Cargando…

Effect of Cellular Quiescence on the Success of Targeted CML Therapy

BACKGROUND: Similar to tissue stem cells, primitive tumor cells in chronic myelogenous leukemia have been observed to undergo quiescence; that is, the cells can temporarily stop dividing. Using mathematical models, we investigate the effect of cellular quiescence on the outcome of therapy with targe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Komarova, Natalia L., Wodarz, Dominik
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1991595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17912367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000990
_version_ 1782135443214565376
author Komarova, Natalia L.
Wodarz, Dominik
author_facet Komarova, Natalia L.
Wodarz, Dominik
author_sort Komarova, Natalia L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Similar to tissue stem cells, primitive tumor cells in chronic myelogenous leukemia have been observed to undergo quiescence; that is, the cells can temporarily stop dividing. Using mathematical models, we investigate the effect of cellular quiescence on the outcome of therapy with targeted small molecule inhibitors. METHODS AND RESULTS: According to the models, the initiation of treatment can result in different patterns of tumor cell decline: a biphasic decline, a one-phase decline, and a reverse biphasic decline. A biphasic decline involves a fast initial phase (which roughly corresponds to the eradication of cycling cells by the drug), followed by a second and slower phase of exponential decline (corresponding to awakening and death of quiescent cells), which helps explain clinical data. We define the time when the switch to the second phase occurs, and identify parameters that determine whether therapy can drive the tumor extinct in a reasonable period of time or not. We further ask how cellular quiescence affects the evolution of drug resistance. We find that it has no effect on the probability that resistant mutants exist before therapy if treatment occurs with a single drug, but that quiescence increases the probability of having resistant mutants if patients are treated with a combination of two or more drugs with different targets. Interestingly, while quiescence prolongs the time until therapy reduces the number of cells to low levels or extinction, the therapy phase is irrelevant for the evolution of drug resistant mutants. If treatment fails as a result of resistance, the mutants will have evolved during the tumor growth phase, before the start of therapy. Thus, prevention of resistance is not promoted by reducing the quiescent cell population during therapy (e.g., by a combination of cell activation and drug-mediated killing). CONCLUSIONS: The mathematical models provide insights into the effect of quiescence on the basic kinetics of the response to targeted treatment of CML. They identify determinants of success in the absence of drug resistant mutants, and elucidate how quiescence influences the emergence of drug resistant mutants.
format Text
id pubmed-1991595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19915952007-10-03 Effect of Cellular Quiescence on the Success of Targeted CML Therapy Komarova, Natalia L. Wodarz, Dominik PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Similar to tissue stem cells, primitive tumor cells in chronic myelogenous leukemia have been observed to undergo quiescence; that is, the cells can temporarily stop dividing. Using mathematical models, we investigate the effect of cellular quiescence on the outcome of therapy with targeted small molecule inhibitors. METHODS AND RESULTS: According to the models, the initiation of treatment can result in different patterns of tumor cell decline: a biphasic decline, a one-phase decline, and a reverse biphasic decline. A biphasic decline involves a fast initial phase (which roughly corresponds to the eradication of cycling cells by the drug), followed by a second and slower phase of exponential decline (corresponding to awakening and death of quiescent cells), which helps explain clinical data. We define the time when the switch to the second phase occurs, and identify parameters that determine whether therapy can drive the tumor extinct in a reasonable period of time or not. We further ask how cellular quiescence affects the evolution of drug resistance. We find that it has no effect on the probability that resistant mutants exist before therapy if treatment occurs with a single drug, but that quiescence increases the probability of having resistant mutants if patients are treated with a combination of two or more drugs with different targets. Interestingly, while quiescence prolongs the time until therapy reduces the number of cells to low levels or extinction, the therapy phase is irrelevant for the evolution of drug resistant mutants. If treatment fails as a result of resistance, the mutants will have evolved during the tumor growth phase, before the start of therapy. Thus, prevention of resistance is not promoted by reducing the quiescent cell population during therapy (e.g., by a combination of cell activation and drug-mediated killing). CONCLUSIONS: The mathematical models provide insights into the effect of quiescence on the basic kinetics of the response to targeted treatment of CML. They identify determinants of success in the absence of drug resistant mutants, and elucidate how quiescence influences the emergence of drug resistant mutants. Public Library of Science 2007-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1991595/ /pubmed/17912367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000990 Text en Komarova, Wodarz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Komarova, Natalia L.
Wodarz, Dominik
Effect of Cellular Quiescence on the Success of Targeted CML Therapy
title Effect of Cellular Quiescence on the Success of Targeted CML Therapy
title_full Effect of Cellular Quiescence on the Success of Targeted CML Therapy
title_fullStr Effect of Cellular Quiescence on the Success of Targeted CML Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Cellular Quiescence on the Success of Targeted CML Therapy
title_short Effect of Cellular Quiescence on the Success of Targeted CML Therapy
title_sort effect of cellular quiescence on the success of targeted cml therapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1991595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17912367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000990
work_keys_str_mv AT komarovanatalial effectofcellularquiescenceonthesuccessoftargetedcmltherapy
AT wodarzdominik effectofcellularquiescenceonthesuccessoftargetedcmltherapy