Cargando…

Mercury in Commercial Fish: Optimizing Individual Choices to Reduce Risk

Most attention to the risks from fish consumption has focused on recreational anglers and on fish caught by individuals, but the majority of fish that people eat are purchased from commercial sources. We examined mercury levels in three types of fish (tuna, flounder, bluefish) commonly available in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burger, Joanna, Stern, Alan H., Gochfeld, Michael
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institue of Environmental Health Sciences 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1253750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15743713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7315
_version_ 1782125774632910848
author Burger, Joanna
Stern, Alan H.
Gochfeld, Michael
author_facet Burger, Joanna
Stern, Alan H.
Gochfeld, Michael
author_sort Burger, Joanna
collection PubMed
description Most attention to the risks from fish consumption has focused on recreational anglers and on fish caught by individuals, but the majority of fish that people eat are purchased from commercial sources. We examined mercury levels in three types of fish (tuna, flounder, bluefish) commonly available in New Jersey stores, sampling different regions of the state, in communities with high and low per capita incomes, and in both supermarkets and specialty fish markets. We were interested in species-specific levels of mercury in New Jersey fish and whether these levels were similar to data generated nationally by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA; mainly from 1990 to 1992) on the same types of fish. Such information is critical for providing public health advice. We were also interested in whether mercury levels in three common species of fish differed by region of the state, economic neighborhood, or type of store. We found significant species differences, with tuna having the highest levels and flounder the lowest levels. There were no significant differences in mercury levels as a function of type of store or economic neighborhood. There was only one regional difference: flounder from fish markets along the Jersey shore had higher mercury levels than flounder bought in other markets. We also examined mercury levels in six other commonly available fish and two shellfish from central New Jersey markets. There were significant differences in availability and in mercury levels among fish and shellfish. Both shrimp and scallops had total mercury levels < 0.02 ppm (wet weight). Large shrimp had significantly lower levels of mercury than small shrimp. For tuna, sea bass, croaker, whiting, scallops, and shrimp, the levels of mercury were higher in New Jersey samples than those reported by the FDA. Consumers selecting fish for ease of availability (present in > 50% of markets) would select flounder, snapper, bluefish, and tuna (tuna had the highest mercury value), and those selecting only for price would select whiting, porgy, croaker, and bluefish (all with average mercury levels < 0.3 ppm wet weight). Flounder was the fish with the best relationship among availability, cost, and low mercury levels. We suggest that state agencies responsible for protecting the health of their citizens should obtain information on fish availability in markets and fish preferences of diverse groups of citizens and use this information to select fish for analysis of contaminant levels, providing data on the most commonly eaten fish that will help people make informed decisions about risks from fish consumption.
format Text
id pubmed-1253750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher National Institue of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12537502005-11-08 Mercury in Commercial Fish: Optimizing Individual Choices to Reduce Risk Burger, Joanna Stern, Alan H. Gochfeld, Michael Environ Health Perspect Research Most attention to the risks from fish consumption has focused on recreational anglers and on fish caught by individuals, but the majority of fish that people eat are purchased from commercial sources. We examined mercury levels in three types of fish (tuna, flounder, bluefish) commonly available in New Jersey stores, sampling different regions of the state, in communities with high and low per capita incomes, and in both supermarkets and specialty fish markets. We were interested in species-specific levels of mercury in New Jersey fish and whether these levels were similar to data generated nationally by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA; mainly from 1990 to 1992) on the same types of fish. Such information is critical for providing public health advice. We were also interested in whether mercury levels in three common species of fish differed by region of the state, economic neighborhood, or type of store. We found significant species differences, with tuna having the highest levels and flounder the lowest levels. There were no significant differences in mercury levels as a function of type of store or economic neighborhood. There was only one regional difference: flounder from fish markets along the Jersey shore had higher mercury levels than flounder bought in other markets. We also examined mercury levels in six other commonly available fish and two shellfish from central New Jersey markets. There were significant differences in availability and in mercury levels among fish and shellfish. Both shrimp and scallops had total mercury levels < 0.02 ppm (wet weight). Large shrimp had significantly lower levels of mercury than small shrimp. For tuna, sea bass, croaker, whiting, scallops, and shrimp, the levels of mercury were higher in New Jersey samples than those reported by the FDA. Consumers selecting fish for ease of availability (present in > 50% of markets) would select flounder, snapper, bluefish, and tuna (tuna had the highest mercury value), and those selecting only for price would select whiting, porgy, croaker, and bluefish (all with average mercury levels < 0.3 ppm wet weight). Flounder was the fish with the best relationship among availability, cost, and low mercury levels. We suggest that state agencies responsible for protecting the health of their citizens should obtain information on fish availability in markets and fish preferences of diverse groups of citizens and use this information to select fish for analysis of contaminant levels, providing data on the most commonly eaten fish that will help people make informed decisions about risks from fish consumption. National Institue of Environmental Health Sciences 2005-03 2004-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC1253750/ /pubmed/15743713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7315 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Research
Burger, Joanna
Stern, Alan H.
Gochfeld, Michael
Mercury in Commercial Fish: Optimizing Individual Choices to Reduce Risk
title Mercury in Commercial Fish: Optimizing Individual Choices to Reduce Risk
title_full Mercury in Commercial Fish: Optimizing Individual Choices to Reduce Risk
title_fullStr Mercury in Commercial Fish: Optimizing Individual Choices to Reduce Risk
title_full_unstemmed Mercury in Commercial Fish: Optimizing Individual Choices to Reduce Risk
title_short Mercury in Commercial Fish: Optimizing Individual Choices to Reduce Risk
title_sort mercury in commercial fish: optimizing individual choices to reduce risk
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1253750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15743713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7315
work_keys_str_mv AT burgerjoanna mercuryincommercialfishoptimizingindividualchoicestoreducerisk
AT sternalanh mercuryincommercialfishoptimizingindividualchoicestoreducerisk
AT gochfeldmichael mercuryincommercialfishoptimizingindividualchoicestoreducerisk