Cargando…
The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease
BACKGROUND: Related species, such as humans and chimpanzees, often experience the same disease with varying degrees of pathology, as seen in the cases of Alzheimer's disease, or differing symptomatology as in AIDS. Furthermore, certain diseases such as schizophrenia, epithelial cancers and auto...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2576240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18837980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-273 |
_version_ | 1782160374916710400 |
---|---|
author | Vamathevan, Jessica J Hasan, Samiul Emes, Richard D Amrine-Madsen, Heather Rajagopalan, Dilip Topp, Simon D Kumar, Vinod Word, Michael Simmons, Mark D Foord, Steven M Sanseau, Philippe Yang, Ziheng Holbrook, Joanna D |
author_facet | Vamathevan, Jessica J Hasan, Samiul Emes, Richard D Amrine-Madsen, Heather Rajagopalan, Dilip Topp, Simon D Kumar, Vinod Word, Michael Simmons, Mark D Foord, Steven M Sanseau, Philippe Yang, Ziheng Holbrook, Joanna D |
author_sort | Vamathevan, Jessica J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Related species, such as humans and chimpanzees, often experience the same disease with varying degrees of pathology, as seen in the cases of Alzheimer's disease, or differing symptomatology as in AIDS. Furthermore, certain diseases such as schizophrenia, epithelial cancers and autoimmune disorders are far more frequent in humans than in other species for reasons not associated with lifestyle. Genes that have undergone positive selection during species evolution are indicative of functional adaptations that drive species differences. Thus we investigate whether biomedical disease differences between species can be attributed to positively selected genes. RESULTS: We identified genes that putatively underwent positive selection during the evolution of humans and four mammals which are often used to model human diseases (mouse, rat, chimpanzee and dog). We show that genes predicted to have been subject to positive selection pressure during human evolution are implicated in diseases such as epithelial cancers, schizophrenia, autoimmune diseases and Alzheimer's disease, all of which differ in prevalence and symptomatology between humans and their mammalian relatives. In agreement with previous studies, the chimpanzee lineage was found to have more genes under positive selection than any of the other lineages. In addition, we found new evidence to support the hypothesis that genes that have undergone positive selection tend to interact with each other. This is the first such evidence to be detected widely among mammalian genes and may be important in identifying molecular pathways causative of species differences. CONCLUSION: Our dataset of genes predicted to have been subject to positive selection in five species serves as an informative resource that can be consulted prior to selecting appropriate animal models during drug target validation. We conclude that studying the evolution of functional and biomedical disease differences between species is an important way to gain insight into their molecular causes and may provide a method to predict when animal models do not mirror human biology. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2576240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25762402008-10-31 The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease Vamathevan, Jessica J Hasan, Samiul Emes, Richard D Amrine-Madsen, Heather Rajagopalan, Dilip Topp, Simon D Kumar, Vinod Word, Michael Simmons, Mark D Foord, Steven M Sanseau, Philippe Yang, Ziheng Holbrook, Joanna D BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Related species, such as humans and chimpanzees, often experience the same disease with varying degrees of pathology, as seen in the cases of Alzheimer's disease, or differing symptomatology as in AIDS. Furthermore, certain diseases such as schizophrenia, epithelial cancers and autoimmune disorders are far more frequent in humans than in other species for reasons not associated with lifestyle. Genes that have undergone positive selection during species evolution are indicative of functional adaptations that drive species differences. Thus we investigate whether biomedical disease differences between species can be attributed to positively selected genes. RESULTS: We identified genes that putatively underwent positive selection during the evolution of humans and four mammals which are often used to model human diseases (mouse, rat, chimpanzee and dog). We show that genes predicted to have been subject to positive selection pressure during human evolution are implicated in diseases such as epithelial cancers, schizophrenia, autoimmune diseases and Alzheimer's disease, all of which differ in prevalence and symptomatology between humans and their mammalian relatives. In agreement with previous studies, the chimpanzee lineage was found to have more genes under positive selection than any of the other lineages. In addition, we found new evidence to support the hypothesis that genes that have undergone positive selection tend to interact with each other. This is the first such evidence to be detected widely among mammalian genes and may be important in identifying molecular pathways causative of species differences. CONCLUSION: Our dataset of genes predicted to have been subject to positive selection in five species serves as an informative resource that can be consulted prior to selecting appropriate animal models during drug target validation. We conclude that studying the evolution of functional and biomedical disease differences between species is an important way to gain insight into their molecular causes and may provide a method to predict when animal models do not mirror human biology. BioMed Central 2008-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2576240/ /pubmed/18837980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-273 Text en Copyright ©2008 Vamathevan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vamathevan, Jessica J Hasan, Samiul Emes, Richard D Amrine-Madsen, Heather Rajagopalan, Dilip Topp, Simon D Kumar, Vinod Word, Michael Simmons, Mark D Foord, Steven M Sanseau, Philippe Yang, Ziheng Holbrook, Joanna D The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease |
title | The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease |
title_full | The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease |
title_fullStr | The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease |
title_short | The role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease |
title_sort | role of positive selection in determining the molecular cause of species differences in disease |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2576240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18837980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vamathevanjessicaj theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT hasansamiul theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT emesrichardd theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT amrinemadsenheather theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT rajagopalandilip theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT toppsimond theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT kumarvinod theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT wordmichael theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT simmonsmarkd theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT foordstevenm theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT sanseauphilippe theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT yangziheng theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT holbrookjoannad theroleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT vamathevanjessicaj roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT hasansamiul roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT emesrichardd roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT amrinemadsenheather roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT rajagopalandilip roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT toppsimond roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT kumarvinod roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT wordmichael roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT simmonsmarkd roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT foordstevenm roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT sanseauphilippe roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT yangziheng roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease AT holbrookjoannad roleofpositiveselectionindeterminingthemolecularcauseofspeciesdifferencesindisease |