Cargando…

Cost-utility analysis of genetic screening in families of patients with germline MUTYH mutations

BACKGROUND: MUTYH associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive inherited disorder. Carriers of bi-allelic MUTYH germline mutations have a risk of approximately 60% to develop colorectal carcinoma (CRC). In the general population about 1.5% is a heterozygous MUTYH mutation carrier. Children o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Maartje, Hes, Frederik J, Vasen, Hans FA, van den Hout, Wilbert B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1941726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17605803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-8-42
_version_ 1782134464106725376
author Nielsen, Maartje
Hes, Frederik J
Vasen, Hans FA
van den Hout, Wilbert B
author_facet Nielsen, Maartje
Hes, Frederik J
Vasen, Hans FA
van den Hout, Wilbert B
author_sort Nielsen, Maartje
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: MUTYH associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive inherited disorder. Carriers of bi-allelic MUTYH germline mutations have a risk of approximately 60% to develop colorectal carcinoma (CRC). In the general population about 1.5% is a heterozygous MUTYH mutation carrier. Children of MAP patients have an increased risk of inheriting two MUTYH mutations compared to the general population, implicating an increased risk for developing CRC. METHODS: Using data from the literature and Dutch MAP patients (n = 40), we constructed a Markov model to perform a societal cost-utility analysis of genetic screening in MAP families. Genetic screening was done by testing the spouse first and, in case of a heterozygous spouse, also testing of the children. RESULTS: The cost of genetic screening of families of MAP patients, when compared to no genetic screening, was estimated at €25,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The presence of Fecal Occult Blood testing (FOBT) population screening only slightly increased this cost-utility ratio to €25,500 per QALY. For a MUTYH heterozygote index-patient, the ratio was €51,500 per QALY. The results of our analysis were sensitive to several of the parameters in the model, including the cost assumed for molecular genetic testing. CONCLUSION: The costs per QALY of genetic screening in families of MAP patients are acceptable according to international standards. Therefore, genetic testing of spouses and/or children should be discussed with and offered to counselees.
format Text
id pubmed-1941726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19417262007-08-09 Cost-utility analysis of genetic screening in families of patients with germline MUTYH mutations Nielsen, Maartje Hes, Frederik J Vasen, Hans FA van den Hout, Wilbert B BMC Med Genet Research Article BACKGROUND: MUTYH associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive inherited disorder. Carriers of bi-allelic MUTYH germline mutations have a risk of approximately 60% to develop colorectal carcinoma (CRC). In the general population about 1.5% is a heterozygous MUTYH mutation carrier. Children of MAP patients have an increased risk of inheriting two MUTYH mutations compared to the general population, implicating an increased risk for developing CRC. METHODS: Using data from the literature and Dutch MAP patients (n = 40), we constructed a Markov model to perform a societal cost-utility analysis of genetic screening in MAP families. Genetic screening was done by testing the spouse first and, in case of a heterozygous spouse, also testing of the children. RESULTS: The cost of genetic screening of families of MAP patients, when compared to no genetic screening, was estimated at €25,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The presence of Fecal Occult Blood testing (FOBT) population screening only slightly increased this cost-utility ratio to €25,500 per QALY. For a MUTYH heterozygote index-patient, the ratio was €51,500 per QALY. The results of our analysis were sensitive to several of the parameters in the model, including the cost assumed for molecular genetic testing. CONCLUSION: The costs per QALY of genetic screening in families of MAP patients are acceptable according to international standards. Therefore, genetic testing of spouses and/or children should be discussed with and offered to counselees. BioMed Central 2007-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC1941726/ /pubmed/17605803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-8-42 Text en Copyright © 2007 Nielsen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nielsen, Maartje
Hes, Frederik J
Vasen, Hans FA
van den Hout, Wilbert B
Cost-utility analysis of genetic screening in families of patients with germline MUTYH mutations
title Cost-utility analysis of genetic screening in families of patients with germline MUTYH mutations
title_full Cost-utility analysis of genetic screening in families of patients with germline MUTYH mutations
title_fullStr Cost-utility analysis of genetic screening in families of patients with germline MUTYH mutations
title_full_unstemmed Cost-utility analysis of genetic screening in families of patients with germline MUTYH mutations
title_short Cost-utility analysis of genetic screening in families of patients with germline MUTYH mutations
title_sort cost-utility analysis of genetic screening in families of patients with germline mutyh mutations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1941726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17605803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-8-42
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsenmaartje costutilityanalysisofgeneticscreeninginfamiliesofpatientswithgermlinemutyhmutations
AT hesfrederikj costutilityanalysisofgeneticscreeninginfamiliesofpatientswithgermlinemutyhmutations
AT vasenhansfa costutilityanalysisofgeneticscreeninginfamiliesofpatientswithgermlinemutyhmutations
AT vandenhoutwilbertb costutilityanalysisofgeneticscreeninginfamiliesofpatientswithgermlinemutyhmutations