Cargando…

Control of interjoint coordination during the swing phase of normal gait at different speeds

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the control of unconstrained movements is simplified via the imposition of a kinetic constraint that produces dynamic torques at each moving joint such that they are a linear function of a single motor command. The linear relationship between dynamic torques at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shemmell, Jonathan, Johansson, Jennifer, Portra, Vanessa, Gottlieb, Gerald L, Thomas, James S, Corcos, Daniel M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17466065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-10
_version_ 1782133252286316544
author Shemmell, Jonathan
Johansson, Jennifer
Portra, Vanessa
Gottlieb, Gerald L
Thomas, James S
Corcos, Daniel M
author_facet Shemmell, Jonathan
Johansson, Jennifer
Portra, Vanessa
Gottlieb, Gerald L
Thomas, James S
Corcos, Daniel M
author_sort Shemmell, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the control of unconstrained movements is simplified via the imposition of a kinetic constraint that produces dynamic torques at each moving joint such that they are a linear function of a single motor command. The linear relationship between dynamic torques at each joint has been demonstrated for multijoint upper limb movements. The purpose of the current study was to test the applicability of such a control scheme to the unconstrained portion of the gait cycle – the swing phase. METHODS: Twenty-eight neurologically normal individuals walked along a track at three different speeds. Angular displacements and dynamic torques produced at each of the three lower limb joints (hip, knee and ankle) were calculated from segmental position data recorded during each trial. We employed principal component (PC) analysis to determine (1) the similarity of kinematic and kinetic time series at the ankle, knee and hip during the swing phase of gait, and (2) the effect of walking speed on the range of joint displacement and torque. RESULTS: The angular displacements of the three joints were accounted for by two PCs during the swing phase (Variance accounted for – PC1: 75.1 ± 1.4%, PC2: 23.2 ± 1.3%), whereas the dynamic joint torques were described by a single PC (Variance accounted for – PC1: 93.8 ± 0.9%). Increases in walking speed were associated with increases in the range of motion and magnitude of torque at each joint although the ratio describing the relative magnitude of torque at each joint remained constant. CONCLUSION: Our results support the idea that the control of leg swing during gait is simplified in two ways: (1) the pattern of dynamic torque at each lower limb joint is produced by appropriately scaling a single motor command and (2) the magnitude of dynamic torque at all three joints can be specified with knowledge of the magnitude of torque at a single joint. Walking speed could therefore be altered by modifying a single value related to the magnitude of torque at one joint.
format Text
id pubmed-1866234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18662342007-05-09 Control of interjoint coordination during the swing phase of normal gait at different speeds Shemmell, Jonathan Johansson, Jennifer Portra, Vanessa Gottlieb, Gerald L Thomas, James S Corcos, Daniel M J Neuroengineering Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the control of unconstrained movements is simplified via the imposition of a kinetic constraint that produces dynamic torques at each moving joint such that they are a linear function of a single motor command. The linear relationship between dynamic torques at each joint has been demonstrated for multijoint upper limb movements. The purpose of the current study was to test the applicability of such a control scheme to the unconstrained portion of the gait cycle – the swing phase. METHODS: Twenty-eight neurologically normal individuals walked along a track at three different speeds. Angular displacements and dynamic torques produced at each of the three lower limb joints (hip, knee and ankle) were calculated from segmental position data recorded during each trial. We employed principal component (PC) analysis to determine (1) the similarity of kinematic and kinetic time series at the ankle, knee and hip during the swing phase of gait, and (2) the effect of walking speed on the range of joint displacement and torque. RESULTS: The angular displacements of the three joints were accounted for by two PCs during the swing phase (Variance accounted for – PC1: 75.1 ± 1.4%, PC2: 23.2 ± 1.3%), whereas the dynamic joint torques were described by a single PC (Variance accounted for – PC1: 93.8 ± 0.9%). Increases in walking speed were associated with increases in the range of motion and magnitude of torque at each joint although the ratio describing the relative magnitude of torque at each joint remained constant. CONCLUSION: Our results support the idea that the control of leg swing during gait is simplified in two ways: (1) the pattern of dynamic torque at each lower limb joint is produced by appropriately scaling a single motor command and (2) the magnitude of dynamic torque at all three joints can be specified with knowledge of the magnitude of torque at a single joint. Walking speed could therefore be altered by modifying a single value related to the magnitude of torque at one joint. BioMed Central 2007-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC1866234/ /pubmed/17466065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-10 Text en Copyright © 2007 Shemmell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Shemmell, Jonathan
Johansson, Jennifer
Portra, Vanessa
Gottlieb, Gerald L
Thomas, James S
Corcos, Daniel M
Control of interjoint coordination during the swing phase of normal gait at different speeds
title Control of interjoint coordination during the swing phase of normal gait at different speeds
title_full Control of interjoint coordination during the swing phase of normal gait at different speeds
title_fullStr Control of interjoint coordination during the swing phase of normal gait at different speeds
title_full_unstemmed Control of interjoint coordination during the swing phase of normal gait at different speeds
title_short Control of interjoint coordination during the swing phase of normal gait at different speeds
title_sort control of interjoint coordination during the swing phase of normal gait at different speeds
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17466065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-10
work_keys_str_mv AT shemmelljonathan controlofinterjointcoordinationduringtheswingphaseofnormalgaitatdifferentspeeds
AT johanssonjennifer controlofinterjointcoordinationduringtheswingphaseofnormalgaitatdifferentspeeds
AT portravanessa controlofinterjointcoordinationduringtheswingphaseofnormalgaitatdifferentspeeds
AT gottliebgeraldl controlofinterjointcoordinationduringtheswingphaseofnormalgaitatdifferentspeeds
AT thomasjamess controlofinterjointcoordinationduringtheswingphaseofnormalgaitatdifferentspeeds
AT corcosdanielm controlofinterjointcoordinationduringtheswingphaseofnormalgaitatdifferentspeeds