Cargando…

Practice Inquiry: Clinical Uncertainty as a Focus for Small-Group Learning and Practice Improvement

PROBLEM: Many primary care physicians in nonacademic settings lack a collegial forum for engaging the clinical uncertainties inherent in their work. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: “Practice Inquiry” is proposed as a set of small-group, practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI) methods designed to help cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sommers, Lucia S., Morgan, Laura, Johnson, Lisa, Yatabe, Kay
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1824750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17356994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0059-2
_version_ 1782132700528771072
author Sommers, Lucia S.
Morgan, Laura
Johnson, Lisa
Yatabe, Kay
author_facet Sommers, Lucia S.
Morgan, Laura
Johnson, Lisa
Yatabe, Kay
author_sort Sommers, Lucia S.
collection PubMed
description PROBLEM: Many primary care physicians in nonacademic settings lack a collegial forum for engaging the clinical uncertainties inherent in their work. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: “Practice Inquiry” is proposed as a set of small-group, practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI) methods designed to help clinicians better manage case-based clinical uncertainty. Clinicians meet regularly at their offices/clinics to present dilemma cases, share clinical experience, review evidence for blending with experience, and draw implications for practice improvement. From 2001 through 2005, Practice Inquiry was introduced to sites in the San Francisco Bay Area as a demonstration effort. Meeting rosters, case logs, a feedback survey, and meeting field notes documented implementation and provided data for a formative, qualitative evaluation. PROGRAM EVALUATION: Of the 30 sites approached, 14 held introductory meetings. As of summer 2006, 98 clinicians in 11 sites continue to hold regularly scheduled group meetings. Of the 118 patient cases presented in the seven oldest groups, clinician–patient relationship and treatment dilemmas were most common. Clinician feedback and meeting transcript data provided insights into how busy practitioners shared cases, developed trust, and learned new knowledge/skills for moving forward with patients. DISCUSSION: Ongoing clinician involvement suggests that Practice Inquiry is a feasible, acceptable, and potentially useful set of PBLI methods. Two of the Practice Inquiry’s group learning tasks received comparatively less focus: integrating research evidence with clinical experience and tracking dilemma case outcomes. Future work should focus on reducing the methodological limitations of a demonstration effort and examining factors affecting clinician participation. Set-aside work time for clinicians, or other equally potent incentives, will be necessary for the further elaboration of these PBLI methods aimed at managing uncertainty.
format Text
id pubmed-1824750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18247502007-03-15 Practice Inquiry: Clinical Uncertainty as a Focus for Small-Group Learning and Practice Improvement Sommers, Lucia S. Morgan, Laura Johnson, Lisa Yatabe, Kay J Gen Intern Med Innovations in Education PROBLEM: Many primary care physicians in nonacademic settings lack a collegial forum for engaging the clinical uncertainties inherent in their work. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: “Practice Inquiry” is proposed as a set of small-group, practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI) methods designed to help clinicians better manage case-based clinical uncertainty. Clinicians meet regularly at their offices/clinics to present dilemma cases, share clinical experience, review evidence for blending with experience, and draw implications for practice improvement. From 2001 through 2005, Practice Inquiry was introduced to sites in the San Francisco Bay Area as a demonstration effort. Meeting rosters, case logs, a feedback survey, and meeting field notes documented implementation and provided data for a formative, qualitative evaluation. PROGRAM EVALUATION: Of the 30 sites approached, 14 held introductory meetings. As of summer 2006, 98 clinicians in 11 sites continue to hold regularly scheduled group meetings. Of the 118 patient cases presented in the seven oldest groups, clinician–patient relationship and treatment dilemmas were most common. Clinician feedback and meeting transcript data provided insights into how busy practitioners shared cases, developed trust, and learned new knowledge/skills for moving forward with patients. DISCUSSION: Ongoing clinician involvement suggests that Practice Inquiry is a feasible, acceptable, and potentially useful set of PBLI methods. Two of the Practice Inquiry’s group learning tasks received comparatively less focus: integrating research evidence with clinical experience and tracking dilemma case outcomes. Future work should focus on reducing the methodological limitations of a demonstration effort and examining factors affecting clinician participation. Set-aside work time for clinicians, or other equally potent incentives, will be necessary for the further elaboration of these PBLI methods aimed at managing uncertainty. Springer-Verlag 2007-01-26 2007-02 /pmc/articles/PMC1824750/ /pubmed/17356994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0059-2 Text en © Society of General Internal Medicine 2007
spellingShingle Innovations in Education
Sommers, Lucia S.
Morgan, Laura
Johnson, Lisa
Yatabe, Kay
Practice Inquiry: Clinical Uncertainty as a Focus for Small-Group Learning and Practice Improvement
title Practice Inquiry: Clinical Uncertainty as a Focus for Small-Group Learning and Practice Improvement
title_full Practice Inquiry: Clinical Uncertainty as a Focus for Small-Group Learning and Practice Improvement
title_fullStr Practice Inquiry: Clinical Uncertainty as a Focus for Small-Group Learning and Practice Improvement
title_full_unstemmed Practice Inquiry: Clinical Uncertainty as a Focus for Small-Group Learning and Practice Improvement
title_short Practice Inquiry: Clinical Uncertainty as a Focus for Small-Group Learning and Practice Improvement
title_sort practice inquiry: clinical uncertainty as a focus for small-group learning and practice improvement
topic Innovations in Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1824750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17356994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0059-2
work_keys_str_mv AT sommerslucias practiceinquiryclinicaluncertaintyasafocusforsmallgrouplearningandpracticeimprovement
AT morganlaura practiceinquiryclinicaluncertaintyasafocusforsmallgrouplearningandpracticeimprovement
AT johnsonlisa practiceinquiryclinicaluncertaintyasafocusforsmallgrouplearningandpracticeimprovement
AT yatabekay practiceinquiryclinicaluncertaintyasafocusforsmallgrouplearningandpracticeimprovement