Cargando…
Preventing DNA over-replication: a Cdk perspective
The cell cycle is tightly controlled to ensure that replication origins fire only once per cycle and that consecutive S-phases are separated by mitosis. When controls fail, DNA over-replication ensues: individual origins fire more than once per S-phase (re-replication) or consecutive S-phases occur...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2245919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18211690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-1028-3-3 |
_version_ | 1782150684988145664 |
---|---|
author | Porter, Andrew CG |
author_facet | Porter, Andrew CG |
author_sort | Porter, Andrew CG |
collection | PubMed |
description | The cell cycle is tightly controlled to ensure that replication origins fire only once per cycle and that consecutive S-phases are separated by mitosis. When controls fail, DNA over-replication ensues: individual origins fire more than once per S-phase (re-replication) or consecutive S-phases occur without intervening mitoses (endoreduplication). In yeast the cell cycle is controlled by a single cyclin dependent kinase (Cdk) that prevents origin licensing at times when it promotes origin firing, and that is inactivated, via proteolysis of its partner cyclin, as cells undergo mitosis. A quantitative model describes three levels of Cdk activity: low activity allows licensing, intermediate activity allows firing but prevents licensing, and high activity promotes mitosis. In higher eukaryotes the situation is complicated by the existence of additional proteins (geminin, Cul4-Ddb1(Cdt2), and Emi1) that control licensing. A current challenge is to understand how these various control mechanisms are co-ordinated and why the degree of redundancy between them is so variable. Here the experimental induction of DNA over-replication is reviewed in the context of the quantitative model of Cdk action. Endoreduplication is viewed as a consequence of procedures that cause Cdk activity to fall below the threshold required to prevent licensing, and re-replication as the result of procedures that increase that threshold value. This may help to explain why over-replication does not necessarily require reduced Cdk activity and how different mechanisms conspire to prevent over-replication. Further work is nevertheless required to determine exactly how losing just one licensing control mechanism often causes over-replication, and why this varies between cell systems. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2245919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22459192008-02-16 Preventing DNA over-replication: a Cdk perspective Porter, Andrew CG Cell Div Review The cell cycle is tightly controlled to ensure that replication origins fire only once per cycle and that consecutive S-phases are separated by mitosis. When controls fail, DNA over-replication ensues: individual origins fire more than once per S-phase (re-replication) or consecutive S-phases occur without intervening mitoses (endoreduplication). In yeast the cell cycle is controlled by a single cyclin dependent kinase (Cdk) that prevents origin licensing at times when it promotes origin firing, and that is inactivated, via proteolysis of its partner cyclin, as cells undergo mitosis. A quantitative model describes three levels of Cdk activity: low activity allows licensing, intermediate activity allows firing but prevents licensing, and high activity promotes mitosis. In higher eukaryotes the situation is complicated by the existence of additional proteins (geminin, Cul4-Ddb1(Cdt2), and Emi1) that control licensing. A current challenge is to understand how these various control mechanisms are co-ordinated and why the degree of redundancy between them is so variable. Here the experimental induction of DNA over-replication is reviewed in the context of the quantitative model of Cdk action. Endoreduplication is viewed as a consequence of procedures that cause Cdk activity to fall below the threshold required to prevent licensing, and re-replication as the result of procedures that increase that threshold value. This may help to explain why over-replication does not necessarily require reduced Cdk activity and how different mechanisms conspire to prevent over-replication. Further work is nevertheless required to determine exactly how losing just one licensing control mechanism often causes over-replication, and why this varies between cell systems. BioMed Central 2008-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2245919/ /pubmed/18211690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-1028-3-3 Text en Copyright © 2008 Porter; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Porter, Andrew CG Preventing DNA over-replication: a Cdk perspective |
title | Preventing DNA over-replication: a Cdk perspective |
title_full | Preventing DNA over-replication: a Cdk perspective |
title_fullStr | Preventing DNA over-replication: a Cdk perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Preventing DNA over-replication: a Cdk perspective |
title_short | Preventing DNA over-replication: a Cdk perspective |
title_sort | preventing dna over-replication: a cdk perspective |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2245919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18211690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-1028-3-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT porterandrewcg preventingdnaoverreplicationacdkperspective |