Cargando…
The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response
We determined the molecular mechanism of cell death response by MutS homologs in distinction to the repair event. Key protein–DNA contacts differ in the interaction of MutS homologs with cisplatinated versus mismatched DNA. Mutational analyses of protein–DNA contacts, which were predicted by molecul...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1450329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16648361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl238 |
_version_ | 1782127398836240384 |
---|---|
author | Salsbury, Freddie R. Clodfelter, Jill E. Gentry, Michael B. Hollis, Thomas Scarpinato, Karin Drotschmann |
author_facet | Salsbury, Freddie R. Clodfelter, Jill E. Gentry, Michael B. Hollis, Thomas Scarpinato, Karin Drotschmann |
author_sort | Salsbury, Freddie R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We determined the molecular mechanism of cell death response by MutS homologs in distinction to the repair event. Key protein–DNA contacts differ in the interaction of MutS homologs with cisplatinated versus mismatched DNA. Mutational analyses of protein–DNA contacts, which were predicted by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, were performed. Mutations in suggested interaction sites can affect repair and cell death response independently, and to different extents. A glutamate residue is identified as the key contact with cisplatin-DNA. Mutation of the residue increases cisplatin resistance due to increased non-specific DNA binding. In contrast, the conserved phenylalanine that is instrumental and indispensable for mismatch recognition during repair is not required for cisplatin cytotoxicity. These differences in protein–DNA interactions are translated into localized conformational changes that affect nucleotide requirements and inter-subunit interactions. Specifically, the ability for ATP binding/hydrolysis has little consequence for the MMR-dependent damage response. As a consequence, intersubunit contacts are altered that most likely affect the interaction with downstream proteins. We here describe the interaction of MutS homologs with DNA damage, as it differs from the interaction with a mismatch, and its structural translation into all other functional regions of the protein as a mechanism to initiate cell death response and concomitantly inhibit repair. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1450329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-14503292006-05-12 The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response Salsbury, Freddie R. Clodfelter, Jill E. Gentry, Michael B. Hollis, Thomas Scarpinato, Karin Drotschmann Nucleic Acids Res Article We determined the molecular mechanism of cell death response by MutS homologs in distinction to the repair event. Key protein–DNA contacts differ in the interaction of MutS homologs with cisplatinated versus mismatched DNA. Mutational analyses of protein–DNA contacts, which were predicted by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, were performed. Mutations in suggested interaction sites can affect repair and cell death response independently, and to different extents. A glutamate residue is identified as the key contact with cisplatin-DNA. Mutation of the residue increases cisplatin resistance due to increased non-specific DNA binding. In contrast, the conserved phenylalanine that is instrumental and indispensable for mismatch recognition during repair is not required for cisplatin cytotoxicity. These differences in protein–DNA interactions are translated into localized conformational changes that affect nucleotide requirements and inter-subunit interactions. Specifically, the ability for ATP binding/hydrolysis has little consequence for the MMR-dependent damage response. As a consequence, intersubunit contacts are altered that most likely affect the interaction with downstream proteins. We here describe the interaction of MutS homologs with DNA damage, as it differs from the interaction with a mismatch, and its structural translation into all other functional regions of the protein as a mechanism to initiate cell death response and concomitantly inhibit repair. Oxford University Press 2006 2006-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC1450329/ /pubmed/16648361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl238 Text en © The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved |
spellingShingle | Article Salsbury, Freddie R. Clodfelter, Jill E. Gentry, Michael B. Hollis, Thomas Scarpinato, Karin Drotschmann The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response |
title | The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response |
title_full | The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response |
title_fullStr | The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response |
title_full_unstemmed | The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response |
title_short | The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response |
title_sort | molecular mechanism of dna damage recognition by muts homologs and its consequences for cell death response |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1450329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16648361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salsburyfreddier themolecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse AT clodfelterjille themolecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse AT gentrymichaelb themolecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse AT hollisthomas themolecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse AT scarpinatokarindrotschmann themolecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse AT salsburyfreddier molecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse AT clodfelterjille molecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse AT gentrymichaelb molecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse AT hollisthomas molecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse AT scarpinatokarindrotschmann molecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse |