Cargando…

Genetic analyses of longitudinal phenotype data: a comparison of univariate methods and a multivariate approach

BACKGROUND: We explored three approaches to heritability and linkage analyses of longitudinal total cholesterol levels (CHOL) in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated data without knowing the answers. The first two were univariate approaches and used 1) baseline measure at exam one or 2) summar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Qiong, Chazaro, Irmarie, Cui, Jing, Guo, Chao-Yu, Demissie, Serkalem, Larson, Martin, Atwood, Larry D, Cupples, L Adrienne, DeStefano, Anita L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14975097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S29
_version_ 1782133275329822720
author Yang, Qiong
Chazaro, Irmarie
Cui, Jing
Guo, Chao-Yu
Demissie, Serkalem
Larson, Martin
Atwood, Larry D
Cupples, L Adrienne
DeStefano, Anita L
author_facet Yang, Qiong
Chazaro, Irmarie
Cui, Jing
Guo, Chao-Yu
Demissie, Serkalem
Larson, Martin
Atwood, Larry D
Cupples, L Adrienne
DeStefano, Anita L
author_sort Yang, Qiong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We explored three approaches to heritability and linkage analyses of longitudinal total cholesterol levels (CHOL) in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated data without knowing the answers. The first two were univariate approaches and used 1) baseline measure at exam one or 2) summary measures such as mean and slope from multiple exams. The third method was a multivariate approach that directly models multiple measurements on a subject. A variance components model (SOLAR) was employed in the univariate approaches. A mixed regression model with polynomials was employed in the multivariate approach and implemented in SAS/IML. RESULTS: Using the baseline measure at exam 1, we detected all baseline or slope genes contributing a substantial amount (0.08) of variance (LOD > 3). Compared to the baseline measure, the mean measures yielded slightly higher LOD at the slope genes, and a lower LOD at the baseline genes. The slope measure produced a somewhat lower LOD for the slope gene than did the mean measure. Descriptive information on the pattern of changes in gene effects with age was estimated for three linked loci by the third approach. CONCLUSION: We found simple univariate methods may be effective to detect genes affecting longitudinal phenotypes but may not fully reveal temporal trends in gene effects. The relative efficiency of the univariate methods to detect genes depends heavily on the underlying model. Compared with the univariate approaches, the multivariate approach provided more information on temporal trends in gene effects at the cost of more complicated modelling and more intense computations.
format Text
id pubmed-1866464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18664642007-05-11 Genetic analyses of longitudinal phenotype data: a comparison of univariate methods and a multivariate approach Yang, Qiong Chazaro, Irmarie Cui, Jing Guo, Chao-Yu Demissie, Serkalem Larson, Martin Atwood, Larry D Cupples, L Adrienne DeStefano, Anita L BMC Genet Proceedings BACKGROUND: We explored three approaches to heritability and linkage analyses of longitudinal total cholesterol levels (CHOL) in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated data without knowing the answers. The first two were univariate approaches and used 1) baseline measure at exam one or 2) summary measures such as mean and slope from multiple exams. The third method was a multivariate approach that directly models multiple measurements on a subject. A variance components model (SOLAR) was employed in the univariate approaches. A mixed regression model with polynomials was employed in the multivariate approach and implemented in SAS/IML. RESULTS: Using the baseline measure at exam 1, we detected all baseline or slope genes contributing a substantial amount (0.08) of variance (LOD > 3). Compared to the baseline measure, the mean measures yielded slightly higher LOD at the slope genes, and a lower LOD at the baseline genes. The slope measure produced a somewhat lower LOD for the slope gene than did the mean measure. Descriptive information on the pattern of changes in gene effects with age was estimated for three linked loci by the third approach. CONCLUSION: We found simple univariate methods may be effective to detect genes affecting longitudinal phenotypes but may not fully reveal temporal trends in gene effects. The relative efficiency of the univariate methods to detect genes depends heavily on the underlying model. Compared with the univariate approaches, the multivariate approach provided more information on temporal trends in gene effects at the cost of more complicated modelling and more intense computations. BioMed Central 2003-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1866464/ /pubmed/14975097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S29 Text en Copyright © 2003 Yang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Yang, Qiong
Chazaro, Irmarie
Cui, Jing
Guo, Chao-Yu
Demissie, Serkalem
Larson, Martin
Atwood, Larry D
Cupples, L Adrienne
DeStefano, Anita L
Genetic analyses of longitudinal phenotype data: a comparison of univariate methods and a multivariate approach
title Genetic analyses of longitudinal phenotype data: a comparison of univariate methods and a multivariate approach
title_full Genetic analyses of longitudinal phenotype data: a comparison of univariate methods and a multivariate approach
title_fullStr Genetic analyses of longitudinal phenotype data: a comparison of univariate methods and a multivariate approach
title_full_unstemmed Genetic analyses of longitudinal phenotype data: a comparison of univariate methods and a multivariate approach
title_short Genetic analyses of longitudinal phenotype data: a comparison of univariate methods and a multivariate approach
title_sort genetic analyses of longitudinal phenotype data: a comparison of univariate methods and a multivariate approach
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14975097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S29
work_keys_str_mv AT yangqiong geneticanalysesoflongitudinalphenotypedataacomparisonofunivariatemethodsandamultivariateapproach
AT chazaroirmarie geneticanalysesoflongitudinalphenotypedataacomparisonofunivariatemethodsandamultivariateapproach
AT cuijing geneticanalysesoflongitudinalphenotypedataacomparisonofunivariatemethodsandamultivariateapproach
AT guochaoyu geneticanalysesoflongitudinalphenotypedataacomparisonofunivariatemethodsandamultivariateapproach
AT demissieserkalem geneticanalysesoflongitudinalphenotypedataacomparisonofunivariatemethodsandamultivariateapproach
AT larsonmartin geneticanalysesoflongitudinalphenotypedataacomparisonofunivariatemethodsandamultivariateapproach
AT atwoodlarryd geneticanalysesoflongitudinalphenotypedataacomparisonofunivariatemethodsandamultivariateapproach
AT cupplesladrienne geneticanalysesoflongitudinalphenotypedataacomparisonofunivariatemethodsandamultivariateapproach
AT destefanoanital geneticanalysesoflongitudinalphenotypedataacomparisonofunivariatemethodsandamultivariateapproach