Cargando…

Binding properties and evolution of homodimers in protein–protein interaction networks

We demonstrate that protein–protein interaction networks in several eukaryotic organisms contain significantly more self-interacting proteins than expected if such homodimers randomly appeared in the course of the evolution. We also show that on average homodimers have twice as many interaction part...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ispolatov, Iaroslav, Yuryev, Anton, Mazo, Ilya, Maslov, Sergei
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1160523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15983135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki678
_version_ 1782124397250740224
author Ispolatov, Iaroslav
Yuryev, Anton
Mazo, Ilya
Maslov, Sergei
author_facet Ispolatov, Iaroslav
Yuryev, Anton
Mazo, Ilya
Maslov, Sergei
author_sort Ispolatov, Iaroslav
collection PubMed
description We demonstrate that protein–protein interaction networks in several eukaryotic organisms contain significantly more self-interacting proteins than expected if such homodimers randomly appeared in the course of the evolution. We also show that on average homodimers have twice as many interaction partners than non-self-interacting proteins. More specifically, the likelihood of a protein to physically interact with itself was found to be proportional to the total number of its binding partners. These properties of dimers are in agreement with a phenomenological model, in which individual proteins differ from each other by the degree of their ‘stickiness’ or general propensity toward interaction with other proteins including oneself. A duplication of self-interacting proteins creates a pair of paralogous proteins interacting with each other. We show that such pairs occur more frequently than could be explained by pure chance alone. Similar to homodimers, proteins involved in heterodimers with their paralogs on average have twice as many interacting partners than the rest of the network. The likelihood of a pair of paralogous proteins to interact with each other was also shown to decrease with their sequence similarity. This points to the conclusion that most of interactions between paralogs are inherited from ancestral homodimeric proteins, rather than established de novo after duplication. We finally discuss possible implications of our empirical observations from functional and evolutionary standpoints.
format Text
id pubmed-1160523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11605232005-06-28 Binding properties and evolution of homodimers in protein–protein interaction networks Ispolatov, Iaroslav Yuryev, Anton Mazo, Ilya Maslov, Sergei Nucleic Acids Res Article We demonstrate that protein–protein interaction networks in several eukaryotic organisms contain significantly more self-interacting proteins than expected if such homodimers randomly appeared in the course of the evolution. We also show that on average homodimers have twice as many interaction partners than non-self-interacting proteins. More specifically, the likelihood of a protein to physically interact with itself was found to be proportional to the total number of its binding partners. These properties of dimers are in agreement with a phenomenological model, in which individual proteins differ from each other by the degree of their ‘stickiness’ or general propensity toward interaction with other proteins including oneself. A duplication of self-interacting proteins creates a pair of paralogous proteins interacting with each other. We show that such pairs occur more frequently than could be explained by pure chance alone. Similar to homodimers, proteins involved in heterodimers with their paralogs on average have twice as many interacting partners than the rest of the network. The likelihood of a pair of paralogous proteins to interact with each other was also shown to decrease with their sequence similarity. This points to the conclusion that most of interactions between paralogs are inherited from ancestral homodimeric proteins, rather than established de novo after duplication. We finally discuss possible implications of our empirical observations from functional and evolutionary standpoints. Oxford University Press 2005 2005-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC1160523/ /pubmed/15983135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki678 Text en © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved
spellingShingle Article
Ispolatov, Iaroslav
Yuryev, Anton
Mazo, Ilya
Maslov, Sergei
Binding properties and evolution of homodimers in protein–protein interaction networks
title Binding properties and evolution of homodimers in protein–protein interaction networks
title_full Binding properties and evolution of homodimers in protein–protein interaction networks
title_fullStr Binding properties and evolution of homodimers in protein–protein interaction networks
title_full_unstemmed Binding properties and evolution of homodimers in protein–protein interaction networks
title_short Binding properties and evolution of homodimers in protein–protein interaction networks
title_sort binding properties and evolution of homodimers in protein–protein interaction networks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1160523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15983135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki678
work_keys_str_mv AT ispolatoviaroslav bindingpropertiesandevolutionofhomodimersinproteinproteininteractionnetworks
AT yuryevanton bindingpropertiesandevolutionofhomodimersinproteinproteininteractionnetworks
AT mazoilya bindingpropertiesandevolutionofhomodimersinproteinproteininteractionnetworks
AT maslovsergei bindingpropertiesandevolutionofhomodimersinproteinproteininteractionnetworks