Cargando…
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients
BACKGROUND: The choice of an evaluative instrument has been hampered by the lack of head-to-head comparisons of responsiveness and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in subpopulations of low back pain (LBP). The objective of this study was to concurrently compare responsiveness and M...
Autores principales: | Lauridsen, Henrik H, Hartvigsen, Jan, Manniche, Claus, Korsholm, Lars, Grunnet-Nilsson, Niels |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17064410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-82 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Trajectories of disability in low back pain
por: Andersen, Tonny E., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Nordic Walking and chronic low back pain: design of a randomized clinical trial
por: Morsø, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Supervised and non-supervised Nordic walking in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a single blind randomized clinical trial
por: Hartvigsen, Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
The patient enablement instrument for back pain: reliability, content validity, construct validity and responsiveness
por: Molgaard Nielsen, A., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The Online Patient Satisfaction Index for Patients With Low Back Pain: Development, Reliability, and Validation Study
por: Afzali, Tamana, et al.
Publicado: (2021)