Cargando…

Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts

Comparative mutagenesis of 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine (εA) and 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), two endogenous DNA lesions that are also formed by exogenous DNA damaging agents, have been evaluated in HeLa and xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XPV) cell extracts. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of the duplex M13mp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tolentino, Joel H., Burke, Tom J., Mukhopadhyay, Suparna, McGregor, W. Glenn, Basu, Ashis K.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2275085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18184697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm1157
_version_ 1782151813233901568
author Tolentino, Joel H.
Burke, Tom J.
Mukhopadhyay, Suparna
McGregor, W. Glenn
Basu, Ashis K.
author_facet Tolentino, Joel H.
Burke, Tom J.
Mukhopadhyay, Suparna
McGregor, W. Glenn
Basu, Ashis K.
author_sort Tolentino, Joel H.
collection PubMed
description Comparative mutagenesis of 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine (εA) and 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), two endogenous DNA lesions that are also formed by exogenous DNA damaging agents, have been evaluated in HeLa and xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XPV) cell extracts. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of the duplex M13mp2SV vector containing these lesions established that there was significant inhibition of replication fork movement past εA, whereas 8-oxoG caused only minor stalling of fork progression. In extracts of HeLa cells, εA was weakly mutagenic inducing all three base substitutions in approximately equal frequency, whereas 8-oxoG was 10-fold more mutagenic inducing primarily G→T transversions. These data suggest that 8-oxoG is a miscoding lesion that presents a minimal, if any, block to DNA replication in human cells. We hypothesized that bypass of εA proceeded principally by an error-free mechanism in which the undamaged strand was used as a template, since this lesion strongly blocked fork progression. To examine this, we determined the sequence of replication products derived from templates in which a G was placed across from the εA. Consistent with our hypothesis, 93% of the progeny were derived from replication of the undamaged strand. When translesion synthesis occurred, εA→T mutations increased 3-fold in products derived from the mismatched εA: G construct compared with those derived from the εA: T construct. More efficient repair of εA in the εA: T construct may have been responsible for lower mutation frequency. Primer extension studies with purified pol η have shown that this polymerase is highly error-prone when bypassing εA. To examine if pol η is the primary mutagenic translesion polymerase in human cells, we determined the lesion bypass characteristics of extracts derived from XPV cells, which lack this polymerase. The εA: T construct induced εA→G and εA→C mutant frequencies that were approximately the same as those observed using the HeLa extracts. However, εA→T events were increased 5-fold relative to HeLa extracts. These data support a model in which pol η-mediated translesion synthesis past this adduct is error-free in the context of semiconservative replication in the presence of fidelity factors such as PCNA.
format Text
id pubmed-2275085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22750852008-04-07 Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts Tolentino, Joel H. Burke, Tom J. Mukhopadhyay, Suparna McGregor, W. Glenn Basu, Ashis K. Nucleic Acids Res Molecular Biology Comparative mutagenesis of 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine (εA) and 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), two endogenous DNA lesions that are also formed by exogenous DNA damaging agents, have been evaluated in HeLa and xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XPV) cell extracts. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of the duplex M13mp2SV vector containing these lesions established that there was significant inhibition of replication fork movement past εA, whereas 8-oxoG caused only minor stalling of fork progression. In extracts of HeLa cells, εA was weakly mutagenic inducing all three base substitutions in approximately equal frequency, whereas 8-oxoG was 10-fold more mutagenic inducing primarily G→T transversions. These data suggest that 8-oxoG is a miscoding lesion that presents a minimal, if any, block to DNA replication in human cells. We hypothesized that bypass of εA proceeded principally by an error-free mechanism in which the undamaged strand was used as a template, since this lesion strongly blocked fork progression. To examine this, we determined the sequence of replication products derived from templates in which a G was placed across from the εA. Consistent with our hypothesis, 93% of the progeny were derived from replication of the undamaged strand. When translesion synthesis occurred, εA→T mutations increased 3-fold in products derived from the mismatched εA: G construct compared with those derived from the εA: T construct. More efficient repair of εA in the εA: T construct may have been responsible for lower mutation frequency. Primer extension studies with purified pol η have shown that this polymerase is highly error-prone when bypassing εA. To examine if pol η is the primary mutagenic translesion polymerase in human cells, we determined the lesion bypass characteristics of extracts derived from XPV cells, which lack this polymerase. The εA: T construct induced εA→G and εA→C mutant frequencies that were approximately the same as those observed using the HeLa extracts. However, εA→T events were increased 5-fold relative to HeLa extracts. These data support a model in which pol η-mediated translesion synthesis past this adduct is error-free in the context of semiconservative replication in the presence of fidelity factors such as PCNA. Oxford University Press 2008-03 2008-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2275085/ /pubmed/18184697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm1157 Text en © 2008 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Molecular Biology
Tolentino, Joel H.
Burke, Tom J.
Mukhopadhyay, Suparna
McGregor, W. Glenn
Basu, Ashis K.
Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts
title Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts
title_full Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts
title_fullStr Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts
title_full_unstemmed Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts
title_short Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts
title_sort inhibition of dna replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, n(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts
topic Molecular Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2275085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18184697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm1157
work_keys_str_mv AT tolentinojoelh inhibitionofdnareplicationforkprogressionandmutagenicpotentialof1n6ethenoadenineand8oxoguanineinhumancellextracts
AT burketomj inhibitionofdnareplicationforkprogressionandmutagenicpotentialof1n6ethenoadenineand8oxoguanineinhumancellextracts
AT mukhopadhyaysuparna inhibitionofdnareplicationforkprogressionandmutagenicpotentialof1n6ethenoadenineand8oxoguanineinhumancellextracts
AT mcgregorwglenn inhibitionofdnareplicationforkprogressionandmutagenicpotentialof1n6ethenoadenineand8oxoguanineinhumancellextracts
AT basuashisk inhibitionofdnareplicationforkprogressionandmutagenicpotentialof1n6ethenoadenineand8oxoguanineinhumancellextracts