Cargando…

Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA

The recent discovery of the RNA interference mechanism emphasizes the biological importance of short, isolated, double-stranded (ds) RNA helices and calls for a complete understanding of the biophysical properties of dsRNA. However, most previous studies of the electrostatics of nucleic acid duplexe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pabit, Suzette A., Qiu, Xiangyun, Lamb, Jessica S., Li, Li, Meisburger, Steve P., Pollack, Lois
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2009
Materias:
RNA
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19395592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp257
_version_ 1782169300651474944
author Pabit, Suzette A.
Qiu, Xiangyun
Lamb, Jessica S.
Li, Li
Meisburger, Steve P.
Pollack, Lois
author_facet Pabit, Suzette A.
Qiu, Xiangyun
Lamb, Jessica S.
Li, Li
Meisburger, Steve P.
Pollack, Lois
author_sort Pabit, Suzette A.
collection PubMed
description The recent discovery of the RNA interference mechanism emphasizes the biological importance of short, isolated, double-stranded (ds) RNA helices and calls for a complete understanding of the biophysical properties of dsRNA. However, most previous studies of the electrostatics of nucleic acid duplexes have focused on DNA. Here, we present a comparative investigation of electrostatic effects in RNA and DNA. Using resonant (anomalous) and non-resonant small-angle X-ray scattering, we characterized the charge screening efficiency and counterion distribution around short (25 bp) dsDNA and RNA molecules of comparable sequence. Consistent with theoretical predictions, we find counterion mediated screening to be more efficient for dsRNA than dsDNA. Furthermore, the topology of the RNA A-form helix alters the spatial distribution of counterions relative to B-form DNA. The experimental results reported here agree well with ion-size-corrected non-linear Poisson–Boltzmann calculations. We propose that differences in electrostatic properties aid in selective recognition of different types of short nucleic acid helices by target binding partners.
format Text
id pubmed-2709557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27095572009-07-14 Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA Pabit, Suzette A. Qiu, Xiangyun Lamb, Jessica S. Li, Li Meisburger, Steve P. Pollack, Lois Nucleic Acids Res RNA The recent discovery of the RNA interference mechanism emphasizes the biological importance of short, isolated, double-stranded (ds) RNA helices and calls for a complete understanding of the biophysical properties of dsRNA. However, most previous studies of the electrostatics of nucleic acid duplexes have focused on DNA. Here, we present a comparative investigation of electrostatic effects in RNA and DNA. Using resonant (anomalous) and non-resonant small-angle X-ray scattering, we characterized the charge screening efficiency and counterion distribution around short (25 bp) dsDNA and RNA molecules of comparable sequence. Consistent with theoretical predictions, we find counterion mediated screening to be more efficient for dsRNA than dsDNA. Furthermore, the topology of the RNA A-form helix alters the spatial distribution of counterions relative to B-form DNA. The experimental results reported here agree well with ion-size-corrected non-linear Poisson–Boltzmann calculations. We propose that differences in electrostatic properties aid in selective recognition of different types of short nucleic acid helices by target binding partners. Oxford University Press 2009-07 2009-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2709557/ /pubmed/19395592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp257 Text en © 2009 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RNA
Pabit, Suzette A.
Qiu, Xiangyun
Lamb, Jessica S.
Li, Li
Meisburger, Steve P.
Pollack, Lois
Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA
title Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA
title_full Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA
title_fullStr Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA
title_full_unstemmed Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA
title_short Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA
title_sort both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsrna compared with dsdna
topic RNA
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19395592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp257
work_keys_str_mv AT pabitsuzettea bothhelixtopologyandcounteriondistributioncontributetothemoreeffectivechargescreeningindsrnacomparedwithdsdna
AT qiuxiangyun bothhelixtopologyandcounteriondistributioncontributetothemoreeffectivechargescreeningindsrnacomparedwithdsdna
AT lambjessicas bothhelixtopologyandcounteriondistributioncontributetothemoreeffectivechargescreeningindsrnacomparedwithdsdna
AT lili bothhelixtopologyandcounteriondistributioncontributetothemoreeffectivechargescreeningindsrnacomparedwithdsdna
AT meisburgerstevep bothhelixtopologyandcounteriondistributioncontributetothemoreeffectivechargescreeningindsrnacomparedwithdsdna
AT pollacklois bothhelixtopologyandcounteriondistributioncontributetothemoreeffectivechargescreeningindsrnacomparedwithdsdna