Cargando…
A Prospective Study of Red and Processed Meat Intake in Relation to Cancer Risk
BACKGROUND: Red meat and processed meat have been associated with carcinogenesis at several anatomic sites, but no prospective study has examined meat intake in relation to a range of malignancies. We investigated whether red or processed meat intake increases cancer risk at a variety of sites. METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2121107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18076279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040325 |
_version_ | 1782141651258441728 |
---|---|
author | Cross, Amanda J Leitzmann, Michael F Gail, Mitchell H Hollenbeck, Albert R Schatzkin, Arthur Sinha, Rashmi |
author_facet | Cross, Amanda J Leitzmann, Michael F Gail, Mitchell H Hollenbeck, Albert R Schatzkin, Arthur Sinha, Rashmi |
author_sort | Cross, Amanda J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Red meat and processed meat have been associated with carcinogenesis at several anatomic sites, but no prospective study has examined meat intake in relation to a range of malignancies. We investigated whether red or processed meat intake increases cancer risk at a variety of sites. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The National Institutes of Health (NIH)-AARP (formerly the American Association for Retired Persons) Diet and Health Study is a cohort of approximately 500,000 people aged 50–71 y at baseline (1995–1996). Meat intake was estimated from a food frequency questionnaire administered at baseline. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals within quintiles of red and processed meat intake. During up to 8.2 y of follow-up, 53,396 incident cancers were ascertained. Statistically significant elevated risks (ranging from 20% to 60%) were evident for esophageal, colorectal, liver, and lung cancer, comparing individuals in the highest with those in the lowest quintile of red meat intake. Furthermore, individuals in the highest quintile of processed meat intake had a 20% elevated risk for colorectal and a 16% elevated risk for lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Both red and processed meat intakes were positively associated with cancers of the colorectum and lung; furthermore, red meat intake was associated with an elevated risk for cancers of the esophagus and liver. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2121107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-21211072007-12-11 A Prospective Study of Red and Processed Meat Intake in Relation to Cancer Risk Cross, Amanda J Leitzmann, Michael F Gail, Mitchell H Hollenbeck, Albert R Schatzkin, Arthur Sinha, Rashmi PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Red meat and processed meat have been associated with carcinogenesis at several anatomic sites, but no prospective study has examined meat intake in relation to a range of malignancies. We investigated whether red or processed meat intake increases cancer risk at a variety of sites. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The National Institutes of Health (NIH)-AARP (formerly the American Association for Retired Persons) Diet and Health Study is a cohort of approximately 500,000 people aged 50–71 y at baseline (1995–1996). Meat intake was estimated from a food frequency questionnaire administered at baseline. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals within quintiles of red and processed meat intake. During up to 8.2 y of follow-up, 53,396 incident cancers were ascertained. Statistically significant elevated risks (ranging from 20% to 60%) were evident for esophageal, colorectal, liver, and lung cancer, comparing individuals in the highest with those in the lowest quintile of red meat intake. Furthermore, individuals in the highest quintile of processed meat intake had a 20% elevated risk for colorectal and a 16% elevated risk for lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Both red and processed meat intakes were positively associated with cancers of the colorectum and lung; furthermore, red meat intake was associated with an elevated risk for cancers of the esophagus and liver. Public Library of Science 2007-12 2007-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2121107/ /pubmed/18076279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040325 Text en © 2007 Cross et al. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cross, Amanda J Leitzmann, Michael F Gail, Mitchell H Hollenbeck, Albert R Schatzkin, Arthur Sinha, Rashmi A Prospective Study of Red and Processed Meat Intake in Relation to Cancer Risk |
title | A Prospective Study of Red and Processed Meat Intake in Relation to Cancer Risk |
title_full | A Prospective Study of Red and Processed Meat Intake in Relation to Cancer Risk |
title_fullStr | A Prospective Study of Red and Processed Meat Intake in Relation to Cancer Risk |
title_full_unstemmed | A Prospective Study of Red and Processed Meat Intake in Relation to Cancer Risk |
title_short | A Prospective Study of Red and Processed Meat Intake in Relation to Cancer Risk |
title_sort | prospective study of red and processed meat intake in relation to cancer risk |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2121107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18076279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040325 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crossamandaj aprospectivestudyofredandprocessedmeatintakeinrelationtocancerrisk AT leitzmannmichaelf aprospectivestudyofredandprocessedmeatintakeinrelationtocancerrisk AT gailmitchellh aprospectivestudyofredandprocessedmeatintakeinrelationtocancerrisk AT hollenbeckalbertr aprospectivestudyofredandprocessedmeatintakeinrelationtocancerrisk AT schatzkinarthur aprospectivestudyofredandprocessedmeatintakeinrelationtocancerrisk AT sinharashmi aprospectivestudyofredandprocessedmeatintakeinrelationtocancerrisk AT crossamandaj prospectivestudyofredandprocessedmeatintakeinrelationtocancerrisk AT leitzmannmichaelf prospectivestudyofredandprocessedmeatintakeinrelationtocancerrisk AT gailmitchellh prospectivestudyofredandprocessedmeatintakeinrelationtocancerrisk AT hollenbeckalbertr prospectivestudyofredandprocessedmeatintakeinrelationtocancerrisk AT schatzkinarthur prospectivestudyofredandprocessedmeatintakeinrelationtocancerrisk AT sinharashmi prospectivestudyofredandprocessedmeatintakeinrelationtocancerrisk |