Cargando…
Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study
BACKGROUND: The aim was to examine any differences in the way that Read codes are applied to the records for female patients with learning disabilities across three PCT areas. To ascertain the most commonly used read codes for learning disability. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study carri...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2492860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18647408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-252 |
_version_ | 1782158201210273792 |
---|---|
author | Reynolds, Fiona Stanistreet, Debbi L |
author_facet | Reynolds, Fiona Stanistreet, Debbi L |
author_sort | Reynolds, Fiona |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim was to examine any differences in the way that Read codes are applied to the records for female patients with learning disabilities across three PCT areas. To ascertain the most commonly used read codes for learning disability. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study carried out in Bury, Heywood-and-Middleton and Rochdale PCTs. All women in the eligible age-group (25–64) as of the 1(st )June, 2005, who were in contact with the Learning Disabilities Teams in the relevant PCT areas were identified from the Teams' lists. The appropriate Read Codes were then used to identify women on GP systems. Patient data is stored on the GP database systems (Vision, EMIS, EMIS PC4 and Torex) and it was possible to search for patients with learning disabilities. RESULTS: The use of Read Codes varies across the three areas. The most commonly used Read codes were E3 (Mental Retardation) – 27%, PJ0. (Down's Syndrome) – 14% and Eu81z (Learning Disabilities) – 8%. In 24% of the records a Read Code had not been documented. CONCLUSION: Read codes application varies between GP surgeries – dependent on PCT policy and the surgery's approach and also as a result of staff time. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2492860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24928602008-08-01 Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study Reynolds, Fiona Stanistreet, Debbi L BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim was to examine any differences in the way that Read codes are applied to the records for female patients with learning disabilities across three PCT areas. To ascertain the most commonly used read codes for learning disability. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study carried out in Bury, Heywood-and-Middleton and Rochdale PCTs. All women in the eligible age-group (25–64) as of the 1(st )June, 2005, who were in contact with the Learning Disabilities Teams in the relevant PCT areas were identified from the Teams' lists. The appropriate Read Codes were then used to identify women on GP systems. Patient data is stored on the GP database systems (Vision, EMIS, EMIS PC4 and Torex) and it was possible to search for patients with learning disabilities. RESULTS: The use of Read Codes varies across the three areas. The most commonly used Read codes were E3 (Mental Retardation) – 27%, PJ0. (Down's Syndrome) – 14% and Eu81z (Learning Disabilities) – 8%. In 24% of the records a Read Code had not been documented. CONCLUSION: Read codes application varies between GP surgeries – dependent on PCT policy and the surgery's approach and also as a result of staff time. BioMed Central 2008-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2492860/ /pubmed/18647408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-252 Text en Copyright © 2008 Reynolds and Stanistreet; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Reynolds, Fiona Stanistreet, Debbi L Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study |
title | Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study |
title_full | Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study |
title_fullStr | Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study |
title_short | Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: Lessons from a cohort study |
title_sort | women with learning disabilities and read coding: lessons from a cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2492860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18647408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reynoldsfiona womenwithlearningdisabilitiesandreadcodinglessonsfromacohortstudy AT stanistreetdebbil womenwithlearningdisabilitiesandreadcodinglessonsfromacohortstudy |