Cargando…

Membrane Stretch Slows the Concerted Step prior to Opening in a Kv Channel

In the simplest model of channel mechanosensitivity, expanded states are favored by stretch. We showed previously that stretch accelerates voltage-dependent activation and slow inactivation in a Kv channel, but whether these transitions involve expansions is unknown. Thus, while voltage-gated channe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laitko, Ulrike, Juranka, Peter F., Morris, Catherine E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2151533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16735754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200509394
_version_ 1782144736288571392
author Laitko, Ulrike
Juranka, Peter F.
Morris, Catherine E.
author_facet Laitko, Ulrike
Juranka, Peter F.
Morris, Catherine E.
author_sort Laitko, Ulrike
collection PubMed
description In the simplest model of channel mechanosensitivity, expanded states are favored by stretch. We showed previously that stretch accelerates voltage-dependent activation and slow inactivation in a Kv channel, but whether these transitions involve expansions is unknown. Thus, while voltage-gated channels are mechanosensitive, it is not clear whether the simplest model applies. For Kv pore opening steps, however, there is excellent evidence for concerted expansion motions. To ask how these motions respond to stretch, therefore, we have used a Kv1 mutant, Shaker ILT, in which the step immediately prior to opening is rate limiting for voltage-dependent current. Macroscopic currents were measured in oocyte patches before, during, and after stretch. Invariably, and directly counter to prediction for expansion-derived free energy, ILT current activation (which is limited by the concerted step prior to pore opening) slowed with stretch and the g(V) curve reversibly right shifted. In WTIR (wild type, inactivation removed), the g(V) (which reflects independent voltage sensor motions) is left shifted. Stretch-induced slowing of ILT activation was fully accounted for by a decreased basic forward rate, with no change of gating charge. We suggest that for the highly cooperative motions of ILT activation, stretch-induced disordering of the lipid channel interface may yield an entropy increase that dominates over any stretch facilitation of expanded states. Since tail current τ(V) reports on the opposite (closing) motions, ILT and WTIR τ(V)(tail) were determined, but the stretch responses were too complex to shed much light. Shaw is the Kv3 whose voltage sensor, introduced into Shaker, forms the chimera that ILT mimics. Since Shaw2 F335A activation was reportedly a first-order concerted transition, we thought its activation might, like ILT's, slow with stretch. However, Shaw2 F335A activation proved to be sigmoid shaped, so its rate-limiting transition was not a concerted pore-opening transition. Moreover, stretch, via an unidentified non–rate-limiting transition, augmented steady-state current in Shaw2 F335A. Since putative area expansion and compaction during ILT pore opening and closing were not the energetically consequential determinants of stretch modulation, models incorporating fine details of bilayer structural forces will probably be needed to explain how, for Kv channels, bilayer stretch slows some transitions while accelerating others.
format Text
id pubmed-2151533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21515332008-01-17 Membrane Stretch Slows the Concerted Step prior to Opening in a Kv Channel Laitko, Ulrike Juranka, Peter F. Morris, Catherine E. J Gen Physiol Articles In the simplest model of channel mechanosensitivity, expanded states are favored by stretch. We showed previously that stretch accelerates voltage-dependent activation and slow inactivation in a Kv channel, but whether these transitions involve expansions is unknown. Thus, while voltage-gated channels are mechanosensitive, it is not clear whether the simplest model applies. For Kv pore opening steps, however, there is excellent evidence for concerted expansion motions. To ask how these motions respond to stretch, therefore, we have used a Kv1 mutant, Shaker ILT, in which the step immediately prior to opening is rate limiting for voltage-dependent current. Macroscopic currents were measured in oocyte patches before, during, and after stretch. Invariably, and directly counter to prediction for expansion-derived free energy, ILT current activation (which is limited by the concerted step prior to pore opening) slowed with stretch and the g(V) curve reversibly right shifted. In WTIR (wild type, inactivation removed), the g(V) (which reflects independent voltage sensor motions) is left shifted. Stretch-induced slowing of ILT activation was fully accounted for by a decreased basic forward rate, with no change of gating charge. We suggest that for the highly cooperative motions of ILT activation, stretch-induced disordering of the lipid channel interface may yield an entropy increase that dominates over any stretch facilitation of expanded states. Since tail current τ(V) reports on the opposite (closing) motions, ILT and WTIR τ(V)(tail) were determined, but the stretch responses were too complex to shed much light. Shaw is the Kv3 whose voltage sensor, introduced into Shaker, forms the chimera that ILT mimics. Since Shaw2 F335A activation was reportedly a first-order concerted transition, we thought its activation might, like ILT's, slow with stretch. However, Shaw2 F335A activation proved to be sigmoid shaped, so its rate-limiting transition was not a concerted pore-opening transition. Moreover, stretch, via an unidentified non–rate-limiting transition, augmented steady-state current in Shaw2 F335A. Since putative area expansion and compaction during ILT pore opening and closing were not the energetically consequential determinants of stretch modulation, models incorporating fine details of bilayer structural forces will probably be needed to explain how, for Kv channels, bilayer stretch slows some transitions while accelerating others. The Rockefeller University Press 2006-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2151533/ /pubmed/16735754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200509394 Text en Copyright © 2006, The Rockefeller University Press This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Laitko, Ulrike
Juranka, Peter F.
Morris, Catherine E.
Membrane Stretch Slows the Concerted Step prior to Opening in a Kv Channel
title Membrane Stretch Slows the Concerted Step prior to Opening in a Kv Channel
title_full Membrane Stretch Slows the Concerted Step prior to Opening in a Kv Channel
title_fullStr Membrane Stretch Slows the Concerted Step prior to Opening in a Kv Channel
title_full_unstemmed Membrane Stretch Slows the Concerted Step prior to Opening in a Kv Channel
title_short Membrane Stretch Slows the Concerted Step prior to Opening in a Kv Channel
title_sort membrane stretch slows the concerted step prior to opening in a kv channel
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2151533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16735754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200509394
work_keys_str_mv AT laitkoulrike membranestretchslowstheconcertedsteppriortoopeninginakvchannel
AT jurankapeterf membranestretchslowstheconcertedsteppriortoopeninginakvchannel
AT morriscatherinee membranestretchslowstheconcertedsteppriortoopeninginakvchannel