Cargando…
Response to Novelty Correlates with Learning Rate in a Go/No-Go Task in Göttingen Minipigs
Novelty-seeking and harm-avoidance personality traits influence Go/No-go (GNG) learning in humans. Animal studies have also indicated a link between response to novelty and spatial discrimination learning. In the present study, we test the hypothesis that learning rate in a GNG task correlates with...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2565465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16444904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/NP.2005.341 |
_version_ | 1782159915935072256 |
---|---|
author | Lind, Nanna Marie Moustgaard, Anette |
author_facet | Lind, Nanna Marie Moustgaard, Anette |
author_sort | Lind, Nanna Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Novelty-seeking and harm-avoidance personality traits influence Go/No-go (GNG) learning in humans. Animal studies have also indicated a link between response to novelty and spatial discrimination learning. In the present study, we test the hypothesis that learning rate in a GNG task correlates with the behavioral response of Göttingen minipigs to novelty. In a group of 12 minipigs of mixed genders, response to novelty was measured by numbers of contacts with a novel object, and the total duration of exploration of the novel object. These parameters were correlated to individual learning rate in a GNG task. The number of sessions to reach criterion in the GNG task correlated significantly with the number of contacts to a novel object (r = 0.70, p = 0.03), but not with the duration of object exploration (r = 0.29, p = 0.41). Thus, pigs with a low behavioral response to novelty learned the GNG task faster than did pigs with a strong behavioral response to novelty, indicated by the tendency to approach novel objects. We hypothesize that the critical factor in this relation is difference in emotional reactivity rather than difference in motivation for exploration. In conclusion, in addition to ‘cognitive’ ability, ‘temperamental’ factors are likely to influence learning in individual pigs. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2565465 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25654652008-10-16 Response to Novelty Correlates with Learning Rate in a Go/No-Go Task in Göttingen Minipigs Lind, Nanna Marie Moustgaard, Anette Neural Plast Article Novelty-seeking and harm-avoidance personality traits influence Go/No-go (GNG) learning in humans. Animal studies have also indicated a link between response to novelty and spatial discrimination learning. In the present study, we test the hypothesis that learning rate in a GNG task correlates with the behavioral response of Göttingen minipigs to novelty. In a group of 12 minipigs of mixed genders, response to novelty was measured by numbers of contacts with a novel object, and the total duration of exploration of the novel object. These parameters were correlated to individual learning rate in a GNG task. The number of sessions to reach criterion in the GNG task correlated significantly with the number of contacts to a novel object (r = 0.70, p = 0.03), but not with the duration of object exploration (r = 0.29, p = 0.41). Thus, pigs with a low behavioral response to novelty learned the GNG task faster than did pigs with a strong behavioral response to novelty, indicated by the tendency to approach novel objects. We hypothesize that the critical factor in this relation is difference in emotional reactivity rather than difference in motivation for exploration. In conclusion, in addition to ‘cognitive’ ability, ‘temperamental’ factors are likely to influence learning in individual pigs. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2005 /pmc/articles/PMC2565465/ /pubmed/16444904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/NP.2005.341 Text en Copyright © 2005 . |
spellingShingle | Article Lind, Nanna Marie Moustgaard, Anette Response to Novelty Correlates with Learning Rate in a Go/No-Go Task in Göttingen Minipigs |
title | Response to Novelty Correlates with Learning Rate in a Go/No-Go Task in Göttingen Minipigs |
title_full | Response to Novelty Correlates with Learning Rate in a Go/No-Go Task in Göttingen Minipigs |
title_fullStr | Response to Novelty Correlates with Learning Rate in a Go/No-Go Task in Göttingen Minipigs |
title_full_unstemmed | Response to Novelty Correlates with Learning Rate in a Go/No-Go Task in Göttingen Minipigs |
title_short | Response to Novelty Correlates with Learning Rate in a Go/No-Go Task in Göttingen Minipigs |
title_sort | response to novelty correlates with learning rate in a go/no-go task in göttingen minipigs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2565465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16444904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/NP.2005.341 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindnannamarie responsetonoveltycorrelateswithlearningrateinagonogotaskingottingenminipigs AT moustgaardanette responsetonoveltycorrelateswithlearningrateinagonogotaskingottingenminipigs |