Cargando…

Screening for Developmental Neurotoxicity Using PC12 Cells: Comparisons of Organophosphates with a Carbamate, an Organochlorine, and Divalent Nickel

BACKGROUND: In light of the large number of chemicals that are potential developmental neurotoxicants, there is a need to develop rapid screening techniques. OBJECTIVES: We exposed undifferentiated and differentiating neuronotypic PC12 cells to different organophosphates (chlorpyrifos, diazinon, par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slotkin, Theodore A., MacKillop, Emiko A., Ryde, Ian T., Tate, Charlotte A., Seidler, Frederic J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1797840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17366826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9527
_version_ 1782132324421337088
author Slotkin, Theodore A.
MacKillop, Emiko A.
Ryde, Ian T.
Tate, Charlotte A.
Seidler, Frederic J.
author_facet Slotkin, Theodore A.
MacKillop, Emiko A.
Ryde, Ian T.
Tate, Charlotte A.
Seidler, Frederic J.
author_sort Slotkin, Theodore A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In light of the large number of chemicals that are potential developmental neurotoxicants, there is a need to develop rapid screening techniques. OBJECTIVES: We exposed undifferentiated and differentiating neuronotypic PC12 cells to different organophosphates (chlorpyrifos, diazinon, parathion), a carbamate (physostigmine), an organochlorine (dieldrin), and a metal (divalent nickel; Ni(2+)) and examined indices of cell replication and differentiation for both short- and long-term exposures. RESULTS: In undifferentiated cells, all the agents inhibited DNA synthesis, with the greatest effect for diazinon, but physostigmine eventually produced the largest deficits in the total number of cells after prolonged exposure. The onset of differentiation intensified the adverse effects on DNA synthesis and changed the rank order in keeping with a shift away from noncholinergic mechanisms and toward cholinergic mechanisms. Differentiation also worsened the effects of each agent on cell number after prolonged exposure, whereas cell growth was not suppressed, nor were there any effects on viability as assessed with trypan blue. Nevertheless, differentiating cells displayed signs of oxidative stress from all of the test compounds except Ni(2+), as evidenced by measurements of lipid peroxidation. Finally, all of the toxicants shifted the transmitter fate of the cells away from the cholinergic phenotype and toward the catecholaminergic phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: These studies point out the feasibility of developing cell-based screening methods that enable the detection of multiple end points that may relate to mechanisms associated with developmental neurotoxicity, revealing some common targets for disparate agents.
format Text
id pubmed-1797840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17978402007-03-21 Screening for Developmental Neurotoxicity Using PC12 Cells: Comparisons of Organophosphates with a Carbamate, an Organochlorine, and Divalent Nickel Slotkin, Theodore A. MacKillop, Emiko A. Ryde, Ian T. Tate, Charlotte A. Seidler, Frederic J. Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: In light of the large number of chemicals that are potential developmental neurotoxicants, there is a need to develop rapid screening techniques. OBJECTIVES: We exposed undifferentiated and differentiating neuronotypic PC12 cells to different organophosphates (chlorpyrifos, diazinon, parathion), a carbamate (physostigmine), an organochlorine (dieldrin), and a metal (divalent nickel; Ni(2+)) and examined indices of cell replication and differentiation for both short- and long-term exposures. RESULTS: In undifferentiated cells, all the agents inhibited DNA synthesis, with the greatest effect for diazinon, but physostigmine eventually produced the largest deficits in the total number of cells after prolonged exposure. The onset of differentiation intensified the adverse effects on DNA synthesis and changed the rank order in keeping with a shift away from noncholinergic mechanisms and toward cholinergic mechanisms. Differentiation also worsened the effects of each agent on cell number after prolonged exposure, whereas cell growth was not suppressed, nor were there any effects on viability as assessed with trypan blue. Nevertheless, differentiating cells displayed signs of oxidative stress from all of the test compounds except Ni(2+), as evidenced by measurements of lipid peroxidation. Finally, all of the toxicants shifted the transmitter fate of the cells away from the cholinergic phenotype and toward the catecholaminergic phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: These studies point out the feasibility of developing cell-based screening methods that enable the detection of multiple end points that may relate to mechanisms associated with developmental neurotoxicity, revealing some common targets for disparate agents. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2007-01 2006-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC1797840/ /pubmed/17366826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9527 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Research
Slotkin, Theodore A.
MacKillop, Emiko A.
Ryde, Ian T.
Tate, Charlotte A.
Seidler, Frederic J.
Screening for Developmental Neurotoxicity Using PC12 Cells: Comparisons of Organophosphates with a Carbamate, an Organochlorine, and Divalent Nickel
title Screening for Developmental Neurotoxicity Using PC12 Cells: Comparisons of Organophosphates with a Carbamate, an Organochlorine, and Divalent Nickel
title_full Screening for Developmental Neurotoxicity Using PC12 Cells: Comparisons of Organophosphates with a Carbamate, an Organochlorine, and Divalent Nickel
title_fullStr Screening for Developmental Neurotoxicity Using PC12 Cells: Comparisons of Organophosphates with a Carbamate, an Organochlorine, and Divalent Nickel
title_full_unstemmed Screening for Developmental Neurotoxicity Using PC12 Cells: Comparisons of Organophosphates with a Carbamate, an Organochlorine, and Divalent Nickel
title_short Screening for Developmental Neurotoxicity Using PC12 Cells: Comparisons of Organophosphates with a Carbamate, an Organochlorine, and Divalent Nickel
title_sort screening for developmental neurotoxicity using pc12 cells: comparisons of organophosphates with a carbamate, an organochlorine, and divalent nickel
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1797840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17366826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9527
work_keys_str_mv AT slotkintheodorea screeningfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityusingpc12cellscomparisonsoforganophosphateswithacarbamateanorganochlorineanddivalentnickel
AT mackillopemikoa screeningfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityusingpc12cellscomparisonsoforganophosphateswithacarbamateanorganochlorineanddivalentnickel
AT rydeiant screeningfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityusingpc12cellscomparisonsoforganophosphateswithacarbamateanorganochlorineanddivalentnickel
AT tatecharlottea screeningfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityusingpc12cellscomparisonsoforganophosphateswithacarbamateanorganochlorineanddivalentnickel
AT seidlerfredericj screeningfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityusingpc12cellscomparisonsoforganophosphateswithacarbamateanorganochlorineanddivalentnickel