Cargando…
Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA
The recent discovery of the RNA interference mechanism emphasizes the biological importance of short, isolated, double-stranded (ds) RNA helices and calls for a complete understanding of the biophysical properties of dsRNA. However, most previous studies of the electrostatics of nucleic acid duplexe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19395592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp257 |
_version_ | 1782169300651474944 |
---|---|
author | Pabit, Suzette A. Qiu, Xiangyun Lamb, Jessica S. Li, Li Meisburger, Steve P. Pollack, Lois |
author_facet | Pabit, Suzette A. Qiu, Xiangyun Lamb, Jessica S. Li, Li Meisburger, Steve P. Pollack, Lois |
author_sort | Pabit, Suzette A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The recent discovery of the RNA interference mechanism emphasizes the biological importance of short, isolated, double-stranded (ds) RNA helices and calls for a complete understanding of the biophysical properties of dsRNA. However, most previous studies of the electrostatics of nucleic acid duplexes have focused on DNA. Here, we present a comparative investigation of electrostatic effects in RNA and DNA. Using resonant (anomalous) and non-resonant small-angle X-ray scattering, we characterized the charge screening efficiency and counterion distribution around short (25 bp) dsDNA and RNA molecules of comparable sequence. Consistent with theoretical predictions, we find counterion mediated screening to be more efficient for dsRNA than dsDNA. Furthermore, the topology of the RNA A-form helix alters the spatial distribution of counterions relative to B-form DNA. The experimental results reported here agree well with ion-size-corrected non-linear Poisson–Boltzmann calculations. We propose that differences in electrostatic properties aid in selective recognition of different types of short nucleic acid helices by target binding partners. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2709557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27095572009-07-14 Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA Pabit, Suzette A. Qiu, Xiangyun Lamb, Jessica S. Li, Li Meisburger, Steve P. Pollack, Lois Nucleic Acids Res RNA The recent discovery of the RNA interference mechanism emphasizes the biological importance of short, isolated, double-stranded (ds) RNA helices and calls for a complete understanding of the biophysical properties of dsRNA. However, most previous studies of the electrostatics of nucleic acid duplexes have focused on DNA. Here, we present a comparative investigation of electrostatic effects in RNA and DNA. Using resonant (anomalous) and non-resonant small-angle X-ray scattering, we characterized the charge screening efficiency and counterion distribution around short (25 bp) dsDNA and RNA molecules of comparable sequence. Consistent with theoretical predictions, we find counterion mediated screening to be more efficient for dsRNA than dsDNA. Furthermore, the topology of the RNA A-form helix alters the spatial distribution of counterions relative to B-form DNA. The experimental results reported here agree well with ion-size-corrected non-linear Poisson–Boltzmann calculations. We propose that differences in electrostatic properties aid in selective recognition of different types of short nucleic acid helices by target binding partners. Oxford University Press 2009-07 2009-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2709557/ /pubmed/19395592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp257 Text en © 2009 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RNA Pabit, Suzette A. Qiu, Xiangyun Lamb, Jessica S. Li, Li Meisburger, Steve P. Pollack, Lois Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA |
title | Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA |
title_full | Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA |
title_fullStr | Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA |
title_full_unstemmed | Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA |
title_short | Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA |
title_sort | both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsrna compared with dsdna |
topic | RNA |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19395592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp257 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pabitsuzettea bothhelixtopologyandcounteriondistributioncontributetothemoreeffectivechargescreeningindsrnacomparedwithdsdna AT qiuxiangyun bothhelixtopologyandcounteriondistributioncontributetothemoreeffectivechargescreeningindsrnacomparedwithdsdna AT lambjessicas bothhelixtopologyandcounteriondistributioncontributetothemoreeffectivechargescreeningindsrnacomparedwithdsdna AT lili bothhelixtopologyandcounteriondistributioncontributetothemoreeffectivechargescreeningindsrnacomparedwithdsdna AT meisburgerstevep bothhelixtopologyandcounteriondistributioncontributetothemoreeffectivechargescreeningindsrnacomparedwithdsdna AT pollacklois bothhelixtopologyandcounteriondistributioncontributetothemoreeffectivechargescreeningindsrnacomparedwithdsdna |