Cargando…

Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances

BACKGROUND: Laser microdissection microscopy has become a rising tool to assess gene expression profiles of pure cell populations. Given the low yield of RNA, a second round of amplification is usually mandatory to yield sufficient amplified-RNA for microarray approaches. Since amplification induces...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boelens, Mirjam C, te Meerman, Gerard J, Gibcus, Johan H, Blokzijl, Tjasso, Boezen, H Marike, Timens, Wim, Postma, Dirkje S, Groen, Harry JM, van den Berg, Anke
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2000903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17697374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-277
_version_ 1782135558171000832
author Boelens, Mirjam C
te Meerman, Gerard J
Gibcus, Johan H
Blokzijl, Tjasso
Boezen, H Marike
Timens, Wim
Postma, Dirkje S
Groen, Harry JM
van den Berg, Anke
author_facet Boelens, Mirjam C
te Meerman, Gerard J
Gibcus, Johan H
Blokzijl, Tjasso
Boezen, H Marike
Timens, Wim
Postma, Dirkje S
Groen, Harry JM
van den Berg, Anke
author_sort Boelens, Mirjam C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laser microdissection microscopy has become a rising tool to assess gene expression profiles of pure cell populations. Given the low yield of RNA, a second round of amplification is usually mandatory to yield sufficient amplified-RNA for microarray approaches. Since amplification induces truncation of RNA molecules, we studied the impact of a second round of amplification on identification of differentially expressed genes in relation to the probe – poly(A)-tail distances. RESULTS: Disagreement was observed between gene expression profiles acquired after a second round of amplification compared to a single round. Thirty percent of the differentially expressed genes identified after one round of amplification were not detected after two rounds. These inconsistent genes have a significant longer probe – poly(A)-tail distance. qRT-PCR on unamplified RNA confirmed differential expression of genes with a probe – poly(A)-tail distance >500 nucleotides appearing only after one round of amplification. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate a marked loss of 30% of truly differentially expressed genes after a second round of amplification. Therefore, we strongly recommend improvement of amplification procedures and importance of microarray probe design to allow detection of all differentially expressed genes in case of limited amounts of RNA.
format Text
id pubmed-2000903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20009032007-10-05 Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances Boelens, Mirjam C te Meerman, Gerard J Gibcus, Johan H Blokzijl, Tjasso Boezen, H Marike Timens, Wim Postma, Dirkje S Groen, Harry JM van den Berg, Anke BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Laser microdissection microscopy has become a rising tool to assess gene expression profiles of pure cell populations. Given the low yield of RNA, a second round of amplification is usually mandatory to yield sufficient amplified-RNA for microarray approaches. Since amplification induces truncation of RNA molecules, we studied the impact of a second round of amplification on identification of differentially expressed genes in relation to the probe – poly(A)-tail distances. RESULTS: Disagreement was observed between gene expression profiles acquired after a second round of amplification compared to a single round. Thirty percent of the differentially expressed genes identified after one round of amplification were not detected after two rounds. These inconsistent genes have a significant longer probe – poly(A)-tail distance. qRT-PCR on unamplified RNA confirmed differential expression of genes with a probe – poly(A)-tail distance >500 nucleotides appearing only after one round of amplification. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate a marked loss of 30% of truly differentially expressed genes after a second round of amplification. Therefore, we strongly recommend improvement of amplification procedures and importance of microarray probe design to allow detection of all differentially expressed genes in case of limited amounts of RNA. BioMed Central 2007-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2000903/ /pubmed/17697374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-277 Text en Copyright © 2007 Boelens et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boelens, Mirjam C
te Meerman, Gerard J
Gibcus, Johan H
Blokzijl, Tjasso
Boezen, H Marike
Timens, Wim
Postma, Dirkje S
Groen, Harry JM
van den Berg, Anke
Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances
title Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances
title_full Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances
title_fullStr Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances
title_full_unstemmed Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances
title_short Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances
title_sort microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(a)-tail distances
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2000903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17697374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-277
work_keys_str_mv AT boelensmirjamc microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances
AT temeermangerardj microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances
AT gibcusjohanh microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances
AT blokzijltjasso microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances
AT boezenhmarike microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances
AT timenswim microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances
AT postmadirkjes microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances
AT groenharryjm microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances
AT vandenberganke microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances