Cargando…
An evaluation of the performance in the UK Royal College of Anaesthetists primary examination by UK medical school and gender
BACKGROUND: There has been comparatively little consideration of the impact that the changes to undergraduate curricula might have on postgraduate academic performance. This study compares the performance of graduates by UK medical school and gender in the Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) section of t...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2707380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19563655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-38 |
_version_ | 1782169140852686848 |
---|---|
author | Bowhay, Andrew R Watmough, Simon D |
author_facet | Bowhay, Andrew R Watmough, Simon D |
author_sort | Bowhay, Andrew R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There has been comparatively little consideration of the impact that the changes to undergraduate curricula might have on postgraduate academic performance. This study compares the performance of graduates by UK medical school and gender in the Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) section of the first part of the Fellowship of the Royal College of Anaesthetists (FRCA) examination. METHODS: Data from each sitting of the MCQ section of the primary FRCA examination from June 1999 to May 2008 were analysed for performance by medical school and gender. RESULTS: There were 4983 attempts at the MCQ part of the examination by 3303 graduates from the 19 United Kingdom medical schools. Using the standardised overall mark minus the pass mark graduates from five medical schools performed significantly better than the mean for the group and five schools performed significantly worse than the mean for the group. Males performed significantly better than females in all aspects of the MCQ – physiology, mean difference = 3.0% (95% CI 2.3, 3.7), p < 0.001; pharmacology, mean difference = 1.7% (95% CI 1.0, 2.3), p < 0.001; physics with clinical measurement, mean difference = 3.5% (95% CI 2.8, 4.1), p < 0.001; overall mark, mean difference = 2.7% (95% CI 2.1, 3.3), p < 0.001; and standardised overall mark minus the pass mark, mean difference = 2.5% (95% CI 1.9, 3.1), p < 0.001. Graduates from three medical schools that have undergone the change from Traditional to Problem Based Learning curricula did not show any change in performance in any aspects of the MCQ pre and post curriculum change. CONCLUSION: Graduates from each of the medical schools in the UK do show differences in performance in the MCQ section of the primary FRCA, but significant curriculum change does not lead to deterioration in post graduate examination performance. Whilst females now outnumber males taking the MCQ, they are not performing as well as the males. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2707380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27073802009-07-09 An evaluation of the performance in the UK Royal College of Anaesthetists primary examination by UK medical school and gender Bowhay, Andrew R Watmough, Simon D BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: There has been comparatively little consideration of the impact that the changes to undergraduate curricula might have on postgraduate academic performance. This study compares the performance of graduates by UK medical school and gender in the Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) section of the first part of the Fellowship of the Royal College of Anaesthetists (FRCA) examination. METHODS: Data from each sitting of the MCQ section of the primary FRCA examination from June 1999 to May 2008 were analysed for performance by medical school and gender. RESULTS: There were 4983 attempts at the MCQ part of the examination by 3303 graduates from the 19 United Kingdom medical schools. Using the standardised overall mark minus the pass mark graduates from five medical schools performed significantly better than the mean for the group and five schools performed significantly worse than the mean for the group. Males performed significantly better than females in all aspects of the MCQ – physiology, mean difference = 3.0% (95% CI 2.3, 3.7), p < 0.001; pharmacology, mean difference = 1.7% (95% CI 1.0, 2.3), p < 0.001; physics with clinical measurement, mean difference = 3.5% (95% CI 2.8, 4.1), p < 0.001; overall mark, mean difference = 2.7% (95% CI 2.1, 3.3), p < 0.001; and standardised overall mark minus the pass mark, mean difference = 2.5% (95% CI 1.9, 3.1), p < 0.001. Graduates from three medical schools that have undergone the change from Traditional to Problem Based Learning curricula did not show any change in performance in any aspects of the MCQ pre and post curriculum change. CONCLUSION: Graduates from each of the medical schools in the UK do show differences in performance in the MCQ section of the primary FRCA, but significant curriculum change does not lead to deterioration in post graduate examination performance. Whilst females now outnumber males taking the MCQ, they are not performing as well as the males. BioMed Central 2009-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2707380/ /pubmed/19563655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-38 Text en Copyright © 2009 Bowhay and Watmough; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bowhay, Andrew R Watmough, Simon D An evaluation of the performance in the UK Royal College of Anaesthetists primary examination by UK medical school and gender |
title | An evaluation of the performance in the UK Royal College of Anaesthetists primary examination by UK medical school and gender |
title_full | An evaluation of the performance in the UK Royal College of Anaesthetists primary examination by UK medical school and gender |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of the performance in the UK Royal College of Anaesthetists primary examination by UK medical school and gender |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of the performance in the UK Royal College of Anaesthetists primary examination by UK medical school and gender |
title_short | An evaluation of the performance in the UK Royal College of Anaesthetists primary examination by UK medical school and gender |
title_sort | evaluation of the performance in the uk royal college of anaesthetists primary examination by uk medical school and gender |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2707380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19563655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-38 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bowhayandrewr anevaluationoftheperformanceintheukroyalcollegeofanaesthetistsprimaryexaminationbyukmedicalschoolandgender AT watmoughsimond anevaluationoftheperformanceintheukroyalcollegeofanaesthetistsprimaryexaminationbyukmedicalschoolandgender AT bowhayandrewr evaluationoftheperformanceintheukroyalcollegeofanaesthetistsprimaryexaminationbyukmedicalschoolandgender AT watmoughsimond evaluationoftheperformanceintheukroyalcollegeofanaesthetistsprimaryexaminationbyukmedicalschoolandgender |