Cargando…
Scanning sequences after Gibbs sampling to find multiple occurrences of functional elements
BACKGROUND: Many DNA regulatory elements occur as multiple instances within a target promoter. Gibbs sampling programs for finding DNA regulatory elements de novo can be prohibitively slow in locating all instances of such an element in a sequence set. RESULTS: We describe an improvement to the A-GL...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1599759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16961919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-408 |
_version_ | 1782130445091078144 |
---|---|
author | Tharakaraman, Kannan Mariño-Ramírez, Leonardo Sheetlin, Sergey L Landsman, David Spouge, John L |
author_facet | Tharakaraman, Kannan Mariño-Ramírez, Leonardo Sheetlin, Sergey L Landsman, David Spouge, John L |
author_sort | Tharakaraman, Kannan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many DNA regulatory elements occur as multiple instances within a target promoter. Gibbs sampling programs for finding DNA regulatory elements de novo can be prohibitively slow in locating all instances of such an element in a sequence set. RESULTS: We describe an improvement to the A-GLAM computer program, which predicts regulatory elements within DNA sequences with Gibbs sampling. The improvement adds an optional "scanning step" after Gibbs sampling. Gibbs sampling produces a position specific scoring matrix (PSSM). The new scanning step resembles an iterative PSI-BLAST search based on the PSSM. First, it assigns an "individual score" to each subsequence of appropriate length within the input sequences using the initial PSSM. Second, it computes an E-value from each individual score, to assess the agreement between the corresponding subsequence and the PSSM. Third, it permits subsequences with E-values falling below a threshold to contribute to the underlying PSSM, which is then updated using the Bayesian calculus. A-GLAM iterates its scanning step to convergence, at which point no new subsequences contribute to the PSSM. After convergence, A-GLAM reports predicted regulatory elements within each sequence in order of increasing E-values, so users have a statistical evaluation of the predicted elements in a convenient presentation. Thus, although the Gibbs sampling step in A-GLAM finds at most one regulatory element per input sequence, the scanning step can now rapidly locate further instances of the element in each sequence. CONCLUSION: Datasets from experiments determining the binding sites of transcription factors were used to evaluate the improvement to A-GLAM. Typically, the datasets included several sequences containing multiple instances of a regulatory motif. The improvements to A-GLAM permitted it to predict the multiple instances. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1599759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15997592006-10-12 Scanning sequences after Gibbs sampling to find multiple occurrences of functional elements Tharakaraman, Kannan Mariño-Ramírez, Leonardo Sheetlin, Sergey L Landsman, David Spouge, John L BMC Bioinformatics Software BACKGROUND: Many DNA regulatory elements occur as multiple instances within a target promoter. Gibbs sampling programs for finding DNA regulatory elements de novo can be prohibitively slow in locating all instances of such an element in a sequence set. RESULTS: We describe an improvement to the A-GLAM computer program, which predicts regulatory elements within DNA sequences with Gibbs sampling. The improvement adds an optional "scanning step" after Gibbs sampling. Gibbs sampling produces a position specific scoring matrix (PSSM). The new scanning step resembles an iterative PSI-BLAST search based on the PSSM. First, it assigns an "individual score" to each subsequence of appropriate length within the input sequences using the initial PSSM. Second, it computes an E-value from each individual score, to assess the agreement between the corresponding subsequence and the PSSM. Third, it permits subsequences with E-values falling below a threshold to contribute to the underlying PSSM, which is then updated using the Bayesian calculus. A-GLAM iterates its scanning step to convergence, at which point no new subsequences contribute to the PSSM. After convergence, A-GLAM reports predicted regulatory elements within each sequence in order of increasing E-values, so users have a statistical evaluation of the predicted elements in a convenient presentation. Thus, although the Gibbs sampling step in A-GLAM finds at most one regulatory element per input sequence, the scanning step can now rapidly locate further instances of the element in each sequence. CONCLUSION: Datasets from experiments determining the binding sites of transcription factors were used to evaluate the improvement to A-GLAM. Typically, the datasets included several sequences containing multiple instances of a regulatory motif. The improvements to A-GLAM permitted it to predict the multiple instances. BioMed Central 2006-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC1599759/ /pubmed/16961919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-408 Text en Copyright © 2006 Tharakaraman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Software Tharakaraman, Kannan Mariño-Ramírez, Leonardo Sheetlin, Sergey L Landsman, David Spouge, John L Scanning sequences after Gibbs sampling to find multiple occurrences of functional elements |
title | Scanning sequences after Gibbs sampling to find multiple occurrences of functional elements |
title_full | Scanning sequences after Gibbs sampling to find multiple occurrences of functional elements |
title_fullStr | Scanning sequences after Gibbs sampling to find multiple occurrences of functional elements |
title_full_unstemmed | Scanning sequences after Gibbs sampling to find multiple occurrences of functional elements |
title_short | Scanning sequences after Gibbs sampling to find multiple occurrences of functional elements |
title_sort | scanning sequences after gibbs sampling to find multiple occurrences of functional elements |
topic | Software |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1599759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16961919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-408 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tharakaramankannan scanningsequencesaftergibbssamplingtofindmultipleoccurrencesoffunctionalelements AT marinoramirezleonardo scanningsequencesaftergibbssamplingtofindmultipleoccurrencesoffunctionalelements AT sheetlinsergeyl scanningsequencesaftergibbssamplingtofindmultipleoccurrencesoffunctionalelements AT landsmandavid scanningsequencesaftergibbssamplingtofindmultipleoccurrencesoffunctionalelements AT spougejohnl scanningsequencesaftergibbssamplingtofindmultipleoccurrencesoffunctionalelements |