Cargando…

Food groups and colorectal cancer risk

Most studies of diet and colorectal cancer have considered nutrients and micronutrients, but the role of foods or food groups remains open to debate. To elucidate the issue, we examined data from a case–control study conducted between 1992 and 1997 in the Swiss canton of Vaud. Cases were 223 patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levi, F, Pasche, C, La Vecchia, C, Lucchini, F, Franceschi, S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10098773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690206
_version_ 1782153411763896320
author Levi, F
Pasche, C
La Vecchia, C
Lucchini, F
Franceschi, S
author_facet Levi, F
Pasche, C
La Vecchia, C
Lucchini, F
Franceschi, S
author_sort Levi, F
collection PubMed
description Most studies of diet and colorectal cancer have considered nutrients and micronutrients, but the role of foods or food groups remains open to debate. To elucidate the issue, we examined data from a case–control study conducted between 1992 and 1997 in the Swiss canton of Vaud. Cases were 223 patients (142 men, 81 women) with incident, histologically confirmed colon (n = 119) or rectal (n = 104) cancer (median age 63 years), linked with the Cancer Registry of the Swiss Canton of Vaud, and controls were 491 subjects (211 men, 280 women, median age 58 years) admitted to the same university hospital for a wide spectrum of acute non-neoplastic conditions unrelated to long-term modifications of diet. Odds ratios (OR) were obtained after allowance for age, sex, education, smoking, alcohol, body mass index, physical activity and total energy intake. Significant associations were observed for refined grain (OR = 1.32 for an increase of one serving per day), and red meat (OR = 1.54), pork and processed meat (OR = 1.27), alcohol (OR = 1.28), and significant protections for whole grain (OR = 0.85), raw (OR = 0.85) and cooked vegetables (OR = 0.69), citrus (OR = 0.86) and other fruits (OR = 0.85), and for coffee (OR = 0.73). Garlic was also protective (OR = 0.32 for the highest tertile of intake). These findings in a central European population support the hypothesis that a diet rich in refined grains and red meat increases the risk of colorectal cancer; they, therefore, support the recommendation to substitute whole grains for refined grain, to limit meat intake, and to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign
format Text
id pubmed-2362252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1999
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23622522009-09-10 Food groups and colorectal cancer risk Levi, F Pasche, C La Vecchia, C Lucchini, F Franceschi, S Br J Cancer Regular Article Most studies of diet and colorectal cancer have considered nutrients and micronutrients, but the role of foods or food groups remains open to debate. To elucidate the issue, we examined data from a case–control study conducted between 1992 and 1997 in the Swiss canton of Vaud. Cases were 223 patients (142 men, 81 women) with incident, histologically confirmed colon (n = 119) or rectal (n = 104) cancer (median age 63 years), linked with the Cancer Registry of the Swiss Canton of Vaud, and controls were 491 subjects (211 men, 280 women, median age 58 years) admitted to the same university hospital for a wide spectrum of acute non-neoplastic conditions unrelated to long-term modifications of diet. Odds ratios (OR) were obtained after allowance for age, sex, education, smoking, alcohol, body mass index, physical activity and total energy intake. Significant associations were observed for refined grain (OR = 1.32 for an increase of one serving per day), and red meat (OR = 1.54), pork and processed meat (OR = 1.27), alcohol (OR = 1.28), and significant protections for whole grain (OR = 0.85), raw (OR = 0.85) and cooked vegetables (OR = 0.69), citrus (OR = 0.86) and other fruits (OR = 0.85), and for coffee (OR = 0.73). Garlic was also protective (OR = 0.32 for the highest tertile of intake). These findings in a central European population support the hypothesis that a diet rich in refined grains and red meat increases the risk of colorectal cancer; they, therefore, support the recommendation to substitute whole grains for refined grain, to limit meat intake, and to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign Nature Publishing Group 1999-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2362252/ /pubmed/10098773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690206 Text en Copyright © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Levi, F
Pasche, C
La Vecchia, C
Lucchini, F
Franceschi, S
Food groups and colorectal cancer risk
title Food groups and colorectal cancer risk
title_full Food groups and colorectal cancer risk
title_fullStr Food groups and colorectal cancer risk
title_full_unstemmed Food groups and colorectal cancer risk
title_short Food groups and colorectal cancer risk
title_sort food groups and colorectal cancer risk
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10098773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690206
work_keys_str_mv AT levif foodgroupsandcolorectalcancerrisk
AT paschec foodgroupsandcolorectalcancerrisk
AT lavecchiac foodgroupsandcolorectalcancerrisk
AT lucchinif foodgroupsandcolorectalcancerrisk
AT franceschis foodgroupsandcolorectalcancerrisk