Cargando…

Design of Phase II cancer trials evaluating survival probabilities

BACKGROUND: Phase II cancer studies are undertaken to assess the activity of a new drug or a new treatment regimen. Activity is sometimes defined in terms of a survival probability, a binary outcome such as one-year survival that is derived from a time-to-event variable. Phase II studies are usually...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Case, L Douglas, Morgan, Timothy M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC161809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12697051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-6
_version_ 1782120807164542976
author Case, L Douglas
Morgan, Timothy M
author_facet Case, L Douglas
Morgan, Timothy M
author_sort Case, L Douglas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Phase II cancer studies are undertaken to assess the activity of a new drug or a new treatment regimen. Activity is sometimes defined in terms of a survival probability, a binary outcome such as one-year survival that is derived from a time-to-event variable. Phase II studies are usually designed with an interim analysis so they can be stopped if early results are disappointing. Most designs that allow for an interim look are not appropriate for monitoring survival probabilities since many patients will not have enough follow-up by the time of the interim analysis, thus necessitating an inconvenient suspension of accrual while patients are being followed. METHODS: Two-stage phase II clinical trial designs are developed for evaluating survival probabilities. These designs are compared to fixed sample designs and to existing designs developed to monitor binomial probabilities to illustrate the expected reduction in sample size or study length possible with the use of the proposed designs. RESULTS: Savings can be realized in both the duration of accrual and the total study length, with the expected savings increasing as the accrual rate decreases. Misspecifying the underlying survival distribution and the accrual rate during the planning phase can adversely influence the operating characteristics of the designs. CONCLUSION: Two-stage phase II trials for assessing survival probabilities can be designed that do not require prolonged suspension of patient accrual. These designs are more efficient than single stage designs and more practical than existing two-stage designs developed for binomial outcomes, particularly in trials with slow accrual.
format Text
id pubmed-161809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1618092003-06-20 Design of Phase II cancer trials evaluating survival probabilities Case, L Douglas Morgan, Timothy M BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Phase II cancer studies are undertaken to assess the activity of a new drug or a new treatment regimen. Activity is sometimes defined in terms of a survival probability, a binary outcome such as one-year survival that is derived from a time-to-event variable. Phase II studies are usually designed with an interim analysis so they can be stopped if early results are disappointing. Most designs that allow for an interim look are not appropriate for monitoring survival probabilities since many patients will not have enough follow-up by the time of the interim analysis, thus necessitating an inconvenient suspension of accrual while patients are being followed. METHODS: Two-stage phase II clinical trial designs are developed for evaluating survival probabilities. These designs are compared to fixed sample designs and to existing designs developed to monitor binomial probabilities to illustrate the expected reduction in sample size or study length possible with the use of the proposed designs. RESULTS: Savings can be realized in both the duration of accrual and the total study length, with the expected savings increasing as the accrual rate decreases. Misspecifying the underlying survival distribution and the accrual rate during the planning phase can adversely influence the operating characteristics of the designs. CONCLUSION: Two-stage phase II trials for assessing survival probabilities can be designed that do not require prolonged suspension of patient accrual. These designs are more efficient than single stage designs and more practical than existing two-stage designs developed for binomial outcomes, particularly in trials with slow accrual. BioMed Central 2003-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC161809/ /pubmed/12697051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-6 Text en Copyright © 2003 Case and Morgan; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Case, L Douglas
Morgan, Timothy M
Design of Phase II cancer trials evaluating survival probabilities
title Design of Phase II cancer trials evaluating survival probabilities
title_full Design of Phase II cancer trials evaluating survival probabilities
title_fullStr Design of Phase II cancer trials evaluating survival probabilities
title_full_unstemmed Design of Phase II cancer trials evaluating survival probabilities
title_short Design of Phase II cancer trials evaluating survival probabilities
title_sort design of phase ii cancer trials evaluating survival probabilities
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC161809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12697051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-6
work_keys_str_mv AT caseldouglas designofphaseiicancertrialsevaluatingsurvivalprobabilities
AT morgantimothym designofphaseiicancertrialsevaluatingsurvivalprobabilities