Cargando…

Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment

The popularity of biological origin food protection substances is driven by demands from consumers for natural and clean label product, increasing various food‐related safety and health concerns and sustainability issues. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are most promising because they are a large group o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zabulionė, Aelita, Valdramidis, Vasilis P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38047135
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.e211017
_version_ 1785152034352136192
author Zabulionė, Aelita
Valdramidis, Vasilis P
author_facet Zabulionė, Aelita
Valdramidis, Vasilis P
author_sort Zabulionė, Aelita
collection PubMed
description The popularity of biological origin food protection substances is driven by demands from consumers for natural and clean label product, increasing various food‐related safety and health concerns and sustainability issues. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are most promising because they are a large group of beneficial microorganisms commonly used in food protection due to their ability to inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria and enhance food safety. Extensive scientific research has been conducted to understand the mechanisms by which LAB exert their protective effects in various food systems. Even though LAB activity against various food pathogens and spoilers is distinguished, use of cell‐free supernatant (CFS) is still under investigation. This report is dedicated to present how qualitative measures can elaborate in new bacteria‐origin food additive investigation. As part of the EU‐FORA programme, the fellow was involved in the risk assessment tasks and projects which include gaining basic knowledge in predicative microbiology fundamentals, including different types of modelling strategies; delivering essential understanding about experimental design, knowledge in three specific software tools (MATLAB, GInaFiT and DMFit) and gained overall understanding what are the main differences while modelling growth or inactivation models. Secondary activities were included as a way to expand competences beyond qualitative measures to overall all activities done regarding risk assessment and build a strong network of food safety experts and professionals to continue engaging in risk assessment beyond fellowship programme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10687751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106877512023-12-01 Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment Zabulionė, Aelita Valdramidis, Vasilis P EFSA J Eu‐fora Series 6 The popularity of biological origin food protection substances is driven by demands from consumers for natural and clean label product, increasing various food‐related safety and health concerns and sustainability issues. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are most promising because they are a large group of beneficial microorganisms commonly used in food protection due to their ability to inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria and enhance food safety. Extensive scientific research has been conducted to understand the mechanisms by which LAB exert their protective effects in various food systems. Even though LAB activity against various food pathogens and spoilers is distinguished, use of cell‐free supernatant (CFS) is still under investigation. This report is dedicated to present how qualitative measures can elaborate in new bacteria‐origin food additive investigation. As part of the EU‐FORA programme, the fellow was involved in the risk assessment tasks and projects which include gaining basic knowledge in predicative microbiology fundamentals, including different types of modelling strategies; delivering essential understanding about experimental design, knowledge in three specific software tools (MATLAB, GInaFiT and DMFit) and gained overall understanding what are the main differences while modelling growth or inactivation models. Secondary activities were included as a way to expand competences beyond qualitative measures to overall all activities done regarding risk assessment and build a strong network of food safety experts and professionals to continue engaging in risk assessment beyond fellowship programme. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10687751/ /pubmed/38047135 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.e211017 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Eu‐fora Series 6
Zabulionė, Aelita
Valdramidis, Vasilis P
Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
title Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
title_full Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
title_fullStr Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
title_short Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
title_sort quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
topic Eu‐fora Series 6
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38047135
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.e211017
work_keys_str_mv AT zabulioneaelita quantitativetoolsinmicrobialandchemicalriskassessment
AT valdramidisvasilisp quantitativetoolsinmicrobialandchemicalriskassessment