Cargando…
Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts
Comparative mutagenesis of 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine (εA) and 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), two endogenous DNA lesions that are also formed by exogenous DNA damaging agents, have been evaluated in HeLa and xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XPV) cell extracts. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of the duplex M13mp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2275085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18184697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm1157 |
_version_ | 1782151813233901568 |
---|---|
author | Tolentino, Joel H. Burke, Tom J. Mukhopadhyay, Suparna McGregor, W. Glenn Basu, Ashis K. |
author_facet | Tolentino, Joel H. Burke, Tom J. Mukhopadhyay, Suparna McGregor, W. Glenn Basu, Ashis K. |
author_sort | Tolentino, Joel H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Comparative mutagenesis of 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine (εA) and 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), two endogenous DNA lesions that are also formed by exogenous DNA damaging agents, have been evaluated in HeLa and xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XPV) cell extracts. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of the duplex M13mp2SV vector containing these lesions established that there was significant inhibition of replication fork movement past εA, whereas 8-oxoG caused only minor stalling of fork progression. In extracts of HeLa cells, εA was weakly mutagenic inducing all three base substitutions in approximately equal frequency, whereas 8-oxoG was 10-fold more mutagenic inducing primarily G→T transversions. These data suggest that 8-oxoG is a miscoding lesion that presents a minimal, if any, block to DNA replication in human cells. We hypothesized that bypass of εA proceeded principally by an error-free mechanism in which the undamaged strand was used as a template, since this lesion strongly blocked fork progression. To examine this, we determined the sequence of replication products derived from templates in which a G was placed across from the εA. Consistent with our hypothesis, 93% of the progeny were derived from replication of the undamaged strand. When translesion synthesis occurred, εA→T mutations increased 3-fold in products derived from the mismatched εA: G construct compared with those derived from the εA: T construct. More efficient repair of εA in the εA: T construct may have been responsible for lower mutation frequency. Primer extension studies with purified pol η have shown that this polymerase is highly error-prone when bypassing εA. To examine if pol η is the primary mutagenic translesion polymerase in human cells, we determined the lesion bypass characteristics of extracts derived from XPV cells, which lack this polymerase. The εA: T construct induced εA→G and εA→C mutant frequencies that were approximately the same as those observed using the HeLa extracts. However, εA→T events were increased 5-fold relative to HeLa extracts. These data support a model in which pol η-mediated translesion synthesis past this adduct is error-free in the context of semiconservative replication in the presence of fidelity factors such as PCNA. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2275085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22750852008-04-07 Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts Tolentino, Joel H. Burke, Tom J. Mukhopadhyay, Suparna McGregor, W. Glenn Basu, Ashis K. Nucleic Acids Res Molecular Biology Comparative mutagenesis of 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine (εA) and 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), two endogenous DNA lesions that are also formed by exogenous DNA damaging agents, have been evaluated in HeLa and xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XPV) cell extracts. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of the duplex M13mp2SV vector containing these lesions established that there was significant inhibition of replication fork movement past εA, whereas 8-oxoG caused only minor stalling of fork progression. In extracts of HeLa cells, εA was weakly mutagenic inducing all three base substitutions in approximately equal frequency, whereas 8-oxoG was 10-fold more mutagenic inducing primarily G→T transversions. These data suggest that 8-oxoG is a miscoding lesion that presents a minimal, if any, block to DNA replication in human cells. We hypothesized that bypass of εA proceeded principally by an error-free mechanism in which the undamaged strand was used as a template, since this lesion strongly blocked fork progression. To examine this, we determined the sequence of replication products derived from templates in which a G was placed across from the εA. Consistent with our hypothesis, 93% of the progeny were derived from replication of the undamaged strand. When translesion synthesis occurred, εA→T mutations increased 3-fold in products derived from the mismatched εA: G construct compared with those derived from the εA: T construct. More efficient repair of εA in the εA: T construct may have been responsible for lower mutation frequency. Primer extension studies with purified pol η have shown that this polymerase is highly error-prone when bypassing εA. To examine if pol η is the primary mutagenic translesion polymerase in human cells, we determined the lesion bypass characteristics of extracts derived from XPV cells, which lack this polymerase. The εA: T construct induced εA→G and εA→C mutant frequencies that were approximately the same as those observed using the HeLa extracts. However, εA→T events were increased 5-fold relative to HeLa extracts. These data support a model in which pol η-mediated translesion synthesis past this adduct is error-free in the context of semiconservative replication in the presence of fidelity factors such as PCNA. Oxford University Press 2008-03 2008-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2275085/ /pubmed/18184697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm1157 Text en © 2008 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Molecular Biology Tolentino, Joel H. Burke, Tom J. Mukhopadhyay, Suparna McGregor, W. Glenn Basu, Ashis K. Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts |
title | Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts |
title_full | Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts |
title_fullStr | Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts |
title_full_unstemmed | Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts |
title_short | Inhibition of DNA replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts |
title_sort | inhibition of dna replication fork progression and mutagenic potential of 1, n(6)-ethenoadenine and 8-oxoguanine in human cell extracts |
topic | Molecular Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2275085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18184697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm1157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tolentinojoelh inhibitionofdnareplicationforkprogressionandmutagenicpotentialof1n6ethenoadenineand8oxoguanineinhumancellextracts AT burketomj inhibitionofdnareplicationforkprogressionandmutagenicpotentialof1n6ethenoadenineand8oxoguanineinhumancellextracts AT mukhopadhyaysuparna inhibitionofdnareplicationforkprogressionandmutagenicpotentialof1n6ethenoadenineand8oxoguanineinhumancellextracts AT mcgregorwglenn inhibitionofdnareplicationforkprogressionandmutagenicpotentialof1n6ethenoadenineand8oxoguanineinhumancellextracts AT basuashisk inhibitionofdnareplicationforkprogressionandmutagenicpotentialof1n6ethenoadenineand8oxoguanineinhumancellextracts |