Cargando…

Similar folds with different stabilization mechanisms: the cases of prion and doppel proteins

BACKGROUND: Protein misfolding is the main cause of a group of fatal neurodegenerative diseases in humans and animals. In particular, in Prion-related diseases the normal cellular form of the Prion Protein PrP (PrP(C)) is converted into the infectious PrP(Sc )through a conformational process during...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colacino, Stefano, Tiana, Guido, Colombo, Giorgio
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1574322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16857062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-6-17
_version_ 1782130285876346880
author Colacino, Stefano
Tiana, Guido
Colombo, Giorgio
author_facet Colacino, Stefano
Tiana, Guido
Colombo, Giorgio
author_sort Colacino, Stefano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Protein misfolding is the main cause of a group of fatal neurodegenerative diseases in humans and animals. In particular, in Prion-related diseases the normal cellular form of the Prion Protein PrP (PrP(C)) is converted into the infectious PrP(Sc )through a conformational process during which it acquires a high β-sheet content. Doppel is a protein that shares a similar native fold, but lacks the scrapie isoform. Understanding the molecular determinants of these different behaviours is important both for biomedical and biophysical research. RESULTS: In this paper, the dynamical and energetic properties of the two proteins in solution is comparatively analyzed by means of long time scale explicit solvent, all-atom molecular dynamics in different temperature conditions. The trajectories are analyzed by means of a recently introduced energy decomposition approach (Tiana et al, Prot. Sci. 2004) aimed at identifying the key residues for the stabilization and folding of the protein. Our analysis shows that Prion and Doppel have two different cores stabilizing the native state and that the relative contribution of the nucleus to the global stability of the protein for Doppel is sensitively higher than for PrP. Moreover, under misfolding conditions the Doppel core is conserved, while the energy stabilization network of PrP is disrupted. CONCLUSION: These observations suggest that different sequences can share similar native topology with different stabilizing interactions and that the sequences of the Prion and Doppel proteins may have diverged under different evolutionary constraints resulting in different folding and stabilization mechanisms.
format Text
id pubmed-1574322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15743222006-09-25 Similar folds with different stabilization mechanisms: the cases of prion and doppel proteins Colacino, Stefano Tiana, Guido Colombo, Giorgio BMC Struct Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Protein misfolding is the main cause of a group of fatal neurodegenerative diseases in humans and animals. In particular, in Prion-related diseases the normal cellular form of the Prion Protein PrP (PrP(C)) is converted into the infectious PrP(Sc )through a conformational process during which it acquires a high β-sheet content. Doppel is a protein that shares a similar native fold, but lacks the scrapie isoform. Understanding the molecular determinants of these different behaviours is important both for biomedical and biophysical research. RESULTS: In this paper, the dynamical and energetic properties of the two proteins in solution is comparatively analyzed by means of long time scale explicit solvent, all-atom molecular dynamics in different temperature conditions. The trajectories are analyzed by means of a recently introduced energy decomposition approach (Tiana et al, Prot. Sci. 2004) aimed at identifying the key residues for the stabilization and folding of the protein. Our analysis shows that Prion and Doppel have two different cores stabilizing the native state and that the relative contribution of the nucleus to the global stability of the protein for Doppel is sensitively higher than for PrP. Moreover, under misfolding conditions the Doppel core is conserved, while the energy stabilization network of PrP is disrupted. CONCLUSION: These observations suggest that different sequences can share similar native topology with different stabilizing interactions and that the sequences of the Prion and Doppel proteins may have diverged under different evolutionary constraints resulting in different folding and stabilization mechanisms. BioMed Central 2006-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC1574322/ /pubmed/16857062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-6-17 Text en Copyright © 2006 Colacino et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Colacino, Stefano
Tiana, Guido
Colombo, Giorgio
Similar folds with different stabilization mechanisms: the cases of prion and doppel proteins
title Similar folds with different stabilization mechanisms: the cases of prion and doppel proteins
title_full Similar folds with different stabilization mechanisms: the cases of prion and doppel proteins
title_fullStr Similar folds with different stabilization mechanisms: the cases of prion and doppel proteins
title_full_unstemmed Similar folds with different stabilization mechanisms: the cases of prion and doppel proteins
title_short Similar folds with different stabilization mechanisms: the cases of prion and doppel proteins
title_sort similar folds with different stabilization mechanisms: the cases of prion and doppel proteins
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1574322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16857062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-6-17
work_keys_str_mv AT colacinostefano similarfoldswithdifferentstabilizationmechanismsthecasesofprionanddoppelproteins
AT tianaguido similarfoldswithdifferentstabilizationmechanismsthecasesofprionanddoppelproteins
AT colombogiorgio similarfoldswithdifferentstabilizationmechanismsthecasesofprionanddoppelproteins