Cargando…
The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth
Although the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 is thought to open and shut at its selectivity filter in response to changes of extracellular pH, it is currently unknown whether the channel also shows gating at its inner, cytoplasmic mouth through movements of membrane helices M2 and M4. We used t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Science Inc
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19703964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2009.175430 |
_version_ | 1782173636888625152 |
---|---|
author | Ashmole, I Vavoulis, D V Stansfeld, P J Mehta, Puja R Feng, J F Sutcliffe, M J Stanfield, P R |
author_facet | Ashmole, I Vavoulis, D V Stansfeld, P J Mehta, Puja R Feng, J F Sutcliffe, M J Stanfield, P R |
author_sort | Ashmole, I |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 is thought to open and shut at its selectivity filter in response to changes of extracellular pH, it is currently unknown whether the channel also shows gating at its inner, cytoplasmic mouth through movements of membrane helices M2 and M4. We used two electrode voltage clamp and single channel recording to show that TASK-3 responds to voltage in a way that reveals such gating. In wild-type channels, P(open) was very low at negative voltages, but increased with depolarisation. The effect of voltage was relatively weak and the gating charge small, ∼0.17. Mutants A237T (in M4) and N133A (in M2) increased P(open) at a given voltage, increasing mean open time and the number of openings per burst. In addition, the relationship between P(open) and voltage was shifted to less positive voltages. Mutation of putative hinge glycines (G117A, G231A), residues that are conserved throughout the tandem pore channel family, reduced P(open) at a given voltage, shifting the relationship with voltage to a more positive potential range. None of these mutants substantially affected the response of the channel to extracellular acidification. We have used the results from single channel recording to develop a simple kinetic model to show how gating occurs through two classes of conformation change, with two routes out of the open state, as expected if gating occurs both at the selectivity filter and at its cytoplasmic mouth. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2770146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Blackwell Science Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27701462009-12-08 The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth Ashmole, I Vavoulis, D V Stansfeld, P J Mehta, Puja R Feng, J F Sutcliffe, M J Stanfield, P R J Physiol Molecular and Cellular Although the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 is thought to open and shut at its selectivity filter in response to changes of extracellular pH, it is currently unknown whether the channel also shows gating at its inner, cytoplasmic mouth through movements of membrane helices M2 and M4. We used two electrode voltage clamp and single channel recording to show that TASK-3 responds to voltage in a way that reveals such gating. In wild-type channels, P(open) was very low at negative voltages, but increased with depolarisation. The effect of voltage was relatively weak and the gating charge small, ∼0.17. Mutants A237T (in M4) and N133A (in M2) increased P(open) at a given voltage, increasing mean open time and the number of openings per burst. In addition, the relationship between P(open) and voltage was shifted to less positive voltages. Mutation of putative hinge glycines (G117A, G231A), residues that are conserved throughout the tandem pore channel family, reduced P(open) at a given voltage, shifting the relationship with voltage to a more positive potential range. None of these mutants substantially affected the response of the channel to extracellular acidification. We have used the results from single channel recording to develop a simple kinetic model to show how gating occurs through two classes of conformation change, with two routes out of the open state, as expected if gating occurs both at the selectivity filter and at its cytoplasmic mouth. Blackwell Science Inc 2009-10-15 2009-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2770146/ /pubmed/19703964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2009.175430 Text en Journal compilation © 2009 The Physiological Society |
spellingShingle | Molecular and Cellular Ashmole, I Vavoulis, D V Stansfeld, P J Mehta, Puja R Feng, J F Sutcliffe, M J Stanfield, P R The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth |
title | The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth |
title_full | The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth |
title_fullStr | The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth |
title_full_unstemmed | The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth |
title_short | The response of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-3 (K(2P)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth |
title_sort | response of the tandem pore potassium channel task-3 (k(2p)9.1) to voltage: gating at the cytoplasmic mouth |
topic | Molecular and Cellular |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19703964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2009.175430 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ashmolei theresponseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth AT vavoulisdv theresponseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth AT stansfeldpj theresponseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth AT mehtapujar theresponseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth AT fengjf theresponseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth AT sutcliffemj theresponseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth AT stanfieldpr theresponseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth AT ashmolei responseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth AT vavoulisdv responseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth AT stansfeldpj responseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth AT mehtapujar responseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth AT fengjf responseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth AT sutcliffemj responseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth AT stanfieldpr responseofthetandemporepotassiumchanneltask3k2p91tovoltagegatingatthecytoplasmicmouth |