Cargando…

Using ESTs to improve the accuracy of de novo gene prediction

BACKGROUND: ESTs are a tremendous resource for determining the exon-intron structures of genes, but even extensive EST sequencing tends to leave many exons and genes untouched. Gene prediction systems based exclusively on EST alignments miss these exons and genes, leading to poor sensitivity. De nov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Chaochun, Brent, Michael R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1534067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16817966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-327
_version_ 1782129099359125504
author Wei, Chaochun
Brent, Michael R
author_facet Wei, Chaochun
Brent, Michael R
author_sort Wei, Chaochun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: ESTs are a tremendous resource for determining the exon-intron structures of genes, but even extensive EST sequencing tends to leave many exons and genes untouched. Gene prediction systems based exclusively on EST alignments miss these exons and genes, leading to poor sensitivity. De novo gene prediction systems, which ignore ESTs in favor of genomic sequence, can predict such "untouched" exons, but they are less accurate when predicting exons to which ESTs align. TWINSCAN is the most accurate de novo gene finder available for nematodes and N-SCAN is the most accurate for mammals, as measured by exact CDS gene prediction and exact exon prediction. RESULTS: TWINSCAN_EST is a new system that successfully combines EST alignments with TWINSCAN. On the whole C. elegans genome TWINSCAN_EST shows 14% improvement in sensitivity and 13% in specificity in predicting exact gene structures compared to TWINSCAN without EST alignments. Not only are the structures revealed by EST alignments predicted correctly, but these also constrain the predictions without alignments, improving their accuracy. For the human genome, we used the same approach with N-SCAN, creating N-SCAN_EST. On the whole genome, N-SCAN_EST produced a 6% improvement in sensitivity and 1% in specificity of exact gene structure predictions compared to N-SCAN. CONCLUSION: TWINSCAN_EST and N-SCAN_EST are more accurate than TWINSCAN and N-SCAN, while retaining their ability to discover novel genes to which no ESTs align. Thus, we recommend using the EST versions of these programs to annotate any genome for which EST information is available. TWINSCAN_EST and N-SCAN_EST are part of the TWINSCAN open source software package .
format Text
id pubmed-1534067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15340672006-08-09 Using ESTs to improve the accuracy of de novo gene prediction Wei, Chaochun Brent, Michael R BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: ESTs are a tremendous resource for determining the exon-intron structures of genes, but even extensive EST sequencing tends to leave many exons and genes untouched. Gene prediction systems based exclusively on EST alignments miss these exons and genes, leading to poor sensitivity. De novo gene prediction systems, which ignore ESTs in favor of genomic sequence, can predict such "untouched" exons, but they are less accurate when predicting exons to which ESTs align. TWINSCAN is the most accurate de novo gene finder available for nematodes and N-SCAN is the most accurate for mammals, as measured by exact CDS gene prediction and exact exon prediction. RESULTS: TWINSCAN_EST is a new system that successfully combines EST alignments with TWINSCAN. On the whole C. elegans genome TWINSCAN_EST shows 14% improvement in sensitivity and 13% in specificity in predicting exact gene structures compared to TWINSCAN without EST alignments. Not only are the structures revealed by EST alignments predicted correctly, but these also constrain the predictions without alignments, improving their accuracy. For the human genome, we used the same approach with N-SCAN, creating N-SCAN_EST. On the whole genome, N-SCAN_EST produced a 6% improvement in sensitivity and 1% in specificity of exact gene structure predictions compared to N-SCAN. CONCLUSION: TWINSCAN_EST and N-SCAN_EST are more accurate than TWINSCAN and N-SCAN, while retaining their ability to discover novel genes to which no ESTs align. Thus, we recommend using the EST versions of these programs to annotate any genome for which EST information is available. TWINSCAN_EST and N-SCAN_EST are part of the TWINSCAN open source software package . BioMed Central 2006-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1534067/ /pubmed/16817966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-327 Text en Copyright © 2006 Wei and Brent; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wei, Chaochun
Brent, Michael R
Using ESTs to improve the accuracy of de novo gene prediction
title Using ESTs to improve the accuracy of de novo gene prediction
title_full Using ESTs to improve the accuracy of de novo gene prediction
title_fullStr Using ESTs to improve the accuracy of de novo gene prediction
title_full_unstemmed Using ESTs to improve the accuracy of de novo gene prediction
title_short Using ESTs to improve the accuracy of de novo gene prediction
title_sort using ests to improve the accuracy of de novo gene prediction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1534067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16817966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-327
work_keys_str_mv AT weichaochun usingeststoimprovetheaccuracyofdenovogeneprediction
AT brentmichaelr usingeststoimprovetheaccuracyofdenovogeneprediction