Cargando…
Gender inequality in cum laude distinctions for PhD students
Resource allocation in academia is highly skewed, and peer evaluation is the main method used to distribute scarce resources. A large literature documents gender inequality in evaluation, and the explanation for this inequality is homophily: male evaluators give more favorable ratings to male candid...
Autor principal: | Bol, Thijs |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38030662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46375-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Time-to-Credit Gender Inequities of First-Year PhD Students in the Biological Sciences
por: Feldon, David F., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Correction for Time-to-Credit Gender Inequities of First-Year PhD Students in the Biological Sciences
Publicado: (2017) -
Science and Engineering Ph.D. Students’ Career Outcomes, by Gender
por: Conti, Annamaria, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Making it to the PhD: Gender and student performance in sub-Saharan Africa
por: Fisher, Monica, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Códice Laud.
Publicado: (1994)