Cargando…

Phase III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects

Radical radiotherapy is a standard form of management of localised prostate cancer. Conformal treatment planning spares adjacent normal tissues reducing treatment-related side effects and may permit safe dose escalation. We have tested the effects on tumour control and side effects of escalating rad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dearnaley, D P, Hall, E, Lawrence, D, Huddart, R A, Eeles, R, Nutting, C M, Gadd, J, Warrington, A, Bidmead, M, Horwich, A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15685244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602301
_version_ 1782153374432493568
author Dearnaley, D P
Hall, E
Lawrence, D
Huddart, R A
Eeles, R
Nutting, C M
Gadd, J
Warrington, A
Bidmead, M
Horwich, A
author_facet Dearnaley, D P
Hall, E
Lawrence, D
Huddart, R A
Eeles, R
Nutting, C M
Gadd, J
Warrington, A
Bidmead, M
Horwich, A
author_sort Dearnaley, D P
collection PubMed
description Radical radiotherapy is a standard form of management of localised prostate cancer. Conformal treatment planning spares adjacent normal tissues reducing treatment-related side effects and may permit safe dose escalation. We have tested the effects on tumour control and side effects of escalating radiotherapy dose and investigated the appropriate target volume margin. After an initial 3–6 month period of androgen suppression, 126 men were randomised and treated with radiotherapy using a 2 by 2 factorial trial design. The initial radiotherapy tumour target volume included the prostate and base of seminal vesicles (SV) or complete SV depending on SV involvement risk. Treatments were randomised to deliver a dose of 64 Gy with either a 1.0 or 1.5 cm margin around the tumour volume (1.0 and 1.5 cm margin groups) and also to treat either with or without a 10 Gy boost to the prostate alone with no additional margin (64 and 74 Gy groups). Tumour control was monitored by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and clinical examination with additional tests as appropriate. Acute and late side effects of treatment were measured using the Radiation Treatment and Oncology Groups (RTOG) and LENT SOM systems. The results showed that freedom from PSA failure was higher in the 74 Gy group compared to the 64 Gy group, but this did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance with 5-year actuarial control rates of 71% (95% CI 58–81%) in the 74 Gy group vs 59% (95% CI 45–70%) in the 64 Gy group. There were 23 failures in the 74Gy group and 33 in the 64 Gy group (Hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.38–1.10, P=0.10). No difference in disease control was seen between the 1.0 and 1.5 cm margin groups (5-year actuarial control rates 67%, 95% CI 53–77% vs 63%, 95% CI 50–74%) with 28 events in each group (Hazard ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.50–1.86, P=0.94). Acute side effects were generally mild and 18 weeks after treatment, only four and five of the 126 men had persistent ⩾Grade 1 bowel or bladder side effects, respectively. Statistically significant increases in acute bladder side effects were seen after treatment in the men receiving 74 Gy (P=0.006), and increases in both acute bowel side effects during treatment (P=0.05) and acute bladder sequelae (P=0.002) were recorded for men in the 1.5 cm margin group. While statistically significant, these differences were of short duration and of doubtful clinical importance. Late bowel side effects (RTOG⩾2) were seen more commonly in the 74 Gy and 1.5 cm margin groups (P=0.02 and P=0.05, respectively) in the first 2 years after randomisation. Similar results were found using the LENT SOM assessments. No significant differences in late bladder side effects were seen between the randomised groups using the RTOG scoring system. Using the LENT SOM instrument, a higher proportion of men treated in the 74 Gy group had Grade ⩾3 urinary frequency at 6 and 12 months. Compared to baseline scores, bladder symptoms improved after 6 months or more follow-up in all groups. Sexual function deteriorated after treatment with the number of men reporting some sexual dysfunction (Grade⩾1) increasing from 38% at baseline to 66% at 6 months and 1 year and 81% by year 5. However, no consistent differences were seen between the randomised groups. In conclusion, dose escalation from 64 to 74 Gy using conformal radiotherapy may improve long-term PSA control, but a treatment margin of 1.5 cm is unnecessary and is associated with increased acute bowel and bladder reactions and more late rectal side effects. Data from this randomised pilot study informed the Data Monitoring Committee of the Medical Research Council RT 01 Trial and the two studies will be combined in subsequent meta-analysis.
format Text
id pubmed-2362084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23620842009-09-10 Phase III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects Dearnaley, D P Hall, E Lawrence, D Huddart, R A Eeles, R Nutting, C M Gadd, J Warrington, A Bidmead, M Horwich, A Br J Cancer Clinical Study Radical radiotherapy is a standard form of management of localised prostate cancer. Conformal treatment planning spares adjacent normal tissues reducing treatment-related side effects and may permit safe dose escalation. We have tested the effects on tumour control and side effects of escalating radiotherapy dose and investigated the appropriate target volume margin. After an initial 3–6 month period of androgen suppression, 126 men were randomised and treated with radiotherapy using a 2 by 2 factorial trial design. The initial radiotherapy tumour target volume included the prostate and base of seminal vesicles (SV) or complete SV depending on SV involvement risk. Treatments were randomised to deliver a dose of 64 Gy with either a 1.0 or 1.5 cm margin around the tumour volume (1.0 and 1.5 cm margin groups) and also to treat either with or without a 10 Gy boost to the prostate alone with no additional margin (64 and 74 Gy groups). Tumour control was monitored by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and clinical examination with additional tests as appropriate. Acute and late side effects of treatment were measured using the Radiation Treatment and Oncology Groups (RTOG) and LENT SOM systems. The results showed that freedom from PSA failure was higher in the 74 Gy group compared to the 64 Gy group, but this did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance with 5-year actuarial control rates of 71% (95% CI 58–81%) in the 74 Gy group vs 59% (95% CI 45–70%) in the 64 Gy group. There were 23 failures in the 74Gy group and 33 in the 64 Gy group (Hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.38–1.10, P=0.10). No difference in disease control was seen between the 1.0 and 1.5 cm margin groups (5-year actuarial control rates 67%, 95% CI 53–77% vs 63%, 95% CI 50–74%) with 28 events in each group (Hazard ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.50–1.86, P=0.94). Acute side effects were generally mild and 18 weeks after treatment, only four and five of the 126 men had persistent ⩾Grade 1 bowel or bladder side effects, respectively. Statistically significant increases in acute bladder side effects were seen after treatment in the men receiving 74 Gy (P=0.006), and increases in both acute bowel side effects during treatment (P=0.05) and acute bladder sequelae (P=0.002) were recorded for men in the 1.5 cm margin group. While statistically significant, these differences were of short duration and of doubtful clinical importance. Late bowel side effects (RTOG⩾2) were seen more commonly in the 74 Gy and 1.5 cm margin groups (P=0.02 and P=0.05, respectively) in the first 2 years after randomisation. Similar results were found using the LENT SOM assessments. No significant differences in late bladder side effects were seen between the randomised groups using the RTOG scoring system. Using the LENT SOM instrument, a higher proportion of men treated in the 74 Gy group had Grade ⩾3 urinary frequency at 6 and 12 months. Compared to baseline scores, bladder symptoms improved after 6 months or more follow-up in all groups. Sexual function deteriorated after treatment with the number of men reporting some sexual dysfunction (Grade⩾1) increasing from 38% at baseline to 66% at 6 months and 1 year and 81% by year 5. However, no consistent differences were seen between the randomised groups. In conclusion, dose escalation from 64 to 74 Gy using conformal radiotherapy may improve long-term PSA control, but a treatment margin of 1.5 cm is unnecessary and is associated with increased acute bowel and bladder reactions and more late rectal side effects. Data from this randomised pilot study informed the Data Monitoring Committee of the Medical Research Council RT 01 Trial and the two studies will be combined in subsequent meta-analysis. Nature Publishing Group 2005-02-14 2005-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2362084/ /pubmed/15685244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602301 Text en Copyright © 2005 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Dearnaley, D P
Hall, E
Lawrence, D
Huddart, R A
Eeles, R
Nutting, C M
Gadd, J
Warrington, A
Bidmead, M
Horwich, A
Phase III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects
title Phase III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects
title_full Phase III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects
title_fullStr Phase III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects
title_full_unstemmed Phase III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects
title_short Phase III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects
title_sort phase iii pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: psa control and side effects
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15685244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602301
work_keys_str_mv AT dearnaleydp phaseiiipilotstudyofdoseescalationusingconformalradiotherapyinprostatecancerpsacontrolandsideeffects
AT halle phaseiiipilotstudyofdoseescalationusingconformalradiotherapyinprostatecancerpsacontrolandsideeffects
AT lawrenced phaseiiipilotstudyofdoseescalationusingconformalradiotherapyinprostatecancerpsacontrolandsideeffects
AT huddartra phaseiiipilotstudyofdoseescalationusingconformalradiotherapyinprostatecancerpsacontrolandsideeffects
AT eelesr phaseiiipilotstudyofdoseescalationusingconformalradiotherapyinprostatecancerpsacontrolandsideeffects
AT nuttingcm phaseiiipilotstudyofdoseescalationusingconformalradiotherapyinprostatecancerpsacontrolandsideeffects
AT gaddj phaseiiipilotstudyofdoseescalationusingconformalradiotherapyinprostatecancerpsacontrolandsideeffects
AT warringtona phaseiiipilotstudyofdoseescalationusingconformalradiotherapyinprostatecancerpsacontrolandsideeffects
AT bidmeadm phaseiiipilotstudyofdoseescalationusingconformalradiotherapyinprostatecancerpsacontrolandsideeffects
AT horwicha phaseiiipilotstudyofdoseescalationusingconformalradiotherapyinprostatecancerpsacontrolandsideeffects