Cargando…

Dietary protein safety and resistance exercise: what do we really know?

Resistance trainers continue to receive mixed messages about the safety of purposely seeking ample dietary protein in their quest for stimulating protein synthesis, improving performance, or maintaining health. Despite protein's lay popularity and the routinely high intakes exhibited by strengt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lowery, Lonnie M, Devia, Lorena
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2631482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19138405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-6-3
_version_ 1782163929680576512
author Lowery, Lonnie M
Devia, Lorena
author_facet Lowery, Lonnie M
Devia, Lorena
author_sort Lowery, Lonnie M
collection PubMed
description Resistance trainers continue to receive mixed messages about the safety of purposely seeking ample dietary protein in their quest for stimulating protein synthesis, improving performance, or maintaining health. Despite protein's lay popularity and the routinely high intakes exhibited by strength athletes, liberal and purposeful protein consumption is often maligned by "experts". University textbooks, instructors, and various forms of literature from personal training groups and athletic organizations continue to use dissuasive language surrounding dietary protein. Due to the widely known health benefits of dietary protein and a growing body of evidence on its safety profile, this is unfortunate. In response, researchers have critiqued unfounded educational messages. As a recent summarizing example, the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) Position Stand: Protein and Exercise reviewed general literature on renal and bone health. The concluding remark that "Concerns that protein intake within this range [1.4 – 2.0 g/kg body weight per day] is unhealthy are unfounded in healthy, exercising individuals." was based largely upon data from non-athletes due to "a lack of scientific evidence". Future studies were deemed necessary. This assessment is not unique in the scientific literature. Investigators continue to cite controversy, debate, and the lack of direct evidence that allows it. This review discusses the few existing safety studies done specific to athletes and calls for protein research specific to resistance trainers. Population-specific, long term data will be necessary for effective education in dietetics textbooks and from sports governing bodies.
format Text
id pubmed-2631482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26314822009-01-28 Dietary protein safety and resistance exercise: what do we really know? Lowery, Lonnie M Devia, Lorena J Int Soc Sports Nutr Review Resistance trainers continue to receive mixed messages about the safety of purposely seeking ample dietary protein in their quest for stimulating protein synthesis, improving performance, or maintaining health. Despite protein's lay popularity and the routinely high intakes exhibited by strength athletes, liberal and purposeful protein consumption is often maligned by "experts". University textbooks, instructors, and various forms of literature from personal training groups and athletic organizations continue to use dissuasive language surrounding dietary protein. Due to the widely known health benefits of dietary protein and a growing body of evidence on its safety profile, this is unfortunate. In response, researchers have critiqued unfounded educational messages. As a recent summarizing example, the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) Position Stand: Protein and Exercise reviewed general literature on renal and bone health. The concluding remark that "Concerns that protein intake within this range [1.4 – 2.0 g/kg body weight per day] is unhealthy are unfounded in healthy, exercising individuals." was based largely upon data from non-athletes due to "a lack of scientific evidence". Future studies were deemed necessary. This assessment is not unique in the scientific literature. Investigators continue to cite controversy, debate, and the lack of direct evidence that allows it. This review discusses the few existing safety studies done specific to athletes and calls for protein research specific to resistance trainers. Population-specific, long term data will be necessary for effective education in dietetics textbooks and from sports governing bodies. BioMed Central 2009-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2631482/ /pubmed/19138405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-6-3 Text en Copyright © 2009 Lowery and Devia; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Lowery, Lonnie M
Devia, Lorena
Dietary protein safety and resistance exercise: what do we really know?
title Dietary protein safety and resistance exercise: what do we really know?
title_full Dietary protein safety and resistance exercise: what do we really know?
title_fullStr Dietary protein safety and resistance exercise: what do we really know?
title_full_unstemmed Dietary protein safety and resistance exercise: what do we really know?
title_short Dietary protein safety and resistance exercise: what do we really know?
title_sort dietary protein safety and resistance exercise: what do we really know?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2631482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19138405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-6-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lowerylonniem dietaryproteinsafetyandresistanceexercisewhatdowereallyknow
AT devialorena dietaryproteinsafetyandresistanceexercisewhatdowereallyknow