Cargando…
Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial
BACKGROUND: Although peer review is widely considered to be the most credible way of selecting manuscripts and improving the quality of accepted papers in scientific journals, there is little evidence to support its use. Our aim was to estimate the effects on manuscript quality of either adding a st...
Autores principales: | Cobo, Erik, Selva-O'Callagham, Albert, Ribera, Josep-Maria, Cardellach, Francesc, Dominguez, Ruth, Vilardell, Miquel |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1824709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17389922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000332 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Adherence to reporting guidelines increases the number of citations: the argument for including a methodologist in the editorial process and peer-review
por: Vilaró, Marta, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial
por: Cobo, E, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Nutrition, Bioenergetics, and Metabolic Syndrome
por: García-García, Francesc Josep, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Passage-Based Bibliographic Coupling: An Inter-Article Similarity Measure for Biomedical Articles
por: Liu, Rey-Long
Publicado: (2015) -
The Importance of Proper Citation of References in Biomedical Articles
por: Masic, Izet
Publicado: (2013)