Cargando…

Children’s Feedback Preferences in Response to an Experimentally Manipulated Peer Evaluation Outcome: The Role of Depressive Symptoms

The present study examined the linkage between pre-adolescent children’s depressive symptoms and their preferences for receiving positive vs. negative feedback subsequent to being faced with an experimentally manipulated peer evaluation outcome in real time. Participants (n = 142) ages 10 to 13, pla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reijntjes, Albert, Dekovic, Maja, Vermande, Marjolijn, Telch, Michael J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1915605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17279340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9105-8
_version_ 1782134146091450368
author Reijntjes, Albert
Dekovic, Maja
Vermande, Marjolijn
Telch, Michael J.
author_facet Reijntjes, Albert
Dekovic, Maja
Vermande, Marjolijn
Telch, Michael J.
author_sort Reijntjes, Albert
collection PubMed
description The present study examined the linkage between pre-adolescent children’s depressive symptoms and their preferences for receiving positive vs. negative feedback subsequent to being faced with an experimentally manipulated peer evaluation outcome in real time. Participants (n = 142) ages 10 to 13, played a computer contest based on the television show Survivor and were randomized to either a peer rejection (i.e., receiving the lowest total ‘likeability’ score from a group of peer-judges), a peer success (i.e., receiving the highest score), or a control peer evaluation condition. Children’s self-reported feedback preferences were then assessed. Results revealed that participants assigned to the negative evaluation outcome, relative to either the success or the control outcome, showed a significantly higher subsequent preference for negatively tuned feedback. Contrary to previous work and predictions derived from self-verification theory, children higher in depressive symptoms were only more likely to prefer negative feedback in response to the negative peer evaluation outcome. These effects for depression were not accounted for by either state mood at baseline or mood change in response to the feedback manipulation.
format Text
id pubmed-1915605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19156052007-07-13 Children’s Feedback Preferences in Response to an Experimentally Manipulated Peer Evaluation Outcome: The Role of Depressive Symptoms Reijntjes, Albert Dekovic, Maja Vermande, Marjolijn Telch, Michael J. J Abnorm Child Psychol Original Paper The present study examined the linkage between pre-adolescent children’s depressive symptoms and their preferences for receiving positive vs. negative feedback subsequent to being faced with an experimentally manipulated peer evaluation outcome in real time. Participants (n = 142) ages 10 to 13, played a computer contest based on the television show Survivor and were randomized to either a peer rejection (i.e., receiving the lowest total ‘likeability’ score from a group of peer-judges), a peer success (i.e., receiving the highest score), or a control peer evaluation condition. Children’s self-reported feedback preferences were then assessed. Results revealed that participants assigned to the negative evaluation outcome, relative to either the success or the control outcome, showed a significantly higher subsequent preference for negatively tuned feedback. Contrary to previous work and predictions derived from self-verification theory, children higher in depressive symptoms were only more likely to prefer negative feedback in response to the negative peer evaluation outcome. These effects for depression were not accounted for by either state mood at baseline or mood change in response to the feedback manipulation. Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers 2007-02-06 2007-06 /pmc/articles/PMC1915605/ /pubmed/17279340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9105-8 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007
spellingShingle Original Paper
Reijntjes, Albert
Dekovic, Maja
Vermande, Marjolijn
Telch, Michael J.
Children’s Feedback Preferences in Response to an Experimentally Manipulated Peer Evaluation Outcome: The Role of Depressive Symptoms
title Children’s Feedback Preferences in Response to an Experimentally Manipulated Peer Evaluation Outcome: The Role of Depressive Symptoms
title_full Children’s Feedback Preferences in Response to an Experimentally Manipulated Peer Evaluation Outcome: The Role of Depressive Symptoms
title_fullStr Children’s Feedback Preferences in Response to an Experimentally Manipulated Peer Evaluation Outcome: The Role of Depressive Symptoms
title_full_unstemmed Children’s Feedback Preferences in Response to an Experimentally Manipulated Peer Evaluation Outcome: The Role of Depressive Symptoms
title_short Children’s Feedback Preferences in Response to an Experimentally Manipulated Peer Evaluation Outcome: The Role of Depressive Symptoms
title_sort children’s feedback preferences in response to an experimentally manipulated peer evaluation outcome: the role of depressive symptoms
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1915605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17279340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9105-8
work_keys_str_mv AT reijntjesalbert childrensfeedbackpreferencesinresponsetoanexperimentallymanipulatedpeerevaluationoutcometheroleofdepressivesymptoms
AT dekovicmaja childrensfeedbackpreferencesinresponsetoanexperimentallymanipulatedpeerevaluationoutcometheroleofdepressivesymptoms
AT vermandemarjolijn childrensfeedbackpreferencesinresponsetoanexperimentallymanipulatedpeerevaluationoutcometheroleofdepressivesymptoms
AT telchmichaelj childrensfeedbackpreferencesinresponsetoanexperimentallymanipulatedpeerevaluationoutcometheroleofdepressivesymptoms