Cargando…

Altered Calcium Homeostasis Does Not Explain the Contractile Deficit of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVE—This study examines the extent to which the contractile deficit of diabetic cardiomyopathy is due to altered Ca(2+) homeostasis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Measurements of isometric force and intracellular calcium ([Ca(2+)](i), using fura-2/AM) were made in left ventricular (LV) trabecula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Lin, Cannell, Mark B., Phillips, Anthony R.J., Cooper, Garth J.S., Ward, Marie-Louise
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2494698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18492789
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db08-0140
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE—This study examines the extent to which the contractile deficit of diabetic cardiomyopathy is due to altered Ca(2+) homeostasis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Measurements of isometric force and intracellular calcium ([Ca(2+)](i), using fura-2/AM) were made in left ventricular (LV) trabeculae from rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes and age-matched siblings. RESULTS—At 1.5 mmol/l [Ca(2+)](o), 37°C, and 5-Hz stimulation frequency, peak stress was depressed in diabetic rats (10 ± 1 vs. 17 ± 2 mN/mm(2) in controls; P < 0.05) with a slower time to peak stress (77 ± 3 vs. 67 ± 2 ms; P < 0.01) and time to 90% relaxation (76 ± 7 vs. 56 ± 3 ms; P < 0.05). No difference was found between groups for either resting or peak Ca(2+), but the Ca(2+) transient was slower in time to peak (39 ± 2 vs. 34 ± 1 ms) and decay (time constant, 61 ± 3 vs. 49 ± 3 ms). Diabetic rats had a longer LV action potential (APD(50), 98 ± 5 vs. 62 ± 5 ms; P < 0.0001). Western blotting showed that diabetic rats had a reduced expression of sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase (SERCA)2a, with no difference in expression of the Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger. Immunohistochemistry of LV free wall showed that type I collagen was increased in diabetic rats (diabetic 7.1 ± 0.1%, control 12.7 ± 0.1%; P < 0.01), and F-actin content reduced (diabetic 56.9 ± 0.6%; control 61.7 ± 0.4%; P < 0.0001) with a disrupted structure. CONCLUSIONS—We find no evidence to support the idea that altered Ca(2+) homeostasis underlies the contractile deficit of diabetic cardiomyopathy. The slower action potential and reduced SERCA2a expression can explain the slower Ca(2+) transient kinetics in diabetic rats but not the contractile deficit. Instead, we suggest that the observed LV remodeling may play a crucial role.