Cargando…

Differentiating between Near- and Non-Cognate Codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

BACKGROUND: Decoding of mRNAs is performed by aminoacyl tRNAs (aa-tRNAs). This process is highly accurate, however, at low frequencies (10(−3) – 10(−4)) the wrong aa-tRNA can be selected, leading to incorporation of aberrant amino acids. Although our understanding of what constitutes the correct or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plant, Ewan P., Nguyen, Phuc, Russ, Jonathan R., Pittman, Yvette R., Nguyen, Thai, Quesinberry, Jack T., Kinzy, Terri Goss, Dinman, Jonathan D.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1885216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17565370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000517
_version_ 1782133608106950656
author Plant, Ewan P.
Nguyen, Phuc
Russ, Jonathan R.
Pittman, Yvette R.
Nguyen, Thai
Quesinberry, Jack T.
Kinzy, Terri Goss
Dinman, Jonathan D.
author_facet Plant, Ewan P.
Nguyen, Phuc
Russ, Jonathan R.
Pittman, Yvette R.
Nguyen, Thai
Quesinberry, Jack T.
Kinzy, Terri Goss
Dinman, Jonathan D.
author_sort Plant, Ewan P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Decoding of mRNAs is performed by aminoacyl tRNAs (aa-tRNAs). This process is highly accurate, however, at low frequencies (10(−3) – 10(−4)) the wrong aa-tRNA can be selected, leading to incorporation of aberrant amino acids. Although our understanding of what constitutes the correct or cognate aa-tRNA:mRNA interaction is well defined, a functional distinction between near-cognate or single mismatched, and unpaired or non-cognate interactions is lacking. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Misreading of several synonymous codon substitutions at the catalytic site of firefly luciferase was assayed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Analysis of the results in the context of current kinetic and biophysical models of aa-tRNA selection suggests that the defining feature of near-cognate aa-tRNAs is their potential to form mini-helical structures with A-site codons, enabling stimulation of GTPase activity of eukaryotic Elongation Factor 1A (eEF1A). Paromomycin specifically stimulated misreading of near-cognate but not of non-cognate aa-tRNAs, providing a functional probe to distinguish between these two classes. Deletion of the accessory elongation factor eEF1Bγ promoted increased misreading of near-cognate, but hyperaccurate reading of non-cognate codons, suggesting that this factor also has a role in tRNA discrimination. A mutant of eEF1Bα, the nucleotide exchange factor for eEF1A, promoted a general increase in fidelity, suggesting that the decreased rates of elongation may provide more time for discrimination between aa-tRNAs. A mutant form of ribosomal protein L5 promoted hyperaccurate decoding of both types of codons, even though it is topologically distant from the decoding center. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNFICANCE: It is important to distinguish between near-cognate and non-cognate mRNA:tRNA interactions, because such a definition may be important for informing therapeutic strategies for suppressing these two different categories of mutations underlying many human diseases. This study suggests that the defining feature of near-cognate aa-tRNAs is their potential to form mini-helical structures with A-site codons in the ribosomal decoding center. An aminoglycoside and a ribosomal factor can be used to distinguish between near-cognate and non-cognate interactions.
format Text
id pubmed-1885216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18852162007-06-13 Differentiating between Near- and Non-Cognate Codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Plant, Ewan P. Nguyen, Phuc Russ, Jonathan R. Pittman, Yvette R. Nguyen, Thai Quesinberry, Jack T. Kinzy, Terri Goss Dinman, Jonathan D. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Decoding of mRNAs is performed by aminoacyl tRNAs (aa-tRNAs). This process is highly accurate, however, at low frequencies (10(−3) – 10(−4)) the wrong aa-tRNA can be selected, leading to incorporation of aberrant amino acids. Although our understanding of what constitutes the correct or cognate aa-tRNA:mRNA interaction is well defined, a functional distinction between near-cognate or single mismatched, and unpaired or non-cognate interactions is lacking. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Misreading of several synonymous codon substitutions at the catalytic site of firefly luciferase was assayed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Analysis of the results in the context of current kinetic and biophysical models of aa-tRNA selection suggests that the defining feature of near-cognate aa-tRNAs is their potential to form mini-helical structures with A-site codons, enabling stimulation of GTPase activity of eukaryotic Elongation Factor 1A (eEF1A). Paromomycin specifically stimulated misreading of near-cognate but not of non-cognate aa-tRNAs, providing a functional probe to distinguish between these two classes. Deletion of the accessory elongation factor eEF1Bγ promoted increased misreading of near-cognate, but hyperaccurate reading of non-cognate codons, suggesting that this factor also has a role in tRNA discrimination. A mutant of eEF1Bα, the nucleotide exchange factor for eEF1A, promoted a general increase in fidelity, suggesting that the decreased rates of elongation may provide more time for discrimination between aa-tRNAs. A mutant form of ribosomal protein L5 promoted hyperaccurate decoding of both types of codons, even though it is topologically distant from the decoding center. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNFICANCE: It is important to distinguish between near-cognate and non-cognate mRNA:tRNA interactions, because such a definition may be important for informing therapeutic strategies for suppressing these two different categories of mutations underlying many human diseases. This study suggests that the defining feature of near-cognate aa-tRNAs is their potential to form mini-helical structures with A-site codons in the ribosomal decoding center. An aminoglycoside and a ribosomal factor can be used to distinguish between near-cognate and non-cognate interactions. Public Library of Science 2007-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC1885216/ /pubmed/17565370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000517 Text en This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Plant, Ewan P.
Nguyen, Phuc
Russ, Jonathan R.
Pittman, Yvette R.
Nguyen, Thai
Quesinberry, Jack T.
Kinzy, Terri Goss
Dinman, Jonathan D.
Differentiating between Near- and Non-Cognate Codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title Differentiating between Near- and Non-Cognate Codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_full Differentiating between Near- and Non-Cognate Codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_fullStr Differentiating between Near- and Non-Cognate Codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_full_unstemmed Differentiating between Near- and Non-Cognate Codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_short Differentiating between Near- and Non-Cognate Codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_sort differentiating between near- and non-cognate codons in saccharomyces cerevisiae
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1885216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17565370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000517
work_keys_str_mv AT plantewanp differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT nguyenphuc differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT russjonathanr differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT pittmanyvetter differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT nguyenthai differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT quesinberryjackt differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT kinzyterrigoss differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT dinmanjonathand differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae