Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND: Although peer review is widely considered to be the most credible way of selecting manuscripts and improving the quality of accepted papers in scientific journals, there is little evidence to support its use. Our aim was to estimate the effects on manuscript quality of either adding a st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cobo, Erik, Selva-O'Callagham, Albert, Ribera, Josep-Maria, Cardellach, Francesc, Dominguez, Ruth, Vilardell, Miquel
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1824709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17389922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000332

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1824709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17389922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000332

Ejemplares similares