Cargando…
Increased DNA microarray hybridization specificity using sscDNA targets
BACKGROUND: The most widely used amplification method for microarray analysis of gene expression uses T7 RNA polymerase-driven in vitro transcription (IVT) to produce complementary RNA (cRNA) that can be hybridized to arrays. However, multiple rounds of amplification are required when assaying very...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1090574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15847692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-6-57 |
_version_ | 1782123888737517568 |
---|---|
author | Barker, Christopher S Griffin, Chandi Dolganov, Gregory M Hanspers, Kristina Yang, Jean Yee Hwa Erle, David J |
author_facet | Barker, Christopher S Griffin, Chandi Dolganov, Gregory M Hanspers, Kristina Yang, Jean Yee Hwa Erle, David J |
author_sort | Barker, Christopher S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The most widely used amplification method for microarray analysis of gene expression uses T7 RNA polymerase-driven in vitro transcription (IVT) to produce complementary RNA (cRNA) that can be hybridized to arrays. However, multiple rounds of amplification are required when assaying very small amounts of starting RNA. Moreover, certain cRNA-DNA mismatches are more stable than the analogous cDNA-DNA mismatches and this might increase non-specific hybridization. We sought to determine whether a recently developed linear isothermal amplification method (ribo-SPIA) that produces single stranded cDNA would offer advantages over traditional IVT-based methods for microarray-based analyses of transcript expression. RESULTS: A single round of ribo-SPIA amplification produced sufficient sscDNA for hybridizations when as little as 5 ng of starting total RNA was used. Comparisons of probe set signal intensities obtained from replicate amplifications showed consistently high correlations (r = 0.99). We compared gene expression in two different human RNA samples using ribo-SPIA. Compared with one round IVT, ribo-SPIA had a larger dynamic range and correlated better with quantitative PCR results even though we used 1000-fold less starting RNA. The improved dynamic range was associated with decreases in hybridization to mismatch control probes. CONCLUSION: The use of amplified sscDNA may offer substantial advantages over IVT-based amplification methods, especially when very limited amounts of starting RNA are available. The use of sscDNA targets instead of cRNA targets appears to improve hybridization specificity. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1090574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-10905742005-05-07 Increased DNA microarray hybridization specificity using sscDNA targets Barker, Christopher S Griffin, Chandi Dolganov, Gregory M Hanspers, Kristina Yang, Jean Yee Hwa Erle, David J BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: The most widely used amplification method for microarray analysis of gene expression uses T7 RNA polymerase-driven in vitro transcription (IVT) to produce complementary RNA (cRNA) that can be hybridized to arrays. However, multiple rounds of amplification are required when assaying very small amounts of starting RNA. Moreover, certain cRNA-DNA mismatches are more stable than the analogous cDNA-DNA mismatches and this might increase non-specific hybridization. We sought to determine whether a recently developed linear isothermal amplification method (ribo-SPIA) that produces single stranded cDNA would offer advantages over traditional IVT-based methods for microarray-based analyses of transcript expression. RESULTS: A single round of ribo-SPIA amplification produced sufficient sscDNA for hybridizations when as little as 5 ng of starting total RNA was used. Comparisons of probe set signal intensities obtained from replicate amplifications showed consistently high correlations (r = 0.99). We compared gene expression in two different human RNA samples using ribo-SPIA. Compared with one round IVT, ribo-SPIA had a larger dynamic range and correlated better with quantitative PCR results even though we used 1000-fold less starting RNA. The improved dynamic range was associated with decreases in hybridization to mismatch control probes. CONCLUSION: The use of amplified sscDNA may offer substantial advantages over IVT-based amplification methods, especially when very limited amounts of starting RNA are available. The use of sscDNA targets instead of cRNA targets appears to improve hybridization specificity. BioMed Central 2005-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC1090574/ /pubmed/15847692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-6-57 Text en Copyright © 2005 Barker et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Barker, Christopher S Griffin, Chandi Dolganov, Gregory M Hanspers, Kristina Yang, Jean Yee Hwa Erle, David J Increased DNA microarray hybridization specificity using sscDNA targets |
title | Increased DNA microarray hybridization specificity using sscDNA targets |
title_full | Increased DNA microarray hybridization specificity using sscDNA targets |
title_fullStr | Increased DNA microarray hybridization specificity using sscDNA targets |
title_full_unstemmed | Increased DNA microarray hybridization specificity using sscDNA targets |
title_short | Increased DNA microarray hybridization specificity using sscDNA targets |
title_sort | increased dna microarray hybridization specificity using sscdna targets |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1090574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15847692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-6-57 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barkerchristophers increaseddnamicroarrayhybridizationspecificityusingsscdnatargets AT griffinchandi increaseddnamicroarrayhybridizationspecificityusingsscdnatargets AT dolganovgregorym increaseddnamicroarrayhybridizationspecificityusingsscdnatargets AT hansperskristina increaseddnamicroarrayhybridizationspecificityusingsscdnatargets AT yangjeanyeehwa increaseddnamicroarrayhybridizationspecificityusingsscdnatargets AT erledavidj increaseddnamicroarrayhybridizationspecificityusingsscdnatargets |