Cargando…

Evaluation of RTS,S/AS02A and RTS,S/AS01B in Adults in a High Malaria Transmission Area

BACKGROUND: This study advances the clinical development of the RTS,S/AS01B candidate malaria vaccine to malaria endemic populations. As a primary objective it compares the safety and reactogenicity of RTS,S/AS01B to the more extensively evaluated RTS,S/AS02A vaccine. METHODOLOGY: A Phase IIb, singl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polhemus, Mark E., Remich, Shon A., Ogutu, Bernhards R., Waitumbi, John N., Otieno, Lucas, Apollo, Stella, Cummings, James F., Kester, Kent E., Ockenhouse, Christian F., Stewart, Ann, Ofori-Anyinam, Opokua, Ramboer, Isabelle, Cahill, Conor P., Lievens, Marc, Dubois, Marie-Claude, Demoitie, Marie-Ange, Leach, Amanda, Cohen, Joe, Ballou, W. Ripley, Heppner,, D. Gray
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2714466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19649245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006465
_version_ 1782169673646735360
author Polhemus, Mark E.
Remich, Shon A.
Ogutu, Bernhards R.
Waitumbi, John N.
Otieno, Lucas
Apollo, Stella
Cummings, James F.
Kester, Kent E.
Ockenhouse, Christian F.
Stewart, Ann
Ofori-Anyinam, Opokua
Ramboer, Isabelle
Cahill, Conor P.
Lievens, Marc
Dubois, Marie-Claude
Demoitie, Marie-Ange
Leach, Amanda
Cohen, Joe
Ballou, W. Ripley
Heppner,, D. Gray
author_facet Polhemus, Mark E.
Remich, Shon A.
Ogutu, Bernhards R.
Waitumbi, John N.
Otieno, Lucas
Apollo, Stella
Cummings, James F.
Kester, Kent E.
Ockenhouse, Christian F.
Stewart, Ann
Ofori-Anyinam, Opokua
Ramboer, Isabelle
Cahill, Conor P.
Lievens, Marc
Dubois, Marie-Claude
Demoitie, Marie-Ange
Leach, Amanda
Cohen, Joe
Ballou, W. Ripley
Heppner,, D. Gray
author_sort Polhemus, Mark E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study advances the clinical development of the RTS,S/AS01B candidate malaria vaccine to malaria endemic populations. As a primary objective it compares the safety and reactogenicity of RTS,S/AS01B to the more extensively evaluated RTS,S/AS02A vaccine. METHODOLOGY: A Phase IIb, single centre, double-blind, controlled trial of 6 months duration with a subsequent 6 month single-blind follow-up conducted in Kisumu West District, Kenya between August 2005 and August 2006. 255 healthy adults aged 18 to 35 years were randomized (1∶1∶1) to receive 3 doses of RTS,S/AS02A, RTS,S/AS01B or rabies vaccine (Rabipur®; Chiron Behring GmbH) at months 0, 1, 2. The primary objective was the occurrence of severe (grade 3) solicited or unsolicited general (i.e. systemic) adverse events (AEs) during 7 days follow up after each vaccination. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Both candidate vaccines had a good safety profile and were well tolerated. One grade 3 systemic AE occurred within 7 days of vaccination (RTS,S/AS01B group). No unsolicited AEs or SAEs were related to vaccine. A marked increase in anti-CS antibody GMTs was observed post Dose 2 of both RTS,S/AS01B (31.6 EU/mL [95% CI: 23.9 to 41.6]) and RTS,S/AS02A (16.7 EU/mL [95% CI: 12.9 to 21.7]). A further increase was observed post Dose 3 in both the RTS,S/AS01B (41.4 EU/mL [95% CI: 31.7 to 54.2]) and RTS,S/AS02A (21.4 EU/mL [95% CI: 16.0 to 28.7]) groups. Anti-CS antibody GMTs were significantly greater with RTS,S/AS01B compared to RTS,S/AS02A at all time points post Dose 2 and Dose 3. Both candidate vaccines produced strong anti-HBs responses. Vaccine efficacy in the RTS,S/AS01B group was 29.5% (95% CI: −15.4 to 56.9, p = 0.164) and in the RTS,S/AS02A group 31.7% (95% CI: −11.6 to 58.2, p = 0.128). CONCLUSIONS: Both candidate malaria vaccines were well tolerated over a 12 month surveillance period. A more favorable immunogenicity profile was observed with RTS,S/AS01B than with RTS,S/AS02A. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00197054
format Text
id pubmed-2714466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27144662009-08-01 Evaluation of RTS,S/AS02A and RTS,S/AS01B in Adults in a High Malaria Transmission Area Polhemus, Mark E. Remich, Shon A. Ogutu, Bernhards R. Waitumbi, John N. Otieno, Lucas Apollo, Stella Cummings, James F. Kester, Kent E. Ockenhouse, Christian F. Stewart, Ann Ofori-Anyinam, Opokua Ramboer, Isabelle Cahill, Conor P. Lievens, Marc Dubois, Marie-Claude Demoitie, Marie-Ange Leach, Amanda Cohen, Joe Ballou, W. Ripley Heppner,, D. Gray PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: This study advances the clinical development of the RTS,S/AS01B candidate malaria vaccine to malaria endemic populations. As a primary objective it compares the safety and reactogenicity of RTS,S/AS01B to the more extensively evaluated RTS,S/AS02A vaccine. METHODOLOGY: A Phase IIb, single centre, double-blind, controlled trial of 6 months duration with a subsequent 6 month single-blind follow-up conducted in Kisumu West District, Kenya between August 2005 and August 2006. 255 healthy adults aged 18 to 35 years were randomized (1∶1∶1) to receive 3 doses of RTS,S/AS02A, RTS,S/AS01B or rabies vaccine (Rabipur®; Chiron Behring GmbH) at months 0, 1, 2. The primary objective was the occurrence of severe (grade 3) solicited or unsolicited general (i.e. systemic) adverse events (AEs) during 7 days follow up after each vaccination. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Both candidate vaccines had a good safety profile and were well tolerated. One grade 3 systemic AE occurred within 7 days of vaccination (RTS,S/AS01B group). No unsolicited AEs or SAEs were related to vaccine. A marked increase in anti-CS antibody GMTs was observed post Dose 2 of both RTS,S/AS01B (31.6 EU/mL [95% CI: 23.9 to 41.6]) and RTS,S/AS02A (16.7 EU/mL [95% CI: 12.9 to 21.7]). A further increase was observed post Dose 3 in both the RTS,S/AS01B (41.4 EU/mL [95% CI: 31.7 to 54.2]) and RTS,S/AS02A (21.4 EU/mL [95% CI: 16.0 to 28.7]) groups. Anti-CS antibody GMTs were significantly greater with RTS,S/AS01B compared to RTS,S/AS02A at all time points post Dose 2 and Dose 3. Both candidate vaccines produced strong anti-HBs responses. Vaccine efficacy in the RTS,S/AS01B group was 29.5% (95% CI: −15.4 to 56.9, p = 0.164) and in the RTS,S/AS02A group 31.7% (95% CI: −11.6 to 58.2, p = 0.128). CONCLUSIONS: Both candidate malaria vaccines were well tolerated over a 12 month surveillance period. A more favorable immunogenicity profile was observed with RTS,S/AS01B than with RTS,S/AS02A. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00197054 Public Library of Science 2009-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2714466/ /pubmed/19649245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006465 Text en Polhemus et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Polhemus, Mark E.
Remich, Shon A.
Ogutu, Bernhards R.
Waitumbi, John N.
Otieno, Lucas
Apollo, Stella
Cummings, James F.
Kester, Kent E.
Ockenhouse, Christian F.
Stewart, Ann
Ofori-Anyinam, Opokua
Ramboer, Isabelle
Cahill, Conor P.
Lievens, Marc
Dubois, Marie-Claude
Demoitie, Marie-Ange
Leach, Amanda
Cohen, Joe
Ballou, W. Ripley
Heppner,, D. Gray
Evaluation of RTS,S/AS02A and RTS,S/AS01B in Adults in a High Malaria Transmission Area
title Evaluation of RTS,S/AS02A and RTS,S/AS01B in Adults in a High Malaria Transmission Area
title_full Evaluation of RTS,S/AS02A and RTS,S/AS01B in Adults in a High Malaria Transmission Area
title_fullStr Evaluation of RTS,S/AS02A and RTS,S/AS01B in Adults in a High Malaria Transmission Area
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of RTS,S/AS02A and RTS,S/AS01B in Adults in a High Malaria Transmission Area
title_short Evaluation of RTS,S/AS02A and RTS,S/AS01B in Adults in a High Malaria Transmission Area
title_sort evaluation of rts,s/as02a and rts,s/as01b in adults in a high malaria transmission area
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2714466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19649245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006465
work_keys_str_mv AT polhemusmarke evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT remichshona evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT ogutubernhardsr evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT waitumbijohnn evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT otienolucas evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT apollostella evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT cummingsjamesf evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT kesterkente evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT ockenhousechristianf evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT stewartann evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT oforianyinamopokua evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT ramboerisabelle evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT cahillconorp evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT lievensmarc evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT duboismarieclaude evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT demoitiemarieange evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT leachamanda evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT cohenjoe evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT ballouwripley evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea
AT heppnerdgray evaluationofrtssas02aandrtssas01binadultsinahighmalariatransmissionarea