Cargando…

Protecting exons from deleterious R-loops: a potential advantage of having introns

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence indicates that the nascent RNA can invade and pair with one strand of DNA, forming an R-loop structure that threatens the stability of the genome. In addition, the cost and benefit of introns are still in debate. RESULTS: At least three factors are likely required f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Niu, Deng-Ke
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1863416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17459149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-2-11
_version_ 1782133194798137344
author Niu, Deng-Ke
author_facet Niu, Deng-Ke
author_sort Niu, Deng-Ke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence indicates that the nascent RNA can invade and pair with one strand of DNA, forming an R-loop structure that threatens the stability of the genome. In addition, the cost and benefit of introns are still in debate. RESULTS: At least three factors are likely required for the R-loop formation: 1) sequence complementarity between the nascent RNA and the target DNA, 2) spatial juxtaposition between the nascent RNA and the template DNA, and 3) accessibility of the template DNA and the nascent RNA. The removal of introns from pre-mRNA reduces the complementarity between RNA and the template DNA and avoids the spatial juxtaposition between the nascent RNA and the template DNA. In addition, the secondary structures of group I and group II introns may act as spatial obstacles for the formation of R-loops between nearby exons and the genomic DNA. CONCLUSION: Organisms may benefit from introns by avoiding deleterious R-loops. The potential contribution of this benefit in driving intron evolution is discussed. I propose that additional RNA polymerases may inhibit R-loop formation between preceding nascent RNA and the template DNA. This idea leads to a testable prediction: intermittently transcribed genes and genes with frequently prolonged transcription should have higher intron density. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Dr. Eugene V. Koonin, Dr. Alexei Fedorov (nominated by Dr. Laura F Landweber), and Dr. Scott W. Roy (nominated by Dr. Arcady Mushegian).
format Text
id pubmed-1863416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18634162007-05-03 Protecting exons from deleterious R-loops: a potential advantage of having introns Niu, Deng-Ke Biol Direct Hypothesis BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence indicates that the nascent RNA can invade and pair with one strand of DNA, forming an R-loop structure that threatens the stability of the genome. In addition, the cost and benefit of introns are still in debate. RESULTS: At least three factors are likely required for the R-loop formation: 1) sequence complementarity between the nascent RNA and the target DNA, 2) spatial juxtaposition between the nascent RNA and the template DNA, and 3) accessibility of the template DNA and the nascent RNA. The removal of introns from pre-mRNA reduces the complementarity between RNA and the template DNA and avoids the spatial juxtaposition between the nascent RNA and the template DNA. In addition, the secondary structures of group I and group II introns may act as spatial obstacles for the formation of R-loops between nearby exons and the genomic DNA. CONCLUSION: Organisms may benefit from introns by avoiding deleterious R-loops. The potential contribution of this benefit in driving intron evolution is discussed. I propose that additional RNA polymerases may inhibit R-loop formation between preceding nascent RNA and the template DNA. This idea leads to a testable prediction: intermittently transcribed genes and genes with frequently prolonged transcription should have higher intron density. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Dr. Eugene V. Koonin, Dr. Alexei Fedorov (nominated by Dr. Laura F Landweber), and Dr. Scott W. Roy (nominated by Dr. Arcady Mushegian). BioMed Central 2007-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC1863416/ /pubmed/17459149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-2-11 Text en Copyright © 2007 Niu; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Hypothesis
Niu, Deng-Ke
Protecting exons from deleterious R-loops: a potential advantage of having introns
title Protecting exons from deleterious R-loops: a potential advantage of having introns
title_full Protecting exons from deleterious R-loops: a potential advantage of having introns
title_fullStr Protecting exons from deleterious R-loops: a potential advantage of having introns
title_full_unstemmed Protecting exons from deleterious R-loops: a potential advantage of having introns
title_short Protecting exons from deleterious R-loops: a potential advantage of having introns
title_sort protecting exons from deleterious r-loops: a potential advantage of having introns
topic Hypothesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1863416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17459149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-2-11
work_keys_str_mv AT niudengke protectingexonsfromdeleteriousrloopsapotentialadvantageofhavingintrons