Cargando…
An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution
BACKGROUND: The origin of nuclear receptors (NRs) and the question whether the ancestral NR was a liganded or an unliganded transcription factor has been recently debated. To obtain insight into the evolution of the ligand binding ability of estrogen receptors (ER), we comparatively characterized th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2529310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18655705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-219 |
_version_ | 1782158913954643968 |
---|---|
author | Paris, Mathilde Pettersson, Katarina Schubert, Michael Bertrand, Stephanie Pongratz, Ingemar Escriva, Hector Laudet, Vincent |
author_facet | Paris, Mathilde Pettersson, Katarina Schubert, Michael Bertrand, Stephanie Pongratz, Ingemar Escriva, Hector Laudet, Vincent |
author_sort | Paris, Mathilde |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The origin of nuclear receptors (NRs) and the question whether the ancestral NR was a liganded or an unliganded transcription factor has been recently debated. To obtain insight into the evolution of the ligand binding ability of estrogen receptors (ER), we comparatively characterized the ER from the protochordate amphioxus (Branchiostoma floridae), and the ER from lamprey (Petromyzon marinus), a basal vertebrate. RESULTS: Extensive phylogenetic studies as well as signature analysis allowed us to confirm that the amphioxus ER (amphiER) and the lamprey ER (lampER) belong to the ER group. LampER behaves as a "classical" vertebrate ER, as it binds to specific DNA Estrogen Responsive Elements (EREs), and is activated by estradiol (E(2)), the classical ER natural ligand. In contrast, we found that although amphiER binds EREs, it is unable to bind E(2 )and to activate transcription in response to E(2). Among the 7 natural and synthetic ER ligands tested as well as a large repertoire of 14 cholesterol derivatives, only Bisphenol A (an endocrine disruptor with estrogenic activity) bound to amphiER, suggesting that a ligand binding pocket exists within the receptor. Parsimony analysis considering all available ER sequences suggest that the ancestral ER was not able to bind E(2 )and that this ability evolved specifically in the vertebrate lineage. This result does not support a previous analysis based on ancestral sequence reconstruction that proposed the ancestral steroid receptor to bind estradiol. We show that biased taxonomic sampling can alter the calculation of ancestral sequence and that the previous result might stem from a high proportion of vertebrate ERs in the dataset used to compute the ancestral sequence. CONCLUSION: Taken together, our results highlight the importance of comparative experimental approaches vs ancestral reconstructions for the evolutionary study of endocrine systems: comparative analysis of extant ERs suggests that the ancestral ER did not bind estradiol and that it gained the ability to be regulated by estradiol specifically in the vertebrate lineage, before lamprey split. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2529310 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25293102008-09-05 An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution Paris, Mathilde Pettersson, Katarina Schubert, Michael Bertrand, Stephanie Pongratz, Ingemar Escriva, Hector Laudet, Vincent BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The origin of nuclear receptors (NRs) and the question whether the ancestral NR was a liganded or an unliganded transcription factor has been recently debated. To obtain insight into the evolution of the ligand binding ability of estrogen receptors (ER), we comparatively characterized the ER from the protochordate amphioxus (Branchiostoma floridae), and the ER from lamprey (Petromyzon marinus), a basal vertebrate. RESULTS: Extensive phylogenetic studies as well as signature analysis allowed us to confirm that the amphioxus ER (amphiER) and the lamprey ER (lampER) belong to the ER group. LampER behaves as a "classical" vertebrate ER, as it binds to specific DNA Estrogen Responsive Elements (EREs), and is activated by estradiol (E(2)), the classical ER natural ligand. In contrast, we found that although amphiER binds EREs, it is unable to bind E(2 )and to activate transcription in response to E(2). Among the 7 natural and synthetic ER ligands tested as well as a large repertoire of 14 cholesterol derivatives, only Bisphenol A (an endocrine disruptor with estrogenic activity) bound to amphiER, suggesting that a ligand binding pocket exists within the receptor. Parsimony analysis considering all available ER sequences suggest that the ancestral ER was not able to bind E(2 )and that this ability evolved specifically in the vertebrate lineage. This result does not support a previous analysis based on ancestral sequence reconstruction that proposed the ancestral steroid receptor to bind estradiol. We show that biased taxonomic sampling can alter the calculation of ancestral sequence and that the previous result might stem from a high proportion of vertebrate ERs in the dataset used to compute the ancestral sequence. CONCLUSION: Taken together, our results highlight the importance of comparative experimental approaches vs ancestral reconstructions for the evolutionary study of endocrine systems: comparative analysis of extant ERs suggests that the ancestral ER did not bind estradiol and that it gained the ability to be regulated by estradiol specifically in the vertebrate lineage, before lamprey split. BioMed Central 2008-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2529310/ /pubmed/18655705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-219 Text en Copyright ©2008 Paris et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Paris, Mathilde Pettersson, Katarina Schubert, Michael Bertrand, Stephanie Pongratz, Ingemar Escriva, Hector Laudet, Vincent An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution |
title | An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution |
title_full | An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution |
title_fullStr | An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution |
title_full_unstemmed | An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution |
title_short | An amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: Insights into estrogen receptor evolution |
title_sort | amphioxus orthologue of the estrogen receptor that does not bind estradiol: insights into estrogen receptor evolution |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2529310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18655705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-219 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parismathilde anamphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution AT petterssonkatarina anamphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution AT schubertmichael anamphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution AT bertrandstephanie anamphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution AT pongratzingemar anamphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution AT escrivahector anamphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution AT laudetvincent anamphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution AT parismathilde amphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution AT petterssonkatarina amphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution AT schubertmichael amphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution AT bertrandstephanie amphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution AT pongratzingemar amphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution AT escrivahector amphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution AT laudetvincent amphioxusorthologueoftheestrogenreceptorthatdoesnotbindestradiolinsightsintoestrogenreceptorevolution |