Cargando…

The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth

Although the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 is thought to open and shut at its selectivity filter in response to changes of extracellular pH, it is currently unknown whether the channel also shows gating at its inner, cytoplasmic mouth through movements of membrane helices M2 and M4. We used t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ashmole, I, Vavoulis, D V, Stansfeld, P J, Mehta, Puja R, Feng, J F, Sutcliffe, M J, Stanfield, P R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Science Inc 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19703964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2009.175430
_version_ 1782173636888625152
author Ashmole, I
Vavoulis, D V
Stansfeld, P J
Mehta, Puja R
Feng, J F
Sutcliffe, M J
Stanfield, P R
author_facet Ashmole, I
Vavoulis, D V
Stansfeld, P J
Mehta, Puja R
Feng, J F
Sutcliffe, M J
Stanfield, P R
author_sort Ashmole, I
collection PubMed
description Although the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 is thought to open and shut at its selectivity filter in response to changes of extracellular pH, it is currently unknown whether the channel also shows gating at its inner, cytoplasmic mouth through movements of membrane helices M2 and M4. We used two electrode voltage clamp and single channel recording to show that TASK-3 responds to voltage in a way that reveals such gating. In wild-type channels, P(open) was very low at negative voltages, but increased with depolarisation. The effect of voltage was relatively weak and the gating charge small, ∼0.17. Mutants A237T (in M4) and N133A (in M2) increased P(open) at a given voltage, increasing mean open time and the number of openings per burst. In addition, the relationship between P(open) and voltage was shifted to less positive voltages. Mutation of putative hinge glycines (G117A, G231A), residues that are conserved throughout the tandem pore channel family, reduced P(open) at a given voltage, shifting the relationship with voltage to a more positive potential range. None of these mutants substantially affected the response of the channel to extracellular acidification. We have used the results from single channel recording to develop a simple kinetic model to show how gating occurs through two classes of conformation change, with two routes out of the open state, as expected if gating occurs both at the selectivity filter and at its cytoplasmic mouth.
format Text
id pubmed-2770146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Blackwell Science Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27701462009-12-08 The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth Ashmole, I Vavoulis, D V Stansfeld, P J Mehta, Puja R Feng, J F Sutcliffe, M J Stanfield, P R J Physiol Molecular and Cellular Although the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 is thought to open and shut at its selectivity filter in response to changes of extracellular pH, it is currently unknown whether the channel also shows gating at its inner, cytoplasmic mouth through movements of membrane helices M2 and M4. We used two electrode voltage clamp and single channel recording to show that TASK-3 responds to voltage in a way that reveals such gating. In wild-type channels, P(open) was very low at negative voltages, but increased with depolarisation. The effect of voltage was relatively weak and the gating charge small, ∼0.17. Mutants A237T (in M4) and N133A (in M2) increased P(open) at a given voltage, increasing mean open time and the number of openings per burst. In addition, the relationship between P(open) and voltage was shifted to less positive voltages. Mutation of putative hinge glycines (G117A, G231A), residues that are conserved throughout the tandem pore channel family, reduced P(open) at a given voltage, shifting the relationship with voltage to a more positive potential range. None of these mutants substantially affected the response of the channel to extracellular acidification. We have used the results from single channel recording to develop a simple kinetic model to show how gating occurs through two classes of conformation change, with two routes out of the open state, as expected if gating occurs both at the selectivity filter and at its cytoplasmic mouth. Blackwell Science Inc 2009-10-15 2009-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2770146/ /pubmed/19703964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2009.175430 Text en Journal compilation © 2009 The Physiological Society
spellingShingle Molecular and Cellular
Ashmole, I
Vavoulis, D V
Stansfeld, P J
Mehta, Puja R
Feng, J F
Sutcliffe, M J
Stanfield, P R
The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth
title The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth
title_full The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth
title_fullStr The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth
title_full_unstemmed The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth
title_short The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth
title_sort response of the tandem pore potassium channel task-3 (k(2p)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth
topic Molecular and Cellular
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19703964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2009.175430
work_keys_str_mv AT ashmolei theresponseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth
AT vavoulisdv theresponseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth
AT stansfeldpj theresponseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth
AT mehtapujar theresponseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth
AT fengjf theresponseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth
AT sutcliffemj theresponseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth
AT stanfieldpr theresponseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth
AT ashmolei responseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth
AT vavoulisdv responseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth
AT stansfeldpj responseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth
AT mehtapujar responseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth
AT fengjf responseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth
AT sutcliffemj responseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth
AT stanfieldpr responseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth