Cargando…

An evaluation of the appropriateness of advice and healthcare contacts made following calls to NHS Direct Wales

BACKGROUND: An evaluation of NHS Direct Wales (NHSDW), a national telephone-based healthcare advice and information service, was undertaken. A key objective was to describe the actions of callers and assess the appropriateness of advice and healthcare contacts made following calls, results of which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snooks, Helen, Peconi, Julie, Munro, James, Cheung, Wai-Yee, Rance, Jaynie, Williams, Anne
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19793398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-178
_version_ 1782172868602232832
author Snooks, Helen
Peconi, Julie
Munro, James
Cheung, Wai-Yee
Rance, Jaynie
Williams, Anne
author_facet Snooks, Helen
Peconi, Julie
Munro, James
Cheung, Wai-Yee
Rance, Jaynie
Williams, Anne
author_sort Snooks, Helen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An evaluation of NHS Direct Wales (NHSDW), a national telephone-based healthcare advice and information service, was undertaken. A key objective was to describe the actions of callers and assess the appropriateness of advice and healthcare contacts made following calls, results of which are reported here. METHODS: Postal questionnaires were sent to consecutive callers to NHSDW in May 2002 and February 2004 to determine 1) callers' actions following calls and 2) their views about the appropriateness of: advice given; and when to seek further care. An independent clinical panel agreed and applied a set of rules about healthcare sites where examinations, investigations, treatments and referrals could be obtained. The rules were then applied to the subsequent contacts to healthcare services reported by respondents and actions were classified in terms of whether they had been necessary and sufficient for the care received. RESULTS: Response rates were similar in each survey: 1033/1897 (54.5%); 606/1204 (50.3%), with 75% reporting contacting NHSDW. In both surveys, nearly half of all callers reported making no further healthcare contact after their call to NHSDW. The most frequent subsequent contacts made were with GPs. More than four fifths of callers rated the advice given - concerning any further care needed and when to seek it - as appropriate (further care needed: survey 1: 673/729, 82.3%; survey 2: 389/421, 92.4%; when to seek further care - survey 1: 462/555, 83.2%; survey 2: n = 295/346, 85.3%). A similar proportion of cases was also rated through the rule set and backed up by the clinical panel as having taken necessary and sufficient actions following their calls to NHSDW (survey 1: 624/729, 80.6%; survey 2: 362/421, 84.4%), with more unnecessary than insufficient actions identified at each survey (survey 1: unnecessary 132/729, 17.1% versus insufficient 11/729, 1.4%; survey 2: unnecessary 47/421, 11.0% versus insufficient 14/421, 3.3%). CONCLUSION: Based on NHSDW caller surveys responses and applying a transparent rule set to caller actions a large majority of subsequent actions were assessed as appropriate, with insufficient contacts particularly infrequent. The challenge for NHSDW is to reduce the number of unnecessary contacts made following calls to the service, whilst maintaining safety.
format Text
id pubmed-2761899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27618992009-10-15 An evaluation of the appropriateness of advice and healthcare contacts made following calls to NHS Direct Wales Snooks, Helen Peconi, Julie Munro, James Cheung, Wai-Yee Rance, Jaynie Williams, Anne BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: An evaluation of NHS Direct Wales (NHSDW), a national telephone-based healthcare advice and information service, was undertaken. A key objective was to describe the actions of callers and assess the appropriateness of advice and healthcare contacts made following calls, results of which are reported here. METHODS: Postal questionnaires were sent to consecutive callers to NHSDW in May 2002 and February 2004 to determine 1) callers' actions following calls and 2) their views about the appropriateness of: advice given; and when to seek further care. An independent clinical panel agreed and applied a set of rules about healthcare sites where examinations, investigations, treatments and referrals could be obtained. The rules were then applied to the subsequent contacts to healthcare services reported by respondents and actions were classified in terms of whether they had been necessary and sufficient for the care received. RESULTS: Response rates were similar in each survey: 1033/1897 (54.5%); 606/1204 (50.3%), with 75% reporting contacting NHSDW. In both surveys, nearly half of all callers reported making no further healthcare contact after their call to NHSDW. The most frequent subsequent contacts made were with GPs. More than four fifths of callers rated the advice given - concerning any further care needed and when to seek it - as appropriate (further care needed: survey 1: 673/729, 82.3%; survey 2: 389/421, 92.4%; when to seek further care - survey 1: 462/555, 83.2%; survey 2: n = 295/346, 85.3%). A similar proportion of cases was also rated through the rule set and backed up by the clinical panel as having taken necessary and sufficient actions following their calls to NHSDW (survey 1: 624/729, 80.6%; survey 2: 362/421, 84.4%), with more unnecessary than insufficient actions identified at each survey (survey 1: unnecessary 132/729, 17.1% versus insufficient 11/729, 1.4%; survey 2: unnecessary 47/421, 11.0% versus insufficient 14/421, 3.3%). CONCLUSION: Based on NHSDW caller surveys responses and applying a transparent rule set to caller actions a large majority of subsequent actions were assessed as appropriate, with insufficient contacts particularly infrequent. The challenge for NHSDW is to reduce the number of unnecessary contacts made following calls to the service, whilst maintaining safety. BioMed Central 2009-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2761899/ /pubmed/19793398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-178 Text en Copyright © 2009 Snooks et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Snooks, Helen
Peconi, Julie
Munro, James
Cheung, Wai-Yee
Rance, Jaynie
Williams, Anne
An evaluation of the appropriateness of advice and healthcare contacts made following calls to NHS Direct Wales
title An evaluation of the appropriateness of advice and healthcare contacts made following calls to NHS Direct Wales
title_full An evaluation of the appropriateness of advice and healthcare contacts made following calls to NHS Direct Wales
title_fullStr An evaluation of the appropriateness of advice and healthcare contacts made following calls to NHS Direct Wales
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the appropriateness of advice and healthcare contacts made following calls to NHS Direct Wales
title_short An evaluation of the appropriateness of advice and healthcare contacts made following calls to NHS Direct Wales
title_sort evaluation of the appropriateness of advice and healthcare contacts made following calls to nhs direct wales
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19793398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-178
work_keys_str_mv AT snookshelen anevaluationoftheappropriatenessofadviceandhealthcarecontactsmadefollowingcallstonhsdirectwales
AT peconijulie anevaluationoftheappropriatenessofadviceandhealthcarecontactsmadefollowingcallstonhsdirectwales
AT munrojames anevaluationoftheappropriatenessofadviceandhealthcarecontactsmadefollowingcallstonhsdirectwales
AT cheungwaiyee anevaluationoftheappropriatenessofadviceandhealthcarecontactsmadefollowingcallstonhsdirectwales
AT rancejaynie anevaluationoftheappropriatenessofadviceandhealthcarecontactsmadefollowingcallstonhsdirectwales
AT williamsanne anevaluationoftheappropriatenessofadviceandhealthcarecontactsmadefollowingcallstonhsdirectwales
AT snookshelen evaluationoftheappropriatenessofadviceandhealthcarecontactsmadefollowingcallstonhsdirectwales
AT peconijulie evaluationoftheappropriatenessofadviceandhealthcarecontactsmadefollowingcallstonhsdirectwales
AT munrojames evaluationoftheappropriatenessofadviceandhealthcarecontactsmadefollowingcallstonhsdirectwales
AT cheungwaiyee evaluationoftheappropriatenessofadviceandhealthcarecontactsmadefollowingcallstonhsdirectwales
AT rancejaynie evaluationoftheappropriatenessofadviceandhealthcarecontactsmadefollowingcallstonhsdirectwales
AT williamsanne evaluationoftheappropriatenessofadviceandhealthcarecontactsmadefollowingcallstonhsdirectwales