Cargando…

Comparison of significance level at the true location using two linkage approaches: LODPAL and GENEFINDER

BACKGROUND: We compare two new software packages for linkage analysis, LODPAL and GENEFINDER. Both allow for covariate adjustment. Replicates 1 to 3 of Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated data sets were used for the analyses. We described the results of searching for evidence of loci contributing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Fang-Chi, Hetmanski, Jacqueline B, Li, Lan, Markakis, Diane, Jacobs, Kevin, Shugart, Yin Yao
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14975114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S46
_version_ 1782133280332578816
author Hsu, Fang-Chi
Hetmanski, Jacqueline B
Li, Lan
Markakis, Diane
Jacobs, Kevin
Shugart, Yin Yao
author_facet Hsu, Fang-Chi
Hetmanski, Jacqueline B
Li, Lan
Markakis, Diane
Jacobs, Kevin
Shugart, Yin Yao
author_sort Hsu, Fang-Chi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We compare two new software packages for linkage analysis, LODPAL and GENEFINDER. Both allow for covariate adjustment. Replicates 1 to 3 of Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated data sets were used for the analyses. We described the results of searching for evidence of loci contributing to a simulated quantitative trait related to systolic blood pressure (SBP). Individuals with SBP greater than 130 mm Hg were defined as affected individuals, and all others as unaffected. Total cholesterol was treated as a covariate. RESULTS: Using LODPAL, the power of detecting one of the three major genes related to SBP is 44.4% when a LOD score of 1 is used as the cut-off point. The power of GENEFINDER is lower than that of LODPAL. It is 22.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the limited comparison, LODPAL provided the more reasonable power to detect linkage compared to GENEFINDER. After adjusting for the total cholesterol covariate, the current version of both programs appeared to give a high number of false positives.
format Text
id pubmed-1866482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18664822007-05-11 Comparison of significance level at the true location using two linkage approaches: LODPAL and GENEFINDER Hsu, Fang-Chi Hetmanski, Jacqueline B Li, Lan Markakis, Diane Jacobs, Kevin Shugart, Yin Yao BMC Genet Proceedings BACKGROUND: We compare two new software packages for linkage analysis, LODPAL and GENEFINDER. Both allow for covariate adjustment. Replicates 1 to 3 of Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated data sets were used for the analyses. We described the results of searching for evidence of loci contributing to a simulated quantitative trait related to systolic blood pressure (SBP). Individuals with SBP greater than 130 mm Hg were defined as affected individuals, and all others as unaffected. Total cholesterol was treated as a covariate. RESULTS: Using LODPAL, the power of detecting one of the three major genes related to SBP is 44.4% when a LOD score of 1 is used as the cut-off point. The power of GENEFINDER is lower than that of LODPAL. It is 22.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the limited comparison, LODPAL provided the more reasonable power to detect linkage compared to GENEFINDER. After adjusting for the total cholesterol covariate, the current version of both programs appeared to give a high number of false positives. BioMed Central 2003-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1866482/ /pubmed/14975114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S46 Text en Copyright © 2003 Hsu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Hsu, Fang-Chi
Hetmanski, Jacqueline B
Li, Lan
Markakis, Diane
Jacobs, Kevin
Shugart, Yin Yao
Comparison of significance level at the true location using two linkage approaches: LODPAL and GENEFINDER
title Comparison of significance level at the true location using two linkage approaches: LODPAL and GENEFINDER
title_full Comparison of significance level at the true location using two linkage approaches: LODPAL and GENEFINDER
title_fullStr Comparison of significance level at the true location using two linkage approaches: LODPAL and GENEFINDER
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of significance level at the true location using two linkage approaches: LODPAL and GENEFINDER
title_short Comparison of significance level at the true location using two linkage approaches: LODPAL and GENEFINDER
title_sort comparison of significance level at the true location using two linkage approaches: lodpal and genefinder
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14975114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S46
work_keys_str_mv AT hsufangchi comparisonofsignificancelevelatthetruelocationusingtwolinkageapproacheslodpalandgenefinder
AT hetmanskijacquelineb comparisonofsignificancelevelatthetruelocationusingtwolinkageapproacheslodpalandgenefinder
AT lilan comparisonofsignificancelevelatthetruelocationusingtwolinkageapproacheslodpalandgenefinder
AT markakisdiane comparisonofsignificancelevelatthetruelocationusingtwolinkageapproacheslodpalandgenefinder
AT jacobskevin comparisonofsignificancelevelatthetruelocationusingtwolinkageapproacheslodpalandgenefinder
AT shugartyinyao comparisonofsignificancelevelatthetruelocationusingtwolinkageapproacheslodpalandgenefinder