Cargando…
Rudra Interrupts Receptor Signaling Complexes to Negatively Regulate the IMD Pathway
Insects rely primarily on innate immune responses to fight pathogens. In Drosophila, antimicrobial peptides are key contributors to host defense. Antimicrobial peptide gene expression is regulated by the IMD and Toll pathways. Bacterial peptidoglycans trigger these pathways, through recognition by p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18688280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000120 |
_version_ | 1782158075974647808 |
---|---|
author | Aggarwal, Kamna Rus, Florentina Vriesema-Magnuson, Christie Ertürk-Hasdemir, Deniz Paquette, Nicholas Silverman, Neal |
author_facet | Aggarwal, Kamna Rus, Florentina Vriesema-Magnuson, Christie Ertürk-Hasdemir, Deniz Paquette, Nicholas Silverman, Neal |
author_sort | Aggarwal, Kamna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Insects rely primarily on innate immune responses to fight pathogens. In Drosophila, antimicrobial peptides are key contributors to host defense. Antimicrobial peptide gene expression is regulated by the IMD and Toll pathways. Bacterial peptidoglycans trigger these pathways, through recognition by peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs). DAP-type peptidoglycan triggers the IMD pathway via PGRP-LC and PGRP-LE, while lysine-type peptidoglycan is an agonist for the Toll pathway through PGRP-SA and PGRP-SD. Recent work has shown that the intensity and duration of the immune responses initiating with these receptors is tightly regulated at multiple levels, by a series of negative regulators. Through two-hybrid screening with PGRP-LC, we identified Rudra, a new regulator of the IMD pathway, and demonstrate that it is a critical feedback inhibitor of peptidoglycan receptor signaling. Following stimulation of the IMD pathway, rudra expression was rapidly induced. In cells, RNAi targeting of rudra caused a marked up-regulation of antimicrobial peptide gene expression. rudra mutant flies also hyper-activated antimicrobial peptide genes and were more resistant to infection with the insect pathogen Erwinia carotovora carotovora. Molecularly, Rudra was found to bind and interfere with both PGRP-LC and PGRP-LE, disrupting their signaling complex. These results show that Rudra is a critical component in a negative feedback loop, whereby immune-induced gene expression rapidly produces a potent inhibitor that binds and inhibits pattern recognition receptors. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2483946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24839462008-08-08 Rudra Interrupts Receptor Signaling Complexes to Negatively Regulate the IMD Pathway Aggarwal, Kamna Rus, Florentina Vriesema-Magnuson, Christie Ertürk-Hasdemir, Deniz Paquette, Nicholas Silverman, Neal PLoS Pathog Research Article Insects rely primarily on innate immune responses to fight pathogens. In Drosophila, antimicrobial peptides are key contributors to host defense. Antimicrobial peptide gene expression is regulated by the IMD and Toll pathways. Bacterial peptidoglycans trigger these pathways, through recognition by peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs). DAP-type peptidoglycan triggers the IMD pathway via PGRP-LC and PGRP-LE, while lysine-type peptidoglycan is an agonist for the Toll pathway through PGRP-SA and PGRP-SD. Recent work has shown that the intensity and duration of the immune responses initiating with these receptors is tightly regulated at multiple levels, by a series of negative regulators. Through two-hybrid screening with PGRP-LC, we identified Rudra, a new regulator of the IMD pathway, and demonstrate that it is a critical feedback inhibitor of peptidoglycan receptor signaling. Following stimulation of the IMD pathway, rudra expression was rapidly induced. In cells, RNAi targeting of rudra caused a marked up-regulation of antimicrobial peptide gene expression. rudra mutant flies also hyper-activated antimicrobial peptide genes and were more resistant to infection with the insect pathogen Erwinia carotovora carotovora. Molecularly, Rudra was found to bind and interfere with both PGRP-LC and PGRP-LE, disrupting their signaling complex. These results show that Rudra is a critical component in a negative feedback loop, whereby immune-induced gene expression rapidly produces a potent inhibitor that binds and inhibits pattern recognition receptors. Public Library of Science 2008-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2483946/ /pubmed/18688280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000120 Text en Aggarwal et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Aggarwal, Kamna Rus, Florentina Vriesema-Magnuson, Christie Ertürk-Hasdemir, Deniz Paquette, Nicholas Silverman, Neal Rudra Interrupts Receptor Signaling Complexes to Negatively Regulate the IMD Pathway |
title | Rudra Interrupts Receptor Signaling Complexes to Negatively Regulate the IMD Pathway |
title_full | Rudra Interrupts Receptor Signaling Complexes to Negatively Regulate the IMD Pathway |
title_fullStr | Rudra Interrupts Receptor Signaling Complexes to Negatively Regulate the IMD Pathway |
title_full_unstemmed | Rudra Interrupts Receptor Signaling Complexes to Negatively Regulate the IMD Pathway |
title_short | Rudra Interrupts Receptor Signaling Complexes to Negatively Regulate the IMD Pathway |
title_sort | rudra interrupts receptor signaling complexes to negatively regulate the imd pathway |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18688280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aggarwalkamna rudrainterruptsreceptorsignalingcomplexestonegativelyregulatetheimdpathway AT rusflorentina rudrainterruptsreceptorsignalingcomplexestonegativelyregulatetheimdpathway AT vriesemamagnusonchristie rudrainterruptsreceptorsignalingcomplexestonegativelyregulatetheimdpathway AT erturkhasdemirdeniz rudrainterruptsreceptorsignalingcomplexestonegativelyregulatetheimdpathway AT paquettenicholas rudrainterruptsreceptorsignalingcomplexestonegativelyregulatetheimdpathway AT silvermanneal rudrainterruptsreceptorsignalingcomplexestonegativelyregulatetheimdpathway |