Cargando…

The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response

We determined the molecular mechanism of cell death response by MutS homologs in distinction to the repair event. Key protein–DNA contacts differ in the interaction of MutS homologs with cisplatinated versus mismatched DNA. Mutational analyses of protein–DNA contacts, which were predicted by molecul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salsbury, Freddie R., Clodfelter, Jill E., Gentry, Michael B., Hollis, Thomas, Scarpinato, Karin Drotschmann
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1450329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16648361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl238
_version_ 1782127398836240384
author Salsbury, Freddie R.
Clodfelter, Jill E.
Gentry, Michael B.
Hollis, Thomas
Scarpinato, Karin Drotschmann
author_facet Salsbury, Freddie R.
Clodfelter, Jill E.
Gentry, Michael B.
Hollis, Thomas
Scarpinato, Karin Drotschmann
author_sort Salsbury, Freddie R.
collection PubMed
description We determined the molecular mechanism of cell death response by MutS homologs in distinction to the repair event. Key protein–DNA contacts differ in the interaction of MutS homologs with cisplatinated versus mismatched DNA. Mutational analyses of protein–DNA contacts, which were predicted by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, were performed. Mutations in suggested interaction sites can affect repair and cell death response independently, and to different extents. A glutamate residue is identified as the key contact with cisplatin-DNA. Mutation of the residue increases cisplatin resistance due to increased non-specific DNA binding. In contrast, the conserved phenylalanine that is instrumental and indispensable for mismatch recognition during repair is not required for cisplatin cytotoxicity. These differences in protein–DNA interactions are translated into localized conformational changes that affect nucleotide requirements and inter-subunit interactions. Specifically, the ability for ATP binding/hydrolysis has little consequence for the MMR-dependent damage response. As a consequence, intersubunit contacts are altered that most likely affect the interaction with downstream proteins. We here describe the interaction of MutS homologs with DNA damage, as it differs from the interaction with a mismatch, and its structural translation into all other functional regions of the protein as a mechanism to initiate cell death response and concomitantly inhibit repair.
format Text
id pubmed-1450329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14503292006-05-12 The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response Salsbury, Freddie R. Clodfelter, Jill E. Gentry, Michael B. Hollis, Thomas Scarpinato, Karin Drotschmann Nucleic Acids Res Article We determined the molecular mechanism of cell death response by MutS homologs in distinction to the repair event. Key protein–DNA contacts differ in the interaction of MutS homologs with cisplatinated versus mismatched DNA. Mutational analyses of protein–DNA contacts, which were predicted by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, were performed. Mutations in suggested interaction sites can affect repair and cell death response independently, and to different extents. A glutamate residue is identified as the key contact with cisplatin-DNA. Mutation of the residue increases cisplatin resistance due to increased non-specific DNA binding. In contrast, the conserved phenylalanine that is instrumental and indispensable for mismatch recognition during repair is not required for cisplatin cytotoxicity. These differences in protein–DNA interactions are translated into localized conformational changes that affect nucleotide requirements and inter-subunit interactions. Specifically, the ability for ATP binding/hydrolysis has little consequence for the MMR-dependent damage response. As a consequence, intersubunit contacts are altered that most likely affect the interaction with downstream proteins. We here describe the interaction of MutS homologs with DNA damage, as it differs from the interaction with a mismatch, and its structural translation into all other functional regions of the protein as a mechanism to initiate cell death response and concomitantly inhibit repair. Oxford University Press 2006 2006-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC1450329/ /pubmed/16648361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl238 Text en © The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved
spellingShingle Article
Salsbury, Freddie R.
Clodfelter, Jill E.
Gentry, Michael B.
Hollis, Thomas
Scarpinato, Karin Drotschmann
The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response
title The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response
title_full The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response
title_fullStr The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response
title_full_unstemmed The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response
title_short The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response
title_sort molecular mechanism of dna damage recognition by muts homologs and its consequences for cell death response
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1450329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16648361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl238
work_keys_str_mv AT salsburyfreddier themolecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse
AT clodfelterjille themolecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse
AT gentrymichaelb themolecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse
AT hollisthomas themolecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse
AT scarpinatokarindrotschmann themolecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse
AT salsburyfreddier molecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse
AT clodfelterjille molecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse
AT gentrymichaelb molecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse
AT hollisthomas molecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse
AT scarpinatokarindrotschmann molecularmechanismofdnadamagerecognitionbymutshomologsanditsconsequencesforcelldeathresponse