Cargando…

Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint

In gene targeting experiments, the importance of genetic background is now widely appreciated, and knockout alleles are routinely backcrossed onto a standard inbred background. This produces a congenic strain with a substantial segment of embryonic stem (ES)-cell-derived chromosome still flanking th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schalkwyk, L C, Fernandes, C, Nash, M W, Kurrikoff, K, Vasar, E, Kõks, S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1890814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17331107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2007.00304.x
_version_ 1782133723986132992
author Schalkwyk, L C
Fernandes, C
Nash, M W
Kurrikoff, K
Vasar, E
Kõks, S
author_facet Schalkwyk, L C
Fernandes, C
Nash, M W
Kurrikoff, K
Vasar, E
Kõks, S
author_sort Schalkwyk, L C
collection PubMed
description In gene targeting experiments, the importance of genetic background is now widely appreciated, and knockout alleles are routinely backcrossed onto a standard inbred background. This produces a congenic strain with a substantial segment of embryonic stem (ES)-cell-derived chromosome still flanking the knockout allele, a phenomenon often neglected in knockout studies. In cholecystokynin 2 (Cckbr) knockout mice backcrossed with C57BL/6, we have found a clear ‘congenic footprint’ of expression differences in at least 10 genes across 40 Mb sequence flanking the Cckbr locus, each of which is potentially responsible for aspects of the ‘knockout’ phenotype. The expression differences are overwhelmingly in the knockout-low direction, which may point to a general phenomenon of background dependence. This finding emphasizes the need for caution in using gene knockouts to attribute phenotypic effects to genes. This is especially the case when the gene is of unknown function or the phenotype is unexpected, and is a particular concern for large-scale knockout and phenotypic screening programmes. However, the impact of genetic background should not be simply viewed as a potential confound, but as a unique opportunity to study the broader responses of a system to a specific (genetic) perturbation.
format Text
id pubmed-1890814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18908142007-06-18 Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint Schalkwyk, L C Fernandes, C Nash, M W Kurrikoff, K Vasar, E Kõks, S Genes Brain Behav Short Communication In gene targeting experiments, the importance of genetic background is now widely appreciated, and knockout alleles are routinely backcrossed onto a standard inbred background. This produces a congenic strain with a substantial segment of embryonic stem (ES)-cell-derived chromosome still flanking the knockout allele, a phenomenon often neglected in knockout studies. In cholecystokynin 2 (Cckbr) knockout mice backcrossed with C57BL/6, we have found a clear ‘congenic footprint’ of expression differences in at least 10 genes across 40 Mb sequence flanking the Cckbr locus, each of which is potentially responsible for aspects of the ‘knockout’ phenotype. The expression differences are overwhelmingly in the knockout-low direction, which may point to a general phenomenon of background dependence. This finding emphasizes the need for caution in using gene knockouts to attribute phenotypic effects to genes. This is especially the case when the gene is of unknown function or the phenotype is unexpected, and is a particular concern for large-scale knockout and phenotypic screening programmes. However, the impact of genetic background should not be simply viewed as a potential confound, but as a unique opportunity to study the broader responses of a system to a specific (genetic) perturbation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1890814/ /pubmed/17331107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2007.00304.x Text en © 2007 The Authors Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
spellingShingle Short Communication
Schalkwyk, L C
Fernandes, C
Nash, M W
Kurrikoff, K
Vasar, E
Kõks, S
Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint
title Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint
title_full Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint
title_fullStr Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint
title_full_unstemmed Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint
title_short Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint
title_sort interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1890814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17331107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2007.00304.x
work_keys_str_mv AT schalkwyklc interpretationofknockoutexperimentsthecongenicfootprint
AT fernandesc interpretationofknockoutexperimentsthecongenicfootprint
AT nashmw interpretationofknockoutexperimentsthecongenicfootprint
AT kurrikoffk interpretationofknockoutexperimentsthecongenicfootprint
AT vasare interpretationofknockoutexperimentsthecongenicfootprint
AT kokss interpretationofknockoutexperimentsthecongenicfootprint