Cargando…

An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution

BACKGROUND: The origin of nuclear receptors (NRs) and the question whether the ancestral NR was a liganded or an unliganded transcription factor has been recently debated. To obtain insight into the evolution of the ligand binding ability of estrogen receptors (ER), we comparatively characterized th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paris, Mathilde, Pettersson, Katarina, Schubert, Michael, Bertrand, Stephanie, Pongratz, Ingemar, Escriva, Hector, Laudet, Vincent
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2529310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18655705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-219
_version_ 1782158913954643968
author Paris, Mathilde
Pettersson, Katarina
Schubert, Michael
Bertrand, Stephanie
Pongratz, Ingemar
Escriva, Hector
Laudet, Vincent
author_facet Paris, Mathilde
Pettersson, Katarina
Schubert, Michael
Bertrand, Stephanie
Pongratz, Ingemar
Escriva, Hector
Laudet, Vincent
author_sort Paris, Mathilde
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The origin of nuclear receptors (NRs) and the question whether the ancestral NR was a liganded or an unliganded transcription factor has been recently debated. To obtain insight into the evolution of the ligand binding ability of estrogen receptors (ER), we comparatively characterized the ER from the protochordate amphioxus (Branchiostoma floridae), and the ER from lamprey (Petromyzon marinus), a basal vertebrate. RESULTS: Extensive phylogenetic studies as well as signature analysis allowed us to confirm that the amphioxus ER (amphiER) and the lamprey ER (lampER) belong to the ER group. LampER behaves as a "classical" vertebrate ER, as it binds to specific DNA Estrogen Responsive Elements (EREs), and is activated by estradiol (E(2)), the classical ER natural ligand. In contrast, we found that although amphiER binds EREs, it is unable to bind E(2 )and to activate transcription in response to E(2). Among the 7 natural and synthetic ER ligands tested as well as a large repertoire of 14 cholesterol derivatives, only Bisphenol A (an endocrine disruptor with estrogenic activity) bound to amphiER, suggesting that a ligand binding pocket exists within the receptor. Parsimony analysis considering all available ER sequences suggest that the ancestral ER was not able to bind E(2 )and that this ability evolved specifically in the vertebrate lineage. This result does not support a previous analysis based on ancestral sequence reconstruction that proposed the ancestral steroid receptor to bind estradiol. We show that biased taxonomic sampling can alter the calculation of ancestral sequence and that the previous result might stem from a high proportion of vertebrate ERs in the dataset used to compute the ancestral sequence. CONCLUSION: Taken together, our results highlight the importance of comparative experimental approaches vs ancestral reconstructions for the evolutionary study of endocrine systems: comparative analysis of extant ERs suggests that the ancestral ER did not bind estradiol and that it gained the ability to be regulated by estradiol specifically in the vertebrate lineage, before lamprey split.
format Text
id pubmed-2529310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25293102008-09-05 An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution Paris, Mathilde Pettersson, Katarina Schubert, Michael Bertrand, Stephanie Pongratz, Ingemar Escriva, Hector Laudet, Vincent BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The origin of nuclear receptors (NRs) and the question whether the ancestral NR was a liganded or an unliganded transcription factor has been recently debated. To obtain insight into the evolution of the ligand binding ability of estrogen receptors (ER), we comparatively characterized the ER from the protochordate amphioxus (Branchiostoma floridae), and the ER from lamprey (Petromyzon marinus), a basal vertebrate. RESULTS: Extensive phylogenetic studies as well as signature analysis allowed us to confirm that the amphioxus ER (amphiER) and the lamprey ER (lampER) belong to the ER group. LampER behaves as a "classical" vertebrate ER, as it binds to specific DNA Estrogen Responsive Elements (EREs), and is activated by estradiol (E(2)), the classical ER natural ligand. In contrast, we found that although amphiER binds EREs, it is unable to bind E(2 )and to activate transcription in response to E(2). Among the 7 natural and synthetic ER ligands tested as well as a large repertoire of 14 cholesterol derivatives, only Bisphenol A (an endocrine disruptor with estrogenic activity) bound to amphiER, suggesting that a ligand binding pocket exists within the receptor. Parsimony analysis considering all available ER sequences suggest that the ancestral ER was not able to bind E(2 )and that this ability evolved specifically in the vertebrate lineage. This result does not support a previous analysis based on ancestral sequence reconstruction that proposed the ancestral steroid receptor to bind estradiol. We show that biased taxonomic sampling can alter the calculation of ancestral sequence and that the previous result might stem from a high proportion of vertebrate ERs in the dataset used to compute the ancestral sequence. CONCLUSION: Taken together, our results highlight the importance of comparative experimental approaches vs ancestral reconstructions for the evolutionary study of endocrine systems: comparative analysis of extant ERs suggests that the ancestral ER did not bind estradiol and that it gained the ability to be regulated by estradiol specifically in the vertebrate lineage, before lamprey split. BioMed Central 2008-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2529310/ /pubmed/18655705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-219 Text en Copyright ©2008 Paris et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Paris, Mathilde
Pettersson, Katarina
Schubert, Michael
Bertrand, Stephanie
Pongratz, Ingemar
Escriva, Hector
Laudet, Vincent
An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution
title An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution
title_full An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution
title_fullStr An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution
title_full_unstemmed An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution
title_short An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution
title_sort amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: insights into estrogen receptor evolution
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2529310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18655705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-219
work_keys_str_mv AT parismathilde anamphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution
AT petterssonkatarina anamphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution
AT schubertmichael anamphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution
AT bertrandstephanie anamphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution
AT pongratzingemar anamphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution
AT escrivahector anamphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution
AT laudetvincent anamphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution
AT parismathilde amphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution
AT petterssonkatarina amphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution
AT schubertmichael amphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution
AT bertrandstephanie amphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution
AT pongratzingemar amphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution
AT escrivahector amphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution
AT laudetvincent amphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution