Cargando…

Molecular mechanisms of in vivo metal chelation: implications for clinical treatment of metal intoxications.

Successful in vivo chelation treatment of metal intoxication requires that a significant fraction of the administered chelator in fact chelate the toxic metal. This depends on metal, chelator, and organism-related factors (e.g., ionic diameter, ring size and deformability, hardness/softness of elect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersen, Ole, Aaseth, Jan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1241267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12426153
_version_ 1782125360493625344
author Andersen, Ole
Aaseth, Jan
author_facet Andersen, Ole
Aaseth, Jan
author_sort Andersen, Ole
collection PubMed
description Successful in vivo chelation treatment of metal intoxication requires that a significant fraction of the administered chelator in fact chelate the toxic metal. This depends on metal, chelator, and organism-related factors (e.g., ionic diameter, ring size and deformability, hardness/softness of electron donors and acceptors, route of administration, bioavailability, metabolism, organ and intra/extracellular compartmentalization, and excretion). In vivo chelation is not necessarily an equilibrium reaction, determined by the standard stability constant, because rate effects and ligand exchange reactions considerably influence complex formation. Hydrophilic chelators most effectively promote renal metal excretion, but they complex intracellular metal deposits inefficiently. Lipophilic chelators can decrease intracellular stores but may redistribute toxic metals to, for example, the brain. In chronic metal-induced disease, where life-long chelation may be necessary, possible toxicity or side effects of the administered chelator may be limiting. The metal selectivity of chelators is important because of the risk of depletion of the patient's stores of essential metals. Dimercaptosuccinic acid and dimercaptopropionic sulfonate have gained more general acceptance among clinicians, undoubtedly improving the management of many human metal intoxications, including lead, arsenic, and mercury compounds. Still, development of new safer chelators suited for long-term oral administration for chelation of metal deposits (mainly iron), is an important research challenge for the future.
format Text
id pubmed-1241267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12412672005-11-08 Molecular mechanisms of in vivo metal chelation: implications for clinical treatment of metal intoxications. Andersen, Ole Aaseth, Jan Environ Health Perspect Research Article Successful in vivo chelation treatment of metal intoxication requires that a significant fraction of the administered chelator in fact chelate the toxic metal. This depends on metal, chelator, and organism-related factors (e.g., ionic diameter, ring size and deformability, hardness/softness of electron donors and acceptors, route of administration, bioavailability, metabolism, organ and intra/extracellular compartmentalization, and excretion). In vivo chelation is not necessarily an equilibrium reaction, determined by the standard stability constant, because rate effects and ligand exchange reactions considerably influence complex formation. Hydrophilic chelators most effectively promote renal metal excretion, but they complex intracellular metal deposits inefficiently. Lipophilic chelators can decrease intracellular stores but may redistribute toxic metals to, for example, the brain. In chronic metal-induced disease, where life-long chelation may be necessary, possible toxicity or side effects of the administered chelator may be limiting. The metal selectivity of chelators is important because of the risk of depletion of the patient's stores of essential metals. Dimercaptosuccinic acid and dimercaptopropionic sulfonate have gained more general acceptance among clinicians, undoubtedly improving the management of many human metal intoxications, including lead, arsenic, and mercury compounds. Still, development of new safer chelators suited for long-term oral administration for chelation of metal deposits (mainly iron), is an important research challenge for the future. 2002-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1241267/ /pubmed/12426153 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Andersen, Ole
Aaseth, Jan
Molecular mechanisms of in vivo metal chelation: implications for clinical treatment of metal intoxications.
title Molecular mechanisms of in vivo metal chelation: implications for clinical treatment of metal intoxications.
title_full Molecular mechanisms of in vivo metal chelation: implications for clinical treatment of metal intoxications.
title_fullStr Molecular mechanisms of in vivo metal chelation: implications for clinical treatment of metal intoxications.
title_full_unstemmed Molecular mechanisms of in vivo metal chelation: implications for clinical treatment of metal intoxications.
title_short Molecular mechanisms of in vivo metal chelation: implications for clinical treatment of metal intoxications.
title_sort molecular mechanisms of in vivo metal chelation: implications for clinical treatment of metal intoxications.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1241267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12426153
work_keys_str_mv AT andersenole molecularmechanismsofinvivometalchelationimplicationsforclinicaltreatmentofmetalintoxications
AT aasethjan molecularmechanismsofinvivometalchelationimplicationsforclinicaltreatmentofmetalintoxications