Cargando…

Gaining insight into the Clinical Practice Guideline development processes: qualitative study in a workshop to implement the GRADE proposal in Spain

BACKGROUND: The GRADE method represents a new approach to grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in the preparation of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG). In the context of a pilot study to assess the implementability of the system in Spain, we considered it relevant to gain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calderón, Carlos, Rotaeche, Rafael, Etxebarria, Arritxu, Marzo, Mercé, Rico, Rosa, Barandiaran, Marta
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1626459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17059600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-138
_version_ 1782130602504355840
author Calderón, Carlos
Rotaeche, Rafael
Etxebarria, Arritxu
Marzo, Mercé
Rico, Rosa
Barandiaran, Marta
author_facet Calderón, Carlos
Rotaeche, Rafael
Etxebarria, Arritxu
Marzo, Mercé
Rico, Rosa
Barandiaran, Marta
author_sort Calderón, Carlos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The GRADE method represents a new approach to grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in the preparation of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG). In the context of a pilot study to assess the implementability of the system in Spain, we considered it relevant to gain an insight into the significance of the perceptions and attitudes expressed by the actual experts participating in the system try-out. METHODS: Qualitative research with an ethnographic approach, through non-participant observation and focus groups within the context of a consensus workshop in which 19 CPG experts participated to evaluate the GRADE proposal using 12 evidence tables taken from hypertension, asthma and arthritis CPGs. The interventions were recorded, under a guarantee of confidentiality. The transcriptions and field notes were analyzed, based on a sociological discourse analysis model, and the provisional findings were re-sent to participants in order to improve their validity. RESULTS: 1) Certain problems over procedure and terminology hindered the acceptance of this new method as a common reference system for the preparation of CPGs. 2). A greater closeness to clinical practice was accompanied by concerns over value judgments and subjectivity, with a demand for greater explicitness in the consensus process. 3). The type of "evidence" on which the guidelines are based, how and by whom the evidence is prepared, and what the role of the different actors should be, all constitute unresolved concerns in the CPG preparation and implementation processes. 4). The grading process is not neutral: professional background, prior experience and the degree of leadership all condition the participants' input and interactions. CONCLUSION: The findings obtained allow the quantitative evaluation to be better interpreted and, in turn, go beyond the particularities of the GRADE method. Adaptation to the complexities of clinical practice, the need for carefully designed multi-disciplinary work and the reflexivity present in the CPG preparation process, all represent lines of debate that are necessary to improve the CPG quality in the Spanish health care sector.
format Text
id pubmed-1626459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16264592006-10-28 Gaining insight into the Clinical Practice Guideline development processes: qualitative study in a workshop to implement the GRADE proposal in Spain Calderón, Carlos Rotaeche, Rafael Etxebarria, Arritxu Marzo, Mercé Rico, Rosa Barandiaran, Marta BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The GRADE method represents a new approach to grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in the preparation of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG). In the context of a pilot study to assess the implementability of the system in Spain, we considered it relevant to gain an insight into the significance of the perceptions and attitudes expressed by the actual experts participating in the system try-out. METHODS: Qualitative research with an ethnographic approach, through non-participant observation and focus groups within the context of a consensus workshop in which 19 CPG experts participated to evaluate the GRADE proposal using 12 evidence tables taken from hypertension, asthma and arthritis CPGs. The interventions were recorded, under a guarantee of confidentiality. The transcriptions and field notes were analyzed, based on a sociological discourse analysis model, and the provisional findings were re-sent to participants in order to improve their validity. RESULTS: 1) Certain problems over procedure and terminology hindered the acceptance of this new method as a common reference system for the preparation of CPGs. 2). A greater closeness to clinical practice was accompanied by concerns over value judgments and subjectivity, with a demand for greater explicitness in the consensus process. 3). The type of "evidence" on which the guidelines are based, how and by whom the evidence is prepared, and what the role of the different actors should be, all constitute unresolved concerns in the CPG preparation and implementation processes. 4). The grading process is not neutral: professional background, prior experience and the degree of leadership all condition the participants' input and interactions. CONCLUSION: The findings obtained allow the quantitative evaluation to be better interpreted and, in turn, go beyond the particularities of the GRADE method. Adaptation to the complexities of clinical practice, the need for carefully designed multi-disciplinary work and the reflexivity present in the CPG preparation process, all represent lines of debate that are necessary to improve the CPG quality in the Spanish health care sector. BioMed Central 2006-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC1626459/ /pubmed/17059600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-138 Text en Copyright © 2006 Calderón et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Calderón, Carlos
Rotaeche, Rafael
Etxebarria, Arritxu
Marzo, Mercé
Rico, Rosa
Barandiaran, Marta
Gaining insight into the Clinical Practice Guideline development processes: qualitative study in a workshop to implement the GRADE proposal in Spain
title Gaining insight into the Clinical Practice Guideline development processes: qualitative study in a workshop to implement the GRADE proposal in Spain
title_full Gaining insight into the Clinical Practice Guideline development processes: qualitative study in a workshop to implement the GRADE proposal in Spain
title_fullStr Gaining insight into the Clinical Practice Guideline development processes: qualitative study in a workshop to implement the GRADE proposal in Spain
title_full_unstemmed Gaining insight into the Clinical Practice Guideline development processes: qualitative study in a workshop to implement the GRADE proposal in Spain
title_short Gaining insight into the Clinical Practice Guideline development processes: qualitative study in a workshop to implement the GRADE proposal in Spain
title_sort gaining insight into the clinical practice guideline development processes: qualitative study in a workshop to implement the grade proposal in spain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1626459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17059600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-138
work_keys_str_mv AT calderoncarlos gaininginsightintotheclinicalpracticeguidelinedevelopmentprocessesqualitativestudyinaworkshoptoimplementthegradeproposalinspain
AT rotaecherafael gaininginsightintotheclinicalpracticeguidelinedevelopmentprocessesqualitativestudyinaworkshoptoimplementthegradeproposalinspain
AT etxebarriaarritxu gaininginsightintotheclinicalpracticeguidelinedevelopmentprocessesqualitativestudyinaworkshoptoimplementthegradeproposalinspain
AT marzomerce gaininginsightintotheclinicalpracticeguidelinedevelopmentprocessesqualitativestudyinaworkshoptoimplementthegradeproposalinspain
AT ricorosa gaininginsightintotheclinicalpracticeguidelinedevelopmentprocessesqualitativestudyinaworkshoptoimplementthegradeproposalinspain
AT barandiaranmarta gaininginsightintotheclinicalpracticeguidelinedevelopmentprocessesqualitativestudyinaworkshoptoimplementthegradeproposalinspain