Cargando…
Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint
In gene targeting experiments, the importance of genetic background is now widely appreciated, and knockout alleles are routinely backcrossed onto a standard inbred background. This produces a congenic strain with a substantial segment of embryonic stem (ES)-cell-derived chromosome still flanking th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1890814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17331107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2007.00304.x |
_version_ | 1782133723986132992 |
---|---|
author | Schalkwyk, L C Fernandes, C Nash, M W Kurrikoff, K Vasar, E Kõks, S |
author_facet | Schalkwyk, L C Fernandes, C Nash, M W Kurrikoff, K Vasar, E Kõks, S |
author_sort | Schalkwyk, L C |
collection | PubMed |
description | In gene targeting experiments, the importance of genetic background is now widely appreciated, and knockout alleles are routinely backcrossed onto a standard inbred background. This produces a congenic strain with a substantial segment of embryonic stem (ES)-cell-derived chromosome still flanking the knockout allele, a phenomenon often neglected in knockout studies. In cholecystokynin 2 (Cckbr) knockout mice backcrossed with C57BL/6, we have found a clear ‘congenic footprint’ of expression differences in at least 10 genes across 40 Mb sequence flanking the Cckbr locus, each of which is potentially responsible for aspects of the ‘knockout’ phenotype. The expression differences are overwhelmingly in the knockout-low direction, which may point to a general phenomenon of background dependence. This finding emphasizes the need for caution in using gene knockouts to attribute phenotypic effects to genes. This is especially the case when the gene is of unknown function or the phenotype is unexpected, and is a particular concern for large-scale knockout and phenotypic screening programmes. However, the impact of genetic background should not be simply viewed as a potential confound, but as a unique opportunity to study the broader responses of a system to a specific (genetic) perturbation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1890814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18908142007-06-18 Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint Schalkwyk, L C Fernandes, C Nash, M W Kurrikoff, K Vasar, E Kõks, S Genes Brain Behav Short Communication In gene targeting experiments, the importance of genetic background is now widely appreciated, and knockout alleles are routinely backcrossed onto a standard inbred background. This produces a congenic strain with a substantial segment of embryonic stem (ES)-cell-derived chromosome still flanking the knockout allele, a phenomenon often neglected in knockout studies. In cholecystokynin 2 (Cckbr) knockout mice backcrossed with C57BL/6, we have found a clear ‘congenic footprint’ of expression differences in at least 10 genes across 40 Mb sequence flanking the Cckbr locus, each of which is potentially responsible for aspects of the ‘knockout’ phenotype. The expression differences are overwhelmingly in the knockout-low direction, which may point to a general phenomenon of background dependence. This finding emphasizes the need for caution in using gene knockouts to attribute phenotypic effects to genes. This is especially the case when the gene is of unknown function or the phenotype is unexpected, and is a particular concern for large-scale knockout and phenotypic screening programmes. However, the impact of genetic background should not be simply viewed as a potential confound, but as a unique opportunity to study the broader responses of a system to a specific (genetic) perturbation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1890814/ /pubmed/17331107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2007.00304.x Text en © 2007 The Authors Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Schalkwyk, L C Fernandes, C Nash, M W Kurrikoff, K Vasar, E Kõks, S Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint |
title | Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint |
title_full | Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint |
title_fullStr | Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint |
title_full_unstemmed | Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint |
title_short | Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint |
title_sort | interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1890814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17331107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2007.00304.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schalkwyklc interpretationofknockoutexperimentsthecongenicfootprint AT fernandesc interpretationofknockoutexperimentsthecongenicfootprint AT nashmw interpretationofknockoutexperimentsthecongenicfootprint AT kurrikoffk interpretationofknockoutexperimentsthecongenicfootprint AT vasare interpretationofknockoutexperimentsthecongenicfootprint AT kokss interpretationofknockoutexperimentsthecongenicfootprint |