Cargando…
Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances
BACKGROUND: Laser microdissection microscopy has become a rising tool to assess gene expression profiles of pure cell populations. Given the low yield of RNA, a second round of amplification is usually mandatory to yield sufficient amplified-RNA for microarray approaches. Since amplification induces...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2000903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17697374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-277 |
_version_ | 1782135558171000832 |
---|---|
author | Boelens, Mirjam C te Meerman, Gerard J Gibcus, Johan H Blokzijl, Tjasso Boezen, H Marike Timens, Wim Postma, Dirkje S Groen, Harry JM van den Berg, Anke |
author_facet | Boelens, Mirjam C te Meerman, Gerard J Gibcus, Johan H Blokzijl, Tjasso Boezen, H Marike Timens, Wim Postma, Dirkje S Groen, Harry JM van den Berg, Anke |
author_sort | Boelens, Mirjam C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Laser microdissection microscopy has become a rising tool to assess gene expression profiles of pure cell populations. Given the low yield of RNA, a second round of amplification is usually mandatory to yield sufficient amplified-RNA for microarray approaches. Since amplification induces truncation of RNA molecules, we studied the impact of a second round of amplification on identification of differentially expressed genes in relation to the probe – poly(A)-tail distances. RESULTS: Disagreement was observed between gene expression profiles acquired after a second round of amplification compared to a single round. Thirty percent of the differentially expressed genes identified after one round of amplification were not detected after two rounds. These inconsistent genes have a significant longer probe – poly(A)-tail distance. qRT-PCR on unamplified RNA confirmed differential expression of genes with a probe – poly(A)-tail distance >500 nucleotides appearing only after one round of amplification. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate a marked loss of 30% of truly differentially expressed genes after a second round of amplification. Therefore, we strongly recommend improvement of amplification procedures and importance of microarray probe design to allow detection of all differentially expressed genes in case of limited amounts of RNA. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2000903 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-20009032007-10-05 Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances Boelens, Mirjam C te Meerman, Gerard J Gibcus, Johan H Blokzijl, Tjasso Boezen, H Marike Timens, Wim Postma, Dirkje S Groen, Harry JM van den Berg, Anke BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Laser microdissection microscopy has become a rising tool to assess gene expression profiles of pure cell populations. Given the low yield of RNA, a second round of amplification is usually mandatory to yield sufficient amplified-RNA for microarray approaches. Since amplification induces truncation of RNA molecules, we studied the impact of a second round of amplification on identification of differentially expressed genes in relation to the probe – poly(A)-tail distances. RESULTS: Disagreement was observed between gene expression profiles acquired after a second round of amplification compared to a single round. Thirty percent of the differentially expressed genes identified after one round of amplification were not detected after two rounds. These inconsistent genes have a significant longer probe – poly(A)-tail distance. qRT-PCR on unamplified RNA confirmed differential expression of genes with a probe – poly(A)-tail distance >500 nucleotides appearing only after one round of amplification. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate a marked loss of 30% of truly differentially expressed genes after a second round of amplification. Therefore, we strongly recommend improvement of amplification procedures and importance of microarray probe design to allow detection of all differentially expressed genes in case of limited amounts of RNA. BioMed Central 2007-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2000903/ /pubmed/17697374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-277 Text en Copyright © 2007 Boelens et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Boelens, Mirjam C te Meerman, Gerard J Gibcus, Johan H Blokzijl, Tjasso Boezen, H Marike Timens, Wim Postma, Dirkje S Groen, Harry JM van den Berg, Anke Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances |
title | Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances |
title_full | Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances |
title_fullStr | Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances |
title_full_unstemmed | Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances |
title_short | Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(A)-tail distances |
title_sort | microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe – poly(a)-tail distances |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2000903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17697374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-277 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boelensmirjamc microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances AT temeermangerardj microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances AT gibcusjohanh microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances AT blokzijltjasso microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances AT boezenhmarike microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances AT timenswim microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances AT postmadirkjes microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances AT groenharryjm microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances AT vandenberganke microarrayamplificationbiaslossof30differentiallyexpressedgenesduetolongprobepolyataildistances |