gender senior mentors per mentee within their divisions versus 1.1 for men; associate professor women had a median 1.0 potential same-gender senior mentor per mentee versus 1.7 for men. Measures of academic productivity, such as annual publications, citations, and h-index growth since graduation from fellowship were similar between men and women. CONCLUSION: Our findings support published studies demonstrating lower proportions of women in successively senior positions within academic ID divisions despite similar scholarly activity and suggest that fewer within-institution opportunities for senior mentorship might be a contributing factor. DISCLOSURES: Andrea J. Zimmer, MD, Allovir: Grant/Research Support
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106782862023-11-27 882. Gender Disparities in Faculty Rank and Mentorship opportunities Within a Sample of US Academic Infectious Disease Divisions Hollenberg, Benjamin Cawcutt, Kelly Marcelin, Jasmine R Zimmer, Andrea J Cortes-Penfield, Nicolas W Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Gender inequities in promotion within academic medicine, including academic infectious diseases (ID), are well-documented. Effective mentorship is a key component of career advancement and data show that same-gender mentorship can be valuable for women junior faculty learning to navigate academia. We compared the gender, bibliometrics, and mentorship opportunity distributions of ID faculty at each academic rank (instructor vs assistant, associate, or full professor) across several US medical centers. METHODS: We randomly selected five academic medical centers from the US World News & Reports top 100 medical school rankings that had ID division websites including a faculty listing with ranks and years since graduation. We recorded each physician faculty’s rank and gender based on the written biography, using a validated tool (genderize.io) to determine gender if not given, and collected each faculty’s traditional bibliometric data via Google Scholar. RESULTS: We included 221 faculty (107 women) from five ID divisions (mean 44 faculty). Women accounted for 5/12 (42%) of instructors, 62/109 (57%) of assistant professors, 19/44 (43%) of associate professors, and 21/56 (38%) of full professors. Junior faculty women (instructor or assistant) had a median 0.6 potential same-gender senior mentors per mentee within their divisions versus 1.1 for men; associate professor women had a median 1.0 potential same-gender senior mentor per mentee versus 1.7 for men. Measures of academic productivity, such as annual publications, citations, and h-index growth since graduation from fellowship were similar between men and women. CONCLUSION: Our findings support published studies demonstrating lower proportions of women in successively senior positions within academic ID divisions despite similar scholarly activity and suggest that fewer within-institution opportunities for senior mentorship might be a contributing factor. DISCLOSURES: Andrea J. Zimmer, MD, Allovir: Grant/Research Support Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678286/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.927 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Hollenberg, Benjamin
Cawcutt, Kelly
Marcelin, Jasmine R
Zimmer, Andrea J
Cortes-Penfield, Nicolas W
882. Gender Disparities in Faculty Rank and Mentorship opportunities Within a Sample of US Academic Infectious Disease Divisions
title 882. Gender Disparities in Faculty Rank and Mentorship opportunities Within a Sample of US Academic Infectious Disease Divisions
title_full 882. Gender Disparities in Faculty Rank and Mentorship opportunities Within a Sample of US Academic Infectious Disease Divisions
title_fullStr 882. Gender Disparities in Faculty Rank and Mentorship opportunities Within a Sample of US Academic Infectious Disease Divisions
title_full_unstemmed 882. Gender Disparities in Faculty Rank and Mentorship opportunities Within a Sample of US Academic Infectious Disease Divisions
title_short 882. Gender Disparities in Faculty Rank and Mentorship opportunities Within a Sample of US Academic Infectious Disease Divisions
title_sort 882. gender disparities in faculty rank and mentorship opportunities within a sample of us academic infectious disease divisions
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678286/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.927
work_keys_str_mv AT hollenbergbenjamin 882genderdisparitiesinfacultyrankandmentorshipopportunitieswithinasampleofusacademicinfectiousdiseasedivisions
AT cawcuttkelly 882genderdisparitiesinfacultyrankandmentorshipopportunitieswithinasampleofusacademicinfectiousdiseasedivisions
AT marcelinjasminer 882genderdisparitiesinfacultyrankandmentorshipopportunitieswithinasampleofusacademicinfectiousdiseasedivisions
AT zimmerandreaj 882genderdisparitiesinfacultyrankandmentorshipopportunitieswithinasampleofusacademicinfectiousdiseasedivisions
AT cortespenfieldnicolasw 882genderdisparitiesinfacultyrankandmentorshipopportunitieswithinasampleofusacademicinfectiousdiseasedivisions