Cargando…

Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study

BACKGROUND: The aim was to examine any differences in the way that Read codes are applied to the records for female patients with learning disabilities across three PCT areas. To ascertain the most commonly used read codes for learning disability. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study carri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reynolds, Fiona, Stanistreet, Debbi L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2492860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18647408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-252
_version_ 1782158201210273792
author Reynolds, Fiona
Stanistreet, Debbi L
author_facet Reynolds, Fiona
Stanistreet, Debbi L
author_sort Reynolds, Fiona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim was to examine any differences in the way that Read codes are applied to the records for female patients with learning disabilities across three PCT areas. To ascertain the most commonly used read codes for learning disability. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study carried out in Bury, Heywood-and-Middleton and Rochdale PCTs. All women in the eligible age-group (25–64) as of the 1(st )June, 2005, who were in contact with the Learning Disabilities Teams in the relevant PCT areas were identified from the Teams' lists. The appropriate Read Codes were then used to identify women on GP systems. Patient data is stored on the GP database systems (Vision, EMIS, EMIS PC4 and Torex) and it was possible to search for patients with learning disabilities. RESULTS: The use of Read Codes varies across the three areas. The most commonly used Read codes were E3 (Mental Retardation) – 27%, PJ0. (Down's Syndrome) – 14% and Eu81z (Learning Disabilities) – 8%. In 24% of the records a Read Code had not been documented. CONCLUSION: Read codes application varies between GP surgeries – dependent on PCT policy and the surgery's approach and also as a result of staff time.
format Text
id pubmed-2492860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24928602008-08-01 Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study Reynolds, Fiona Stanistreet, Debbi L BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim was to examine any differences in the way that Read codes are applied to the records for female patients with learning disabilities across three PCT areas. To ascertain the most commonly used read codes for learning disability. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study carried out in Bury, Heywood-and-Middleton and Rochdale PCTs. All women in the eligible age-group (25–64) as of the 1(st )June, 2005, who were in contact with the Learning Disabilities Teams in the relevant PCT areas were identified from the Teams' lists. The appropriate Read Codes were then used to identify women on GP systems. Patient data is stored on the GP database systems (Vision, EMIS, EMIS PC4 and Torex) and it was possible to search for patients with learning disabilities. RESULTS: The use of Read Codes varies across the three areas. The most commonly used Read codes were E3 (Mental Retardation) – 27%, PJ0. (Down's Syndrome) – 14% and Eu81z (Learning Disabilities) – 8%. In 24% of the records a Read Code had not been documented. CONCLUSION: Read codes application varies between GP surgeries – dependent on PCT policy and the surgery's approach and also as a result of staff time. BioMed Central 2008-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2492860/ /pubmed/18647408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-252 Text en Copyright © 2008 Reynolds and Stanistreet; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reynolds, Fiona
Stanistreet, Debbi L
Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study
title Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study
title_full Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study
title_fullStr Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study
title_short Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study
title_sort women with learning disabilities and read coding: lessons from a cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2492860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18647408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-252
work_keys_str_mv AT reynoldsfiona womenwithlearningdisabilitiesandreadcodinglessonsfromacohortstudy
AT stanistreetdebbil womenwithlearningdisabilitiesandreadcodinglessonsfromacohortstudy