Cargando…

Improving peptide-MHC class I binding prediction for unbalanced datasets

BACKGROUND: Establishment of peptide binding to Major Histocompatibility Complex class I (MHCI) is a crucial step in the development of subunit vaccines and prediction of such binding could greatly reduce costs and accelerate the experimental process of identifying immunogenic peptides. Many methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sales, Ana Paula, Tomaras, Georgia D, Kepler, Thomas B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2586639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18803836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-385
_version_ 1782160901783158784
author Sales, Ana Paula
Tomaras, Georgia D
Kepler, Thomas B
author_facet Sales, Ana Paula
Tomaras, Georgia D
Kepler, Thomas B
author_sort Sales, Ana Paula
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Establishment of peptide binding to Major Histocompatibility Complex class I (MHCI) is a crucial step in the development of subunit vaccines and prediction of such binding could greatly reduce costs and accelerate the experimental process of identifying immunogenic peptides. Many methods have been applied to the prediction of peptide-MHCI binding, with some achieving outstanding performance. Because of the experimental methods used to measure binding or affinity between peptides and MHCI molecules, however, available datasets are enriched for nonbinders, and thus highly unbalanced. Although there is no consensus on the ideal class distribution for training sets, extremely unbalanced datasets can be detrimental to the performance of prediction algorithms. RESULTS: We have developed a decision-theoretic framework to construct cost-sensitive trees to predict peptide-MHCI binding and have used them to 1) Assess the impact of the training data's class distribution on classifier accuracy, and 2) Compare resampling and cost-sensitive methods as approaches to compensate for training data imbalance. Our results confirm that highly unbalanced training sets can reduce the accuracy of classifier predictions and show that, in the peptide-MHCI binding context, resampling methods do not improve the classifier performance. In contrast, cost-sensitive methods significantly improve accuracy of decision trees. Finally, we propose the use of a training scheme that, when the training set is enriched for nonbinders, consistently improves the overall classifier accuracy compared to cost-insensitive classifiers and, in particular, increases the sensitivity of the classifiers. This method minimizes the expected classification cost for large datasets. CONCLUSION: Our method consistently improves the performance of decision trees in predicting peptide-MHC class I binding by using cost-balancing techniques to compensate for the imbalance in the training dataset.
format Text
id pubmed-2586639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25866392008-11-25 Improving peptide-MHC class I binding prediction for unbalanced datasets Sales, Ana Paula Tomaras, Georgia D Kepler, Thomas B BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Establishment of peptide binding to Major Histocompatibility Complex class I (MHCI) is a crucial step in the development of subunit vaccines and prediction of such binding could greatly reduce costs and accelerate the experimental process of identifying immunogenic peptides. Many methods have been applied to the prediction of peptide-MHCI binding, with some achieving outstanding performance. Because of the experimental methods used to measure binding or affinity between peptides and MHCI molecules, however, available datasets are enriched for nonbinders, and thus highly unbalanced. Although there is no consensus on the ideal class distribution for training sets, extremely unbalanced datasets can be detrimental to the performance of prediction algorithms. RESULTS: We have developed a decision-theoretic framework to construct cost-sensitive trees to predict peptide-MHCI binding and have used them to 1) Assess the impact of the training data's class distribution on classifier accuracy, and 2) Compare resampling and cost-sensitive methods as approaches to compensate for training data imbalance. Our results confirm that highly unbalanced training sets can reduce the accuracy of classifier predictions and show that, in the peptide-MHCI binding context, resampling methods do not improve the classifier performance. In contrast, cost-sensitive methods significantly improve accuracy of decision trees. Finally, we propose the use of a training scheme that, when the training set is enriched for nonbinders, consistently improves the overall classifier accuracy compared to cost-insensitive classifiers and, in particular, increases the sensitivity of the classifiers. This method minimizes the expected classification cost for large datasets. CONCLUSION: Our method consistently improves the performance of decision trees in predicting peptide-MHC class I binding by using cost-balancing techniques to compensate for the imbalance in the training dataset. BioMed Central 2008-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2586639/ /pubmed/18803836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-385 Text en Copyright © 2008 Sales et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sales, Ana Paula
Tomaras, Georgia D
Kepler, Thomas B
Improving peptide-MHC class I binding prediction for unbalanced datasets
title Improving peptide-MHC class I binding prediction for unbalanced datasets
title_full Improving peptide-MHC class I binding prediction for unbalanced datasets
title_fullStr Improving peptide-MHC class I binding prediction for unbalanced datasets
title_full_unstemmed Improving peptide-MHC class I binding prediction for unbalanced datasets
title_short Improving peptide-MHC class I binding prediction for unbalanced datasets
title_sort improving peptide-mhc class i binding prediction for unbalanced datasets
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2586639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18803836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-385
work_keys_str_mv AT salesanapaula improvingpeptidemhcclassibindingpredictionforunbalanceddatasets
AT tomarasgeorgiad improvingpeptidemhcclassibindingpredictionforunbalanceddatasets
AT keplerthomasb improvingpeptidemhcclassibindingpredictionforunbalanceddatasets