Cargando…

A phase III trial of topotecan and whole brain radiation therapy for patients with CNS-metastases due to lung cancer

Brain metastases represent an important cause of morbidity in patients with lung cancer and are associated with a mean survival of less than 6 months. Thus, new regimens improving the outcome of these patients are urgently needed. On the basis of promising data raised in a phase I/II trial, we initi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neuhaus, T, Ko, Y, Muller, R P, Grabenbauer, G G, Hedde, J P, Schueller, H, Kocher, M, Stier, S, Fietkau, R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2634726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19127261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604835
_version_ 1782164152731566080
author Neuhaus, T
Ko, Y
Muller, R P
Grabenbauer, G G
Hedde, J P
Schueller, H
Kocher, M
Stier, S
Fietkau, R
author_facet Neuhaus, T
Ko, Y
Muller, R P
Grabenbauer, G G
Hedde, J P
Schueller, H
Kocher, M
Stier, S
Fietkau, R
author_sort Neuhaus, T
collection PubMed
description Brain metastases represent an important cause of morbidity in patients with lung cancer and are associated with a mean survival of less than 6 months. Thus, new regimens improving the outcome of these patients are urgently needed. On the basis of promising data raised in a phase I/II trial, we initiated an open, randomised, prospective, multicentric phase III trial, comparing whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT; 20 × 2 Gy) alone with WBRT+topotecan (RCT; 0.4 mg m(−2) day(−1) × 20). A total of 320 patients with CNS-metastases due to SCLC or NSCLC were projected. The primary end point was overall survival, whereas second end points were local response and progression-free survival. However, until the cutoff date of study completion (i.e., a study duration of 34 months), only a total of 96 (RCT:47, WBRT:49) patients had been recruited, and so an analysis was performed at that time point. Although the numbers of grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities (besides alopecia 115 (RCT/WBRT: 55 out of 60) were evenly distributed, the 25 haematological events occurred mainly in the combined treatment arm (24 out of 1). Local response, evaluated 2 weeks after treatment, was assessable in 44 (RCT/WBRT: 23 out of 21) patients, showing CR in eight (3 out of 5), PR in 17 (11 out of 6), SD in 14 (8 out of 6) and PD in five (1 out of 4) patients (all differences n.s.). Neither OAS (RCT/WBRT: median (days)): 87 out of 95, range 3–752/4–433; HR 1.32; 95% CI (0.83; 2.10)) nor PFS (median (days)): 71 out of 66, range, 3–399/4–228; HR 1.28, 95% CI (0.73; 2.43) differed significantly. On the basis of these results and the slow recruitment, a continuation of the study did not seem reasonable. The available data show no significant advantage for concurrent radiochemotherapy for patients with lung cancer; however, the recruited number of patients is too low to exhibit a small advantage of combined treatment.
format Text
id pubmed-2634726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26347262010-01-27 A phase III trial of topotecan and whole brain radiation therapy for patients with CNS-metastases due to lung cancer Neuhaus, T Ko, Y Muller, R P Grabenbauer, G G Hedde, J P Schueller, H Kocher, M Stier, S Fietkau, R Br J Cancer Clinical Study Brain metastases represent an important cause of morbidity in patients with lung cancer and are associated with a mean survival of less than 6 months. Thus, new regimens improving the outcome of these patients are urgently needed. On the basis of promising data raised in a phase I/II trial, we initiated an open, randomised, prospective, multicentric phase III trial, comparing whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT; 20 × 2 Gy) alone with WBRT+topotecan (RCT; 0.4 mg m(−2) day(−1) × 20). A total of 320 patients with CNS-metastases due to SCLC or NSCLC were projected. The primary end point was overall survival, whereas second end points were local response and progression-free survival. However, until the cutoff date of study completion (i.e., a study duration of 34 months), only a total of 96 (RCT:47, WBRT:49) patients had been recruited, and so an analysis was performed at that time point. Although the numbers of grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities (besides alopecia 115 (RCT/WBRT: 55 out of 60) were evenly distributed, the 25 haematological events occurred mainly in the combined treatment arm (24 out of 1). Local response, evaluated 2 weeks after treatment, was assessable in 44 (RCT/WBRT: 23 out of 21) patients, showing CR in eight (3 out of 5), PR in 17 (11 out of 6), SD in 14 (8 out of 6) and PD in five (1 out of 4) patients (all differences n.s.). Neither OAS (RCT/WBRT: median (days)): 87 out of 95, range 3–752/4–433; HR 1.32; 95% CI (0.83; 2.10)) nor PFS (median (days)): 71 out of 66, range, 3–399/4–228; HR 1.28, 95% CI (0.73; 2.43) differed significantly. On the basis of these results and the slow recruitment, a continuation of the study did not seem reasonable. The available data show no significant advantage for concurrent radiochemotherapy for patients with lung cancer; however, the recruited number of patients is too low to exhibit a small advantage of combined treatment. Nature Publishing Group 2009-01-27 2009-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2634726/ /pubmed/19127261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604835 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Neuhaus, T
Ko, Y
Muller, R P
Grabenbauer, G G
Hedde, J P
Schueller, H
Kocher, M
Stier, S
Fietkau, R
A phase III trial of topotecan and whole brain radiation therapy for patients with CNS-metastases due to lung cancer
title A phase III trial of topotecan and whole brain radiation therapy for patients with CNS-metastases due to lung cancer
title_full A phase III trial of topotecan and whole brain radiation therapy for patients with CNS-metastases due to lung cancer
title_fullStr A phase III trial of topotecan and whole brain radiation therapy for patients with CNS-metastases due to lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed A phase III trial of topotecan and whole brain radiation therapy for patients with CNS-metastases due to lung cancer
title_short A phase III trial of topotecan and whole brain radiation therapy for patients with CNS-metastases due to lung cancer
title_sort phase iii trial of topotecan and whole brain radiation therapy for patients with cns-metastases due to lung cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2634726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19127261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604835
work_keys_str_mv AT neuhaust aphaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT koy aphaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT mullerrp aphaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT grabenbauergg aphaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT heddejp aphaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT schuellerh aphaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT kocherm aphaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT stiers aphaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT fietkaur aphaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT neuhaust phaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT koy phaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT mullerrp phaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT grabenbauergg phaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT heddejp phaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT schuellerh phaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT kocherm phaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT stiers phaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer
AT fietkaur phaseiiitrialoftopotecanandwholebrainradiationtherapyforpatientswithcnsmetastasesduetolungcancer