Cargando…

Effect of topical alkane vapocoolant spray on pain with intravenous cannulation in patients in emergency departments: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial

Objective To assess the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of a topical alkane vapocoolant in reducing pain during intravenous cannulation in adults. Design Randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. Setting Emergency department of a metropolitan teaching hospital. Participants 201 adult pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hijazi, Ramzi, Taylor, David, Richardson, Joanna
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2640112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19208703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b215
_version_ 1782164524758990848
author Hijazi, Ramzi
Taylor, David
Richardson, Joanna
author_facet Hijazi, Ramzi
Taylor, David
Richardson, Joanna
author_sort Hijazi, Ramzi
collection PubMed
description Objective To assess the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of a topical alkane vapocoolant in reducing pain during intravenous cannulation in adults. Design Randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. Setting Emergency department of a metropolitan teaching hospital. Participants 201 adult patients (54% male), mean (SD) age 58.2 (19.5) years, who required intravenous cannulation. Interventions Less than 15 seconds before cannulation, the skin area was sprayed with either water (control, n=98) or vapocoolant (intervention, n=103), from a distance of 12 cm for 2 seconds. The intervention spray was a blend of propane, butane, and pentane. Main outcome measures Pain with cannulation and discomfort with spray, measured with a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Results Groups did not differ significantly in age, sex, indication for or site of cannulation, cannula size, or who cannulated the patient (P>0.05). Median (interquartile range) pain scores for cannulation in the control and intervention groups were 36 (19-51) and 12 (5-40) mm, respectively (P<0.001), and 59 (60%) and 33 (32%) reported pain scores ≥30 mm (P<0.001). Scores for spray discomfort also differed significantly (P<0.001) because of skewing to the right within the intervention group. The median discomfort scores, however, were 0 mm in both groups. Success rates for first cannulation attempt did not differ between groups (P=0.39). Thirty four (39%) and 62 (62%) patients said they would choose the spray they received for analgesia in the future (P=0.002). At follow-up at five days, two patients in the intervention group reported transient skin redness. Conclusions Topical alkane vapocoolant spray is effective, acceptable, and safe in reducing pain with peripheral intravenous cannulation in adults in the emergency department. Trial registration Australian Clinical Trials ACTRN12607000470493.
format Text
id pubmed-2640112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26401122009-02-12 Effect of topical alkane vapocoolant spray on pain with intravenous cannulation in patients in emergency departments: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial Hijazi, Ramzi Taylor, David Richardson, Joanna BMJ Research Objective To assess the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of a topical alkane vapocoolant in reducing pain during intravenous cannulation in adults. Design Randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. Setting Emergency department of a metropolitan teaching hospital. Participants 201 adult patients (54% male), mean (SD) age 58.2 (19.5) years, who required intravenous cannulation. Interventions Less than 15 seconds before cannulation, the skin area was sprayed with either water (control, n=98) or vapocoolant (intervention, n=103), from a distance of 12 cm for 2 seconds. The intervention spray was a blend of propane, butane, and pentane. Main outcome measures Pain with cannulation and discomfort with spray, measured with a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Results Groups did not differ significantly in age, sex, indication for or site of cannulation, cannula size, or who cannulated the patient (P>0.05). Median (interquartile range) pain scores for cannulation in the control and intervention groups were 36 (19-51) and 12 (5-40) mm, respectively (P<0.001), and 59 (60%) and 33 (32%) reported pain scores ≥30 mm (P<0.001). Scores for spray discomfort also differed significantly (P<0.001) because of skewing to the right within the intervention group. The median discomfort scores, however, were 0 mm in both groups. Success rates for first cannulation attempt did not differ between groups (P=0.39). Thirty four (39%) and 62 (62%) patients said they would choose the spray they received for analgesia in the future (P=0.002). At follow-up at five days, two patients in the intervention group reported transient skin redness. Conclusions Topical alkane vapocoolant spray is effective, acceptable, and safe in reducing pain with peripheral intravenous cannulation in adults in the emergency department. Trial registration Australian Clinical Trials ACTRN12607000470493. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2640112/ /pubmed/19208703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b215 Text en © Hijazi et al 2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hijazi, Ramzi
Taylor, David
Richardson, Joanna
Effect of topical alkane vapocoolant spray on pain with intravenous cannulation in patients in emergency departments: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial
title Effect of topical alkane vapocoolant spray on pain with intravenous cannulation in patients in emergency departments: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial
title_full Effect of topical alkane vapocoolant spray on pain with intravenous cannulation in patients in emergency departments: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial
title_fullStr Effect of topical alkane vapocoolant spray on pain with intravenous cannulation in patients in emergency departments: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of topical alkane vapocoolant spray on pain with intravenous cannulation in patients in emergency departments: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial
title_short Effect of topical alkane vapocoolant spray on pain with intravenous cannulation in patients in emergency departments: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial
title_sort effect of topical alkane vapocoolant spray on pain with intravenous cannulation in patients in emergency departments: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2640112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19208703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b215
work_keys_str_mv AT hijaziramzi effectoftopicalalkanevapocoolantsprayonpainwithintravenouscannulationinpatientsinemergencydepartmentsrandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT taylordavid effectoftopicalalkanevapocoolantsprayonpainwithintravenouscannulationinpatientsinemergencydepartmentsrandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT richardsonjoanna effectoftopicalalkanevapocoolantsprayonpainwithintravenouscannulationinpatientsinemergencydepartmentsrandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial