Cargando…

The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease

BACKGROUND: Related species, such as humans and chimpanzees, often experience the same disease with varying degrees of pathology, as seen in the cases of Alzheimer's disease, or differing symptomatology as in AIDS. Furthermore, certain diseases such as schizophrenia, epithelial cancers and auto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vamathevan, Jessica J, Hasan, Samiul, Emes, Richard D, Amrine-Madsen, Heather, Rajagopalan, Dilip, Topp, Simon D, Kumar, Vinod, Word, Michael, Simmons, Mark D, Foord, Steven M, Sanseau, Philippe, Yang, Ziheng, Holbrook, Joanna D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2576240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18837980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-273
_version_ 1782160374916710400
author Vamathevan, Jessica J
Hasan, Samiul
Emes, Richard D
Amrine-Madsen, Heather
Rajagopalan, Dilip
Topp, Simon D
Kumar, Vinod
Word, Michael
Simmons, Mark D
Foord, Steven M
Sanseau, Philippe
Yang, Ziheng
Holbrook, Joanna D
author_facet Vamathevan, Jessica J
Hasan, Samiul
Emes, Richard D
Amrine-Madsen, Heather
Rajagopalan, Dilip
Topp, Simon D
Kumar, Vinod
Word, Michael
Simmons, Mark D
Foord, Steven M
Sanseau, Philippe
Yang, Ziheng
Holbrook, Joanna D
author_sort Vamathevan, Jessica J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Related species, such as humans and chimpanzees, often experience the same disease with varying degrees of pathology, as seen in the cases of Alzheimer's disease, or differing symptomatology as in AIDS. Furthermore, certain diseases such as schizophrenia, epithelial cancers and autoimmune disorders are far more frequent in humans than in other species for reasons not associated with lifestyle. Genes that have undergone positive selection during species evolution are indicative of functional adaptations that drive species differences. Thus we investigate whether biomedical disease differences between species can be attributed to positively selected genes. RESULTS: We identified genes that putatively underwent positive selection during the evolution of humans and four mammals which are often used to model human diseases (mouse, rat, chimpanzee and dog). We show that genes predicted to have been subject to positive selection pressure during human evolution are implicated in diseases such as epithelial cancers, schizophrenia, autoimmune diseases and Alzheimer's disease, all of which differ in prevalence and symptomatology between humans and their mammalian relatives. In agreement with previous studies, the chimpanzee lineage was found to have more genes under positive selection than any of the other lineages. In addition, we found new evidence to support the hypothesis that genes that have undergone positive selection tend to interact with each other. This is the first such evidence to be detected widely among mammalian genes and may be important in identifying molecular pathways causative of species differences. CONCLUSION: Our dataset of genes predicted to have been subject to positive selection in five species serves as an informative resource that can be consulted prior to selecting appropriate animal models during drug target validation. We conclude that studying the evolution of functional and biomedical disease differences between species is an important way to gain insight into their molecular causes and may provide a method to predict when animal models do not mirror human biology.
format Text
id pubmed-2576240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25762402008-10-31 The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease Vamathevan, Jessica J Hasan, Samiul Emes, Richard D Amrine-Madsen, Heather Rajagopalan, Dilip Topp, Simon D Kumar, Vinod Word, Michael Simmons, Mark D Foord, Steven M Sanseau, Philippe Yang, Ziheng Holbrook, Joanna D BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Related species, such as humans and chimpanzees, often experience the same disease with varying degrees of pathology, as seen in the cases of Alzheimer's disease, or differing symptomatology as in AIDS. Furthermore, certain diseases such as schizophrenia, epithelial cancers and autoimmune disorders are far more frequent in humans than in other species for reasons not associated with lifestyle. Genes that have undergone positive selection during species evolution are indicative of functional adaptations that drive species differences. Thus we investigate whether biomedical disease differences between species can be attributed to positively selected genes. RESULTS: We identified genes that putatively underwent positive selection during the evolution of humans and four mammals which are often used to model human diseases (mouse, rat, chimpanzee and dog). We show that genes predicted to have been subject to positive selection pressure during human evolution are implicated in diseases such as epithelial cancers, schizophrenia, autoimmune diseases and Alzheimer's disease, all of which differ in prevalence and symptomatology between humans and their mammalian relatives. In agreement with previous studies, the chimpanzee lineage was found to have more genes under positive selection than any of the other lineages. In addition, we found new evidence to support the hypothesis that genes that have undergone positive selection tend to interact with each other. This is the first such evidence to be detected widely among mammalian genes and may be important in identifying molecular pathways causative of species differences. CONCLUSION: Our dataset of genes predicted to have been subject to positive selection in five species serves as an informative resource that can be consulted prior to selecting appropriate animal models during drug target validation. We conclude that studying the evolution of functional and biomedical disease differences between species is an important way to gain insight into their molecular causes and may provide a method to predict when animal models do not mirror human biology. BioMed Central 2008-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2576240/ /pubmed/18837980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-273 Text en Copyright ©2008 Vamathevan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vamathevan, Jessica J
Hasan, Samiul
Emes, Richard D
Amrine-Madsen, Heather
Rajagopalan, Dilip
Topp, Simon D
Kumar, Vinod
Word, Michael
Simmons, Mark D
Foord, Steven M
Sanseau, Philippe
Yang, Ziheng
Holbrook, Joanna D
The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease
title The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease
title_full The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease
title_fullStr The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease
title_full_unstemmed The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease
title_short The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease
title_sort role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2576240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18837980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-273
work_keys_str_mv AT vamathevanjessicaj theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT hasansamiul theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT emesrichardd theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT amrinemadsenheather theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT rajagopalandilip theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT toppsimond theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT kumarvinod theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT wordmichael theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT simmonsmarkd theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT foordstevenm theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT sanseauphilippe theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT yangziheng theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT holbrookjoannad theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT vamathevanjessicaj roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT hasansamiul roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT emesrichardd roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT amrinemadsenheather roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT rajagopalandilip roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT toppsimond roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT kumarvinod roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT wordmichael roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT simmonsmarkd roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT foordstevenm roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT sanseauphilippe roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT yangziheng roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease
AT holbrookjoannad roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease